It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SinnthiaPlease help the OP out and explain what is not valid about a COLB from Hawaii. Please use facts and the truth though, and try not to just say "cuz its not." thanks.
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
The bottom line is that, to my knowledge, a certification of live birth is all that's needed.
Bedtime.
Originally posted by conspiracytheoristIAM
reply to post by Sinnthia
Sinnthia....There is a difference between certification and certificate. Just because you can't understand it or I can't explain it, doesn't make the difference go away. If anyone is a lawyer on ATS reading this thread, please explain the nuances.
Look up certification in Black's Law Dictionary...the act of attesting. Do the same for certificate.....a document in which a fact is formally attested.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
The bottom line is that, to my knowledge, a certification of live birth is all that's needed.
Bedtime.
And you have one. Nothing obtuse about my question. You are just making up excuses for the fact that people are saying one is valid and one is not when none of you can even explain the difference. Your pictures are no help either since I can find at least 5 different Hawaiian birth certificates. You have the current one they issue for Obama and ironically, it is exactly what you asked for above.
Either explain to me the difference between these things or stop saying there is a difference. Seems pretty simple.
Obviously you cannot tell me the difference between a certificate and a certification. I will help you out though. They are the same thing. So asking for one because you do not like the other is going to get you nowhere. Different states and times use different titles but none of you can explain how a certification of live birth is any less valid than a certificate of live birth.
If your accusation is that what was provided has been forged, then you all need to get together and make up your minds. Either it is not good enough, or it was forged. Why would anyone forge documents not good enough? You theory eats itself.edit on 28-12-2010 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thecinic
VERY simple now get this..
Because Obama was not born in the US he was born in kenya.
If he produced that information it would be found presented as false.
Originally posted by 46ACE
One has handwritten documentation like a signature of the nurse or doctor attending( which are illegal to forge and easily back checked). And a raised state seal imprinted.
The other the ("Certificate of live birth") I can make with photoshop elements or word perfect.
Originally posted by conspiracytheoristIAM
reply to post by Sinnthia
Sinnthia....There is a difference between certification and certificate. Just because you can't understand it or I can't explain it, doesn't make the difference go away. If anyone is a lawyer on ATS reading this thread, please explain the nuances.
Look up certification in Black's Law Dictionary...the act of attesting. Do the same for certificate.....a document in which a fact is formally attested.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
The difference has been gone over many times on ATS,