A secret history of the Church
[This is an extract from a text published BY ME elsewhere and NOT plagiarism, since no one can plagiarize from himself! A note for the Moderators. If
they are in doubt, contact me, since you will have my e-mail at ATS!]
Let us start with the Old Testament.
I will make it short, but this is all according to what is actually written in the Old Testament (see Bible references at the end of this text ).
The Hebrews wanted out of Egypt and Yahweh – who I do believe is an entity (maybe an extraterrestrial) who wanted to have his own people to work for
him as a split-off group (his own faction) and for a power he could gradually extend – saw an opportunity to have his own people here.
He, through Moses, offered to the Hebrews to lead them out to a Promised Land. But they could have had it easier, since the Pharaoh was willing to let
them go, yet Yahweh wanted to demonstrate his power and first have all his 10 plagues come over Egypt. He was eager to show his muscles and hardened
the heart of Pharaoh to provoke a fight about the issue. One of the plagues was to go through the land of Egypt and kill all firstborn of men and
animals, except among the Hebrews.
As the history in the Bible shows, this wasn’t necessary, but he wanted to have his cruel game as a demonstration of his power.
When they finally came to the Promised Land, people were living there in various towns. Yahweh ordered the Hebrews to slaughter them all and not spare
even an old man, a woman or a child – so that they would have (Deut. 6:11) “…houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells
digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not”.
When the inhabitants of a town wanted to negotiate, he again hardened their hearts to force the conflict he wanted to have as an excuse to make the
Hebrews kill them all. Occasionally only virgins were spared and caught as booty, and it would be naïve to believe that it wouldn’t be for sexual
These murderous robbing raids were a veritable holocaust!
Now Yahweh had his people. He was cruel, selfish and revenging and severely punishing when it didn’t follow. The text in the Old Testament doesn’t
indicate that he knew what real love is, but he rather loved fight and bloodshed.
Now we jump to the time 2000 years ago. Jesus was born, an incarnation of Christ. Christ is actually not a name but a designation, but we don’t know
a real name for him. Jesus was the name he was given after incarnating. He began teaching and preaching in the Promised Land and with time attracted
lots of people. What he said and did was upsetting Yahweh, since he told things that Yahweh’s people shouldn’t know.
His message was revolutionary and he revealed secrets. Slowly, bit by bit. He talked about a love that Yahweh despised. He talked about his
“Father” in terms which gave a picture very different from the one of Yahweh.
The “Father” is loving, caring, benevolent, forgiving, contrary to the qualities of Yahweh. So the one Jesus talked about clearly wasn’t Yahweh.
John 8:31-44 reflects this in Jesus’ speech to the Jews:
8:38 - “I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.”
8:42 - “Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he
8:44 - “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
So Jesus actually was an agent provocateur, against Yahweh!
Yahweh felt threatened by this man and wanted him killed. He influenced the mind of the high priest Caiaphas to have Jesus crucified like a criminal,
hoping that the new teachings would after his death become forgotten. But the contrary occurred. The murder of Jesus gave more power to the movement
he had started and it continued growing. Yahweh was very concerned about this.
The first Christians were what theology calls “Christian Jews”, a bit depreciatingly, as if they would not have been real Christians. But they
were, of course, the most Christian Christians that have ever been, since they were the closest to Jesus himself. Out of them grew the Gnostic
The latter declared that Yahweh (who they also called Yaldabaoth) wasn’t a real god, but a demiurge, a secondary god, himself created by the highest
God and prime creator – a fact that Yahweh didn’t want to be known. He wanted to be regarded as the prime creator himself.
In this situation Yahweh developed a sinister but clever plan. He wanted to infiltrate this new movement and twist it his own ways so that it would
instead serve his own purposes. One of his agents was Paul, who first as Saul had persecuted Christians. Which Christians? Obviously the Christian
Jews and the Gnostic Christians, since there yet were almost no other. Yahweh gave him a vision and made him believe to experience Christ, and Saul
became Paul, who converted and began to preach Christianity.
But what Christianity? Not the one he had before fought against, but his own modified and falsified version the way Yahweh wanted to have it.
In the year 325 AD the emperor Constantine with the council of Nicaea created the foundation for the Church as it is to day. His intention was to
selfishly use this Church as a tool for his power and he obviously was an unknowing agent of Yahweh. At the council, the Gnostic Christians were
muzzled and were not allowed to speak.
The emperor gave their petitions unopened to the fire. They were at the end declared to be heretics. This was the beginning of the end of Gnostic
Christianity. Instead a yahwistic Church was formed, which claimed to adhere to Jesus Christ, but not the true one. We since have two Christs: the
false one of the Church and the true one who had once incarnated as Jesus.
So who is Christ? I believe that he is a kind of personification of the love of the prime creator and that he was sent by those who intend to save the
Earth from the grip of negative entities.
And who, then, is Yahweh? In the latter decades remarkably interesting discoveries were made in the research into the history of religions, based on
archeological findings in Israel. In the original Hebrew religion (or Pre-Hebrew religion), the highest god was ’El Elyon . He had 70 sons and
one of them was Yahweh.
Yahweh had a consort ’Asherah, a goddess. Her name is found around 40 times in the Hebrew text of the Bible, but it is always translated as
“tree” or “grove” in order to obscure the real meaning, since her symbol is a vertical pole or a tree. At about the time of the exodus from
Egypt, and still more during the time of the Babylonian captivity, the religion was made monotheistic and one shouldn’t know of the others, not even
When the Bible states that it is forbidden to plant a tree at the altar of Yahweh (Deut. 16:21), the real meaning is that it is forbidden to put a
symbol (or maybe even image) of ’Asherah at the altar (and what sense would it have to forbid planting a tree there?).
Yahweh was considered a warrior and weather god from Sinai, where certain entities had their center…
The polytheistic origin is reflected in the Bible’s creation story, which will no doubt have its origin in the one given in the texts on the clay
plates of Sumeria and Babylon.
The first sentence in the Bible (Gen. 1:1) reads: “Bereshiyt bara ’Elohim et ha shamayim v-et ha arez”, translated as “In the beginning God
created the heaven and the Earth.” [Remark: I spell “bereshiyt” this way, but it should normally be spelled without the “y”. But if I leave
the “y” out, a ridiculous filter makes “#” of the four remaining last letters! Even though this has nothing whatsoever to do with the English
word composed by these four letters…]
Now it has always been a problem swept under the carpet that ’Elohim is plural and literally means “gods”.
Therefore, some want to understand it as: “In the beginning the gods created the heaven and the Earth”, which doesn’t fit grammatically, since
the verb bara is in singular.
However, the first word bereshiyt can not only be translated as “beginning”, but also as “the first one” – the one who was in the beginning.
Now we can correctly (no grammatical problem anymore) translate as “The First One created the gods, the heavens and the Earth”! (Shamajim is also
plural and actually means “heavens” – or other cosmic worlds?)
Yahweh is in the Hebrew Bible text usually mentioned as “Yahweh Elohim”, which seems to indicate that he is one of the created ’Elohim. The
plural repeats in other passages: “WE will create humans in OUR image” and so on, still swept under the carpet and declared to be pluralis
majestatis, a white lie in a dilemma…
Conclusion: The Catholic Church is a power tool for a certain not very positive force (entity) to exercise power of the Earth humans!
 A choice of the many cruelties in the Old Testament: Gen.: 34,25-29; Ex.: 12,12; 12,29-30; 15,3; 32,26-28; Lev.: 26,7-8; 26,21-22; 26,26-29; Num.:
15,32-36; 16,29-35; 16,46-49; 21,3-6; 21,24-25; 21,33-35; 31,7-10; 31,14-18; 31,31-32; 31,35; Deut: 2,32-34;. 3,1-6; 7,2-3; 9,35 13,9-10; 13,14-16;
20,10-17; 21,11-14; Joshua: 6,20-25; 8,2; 8,21-25; 8,29; 10,10-11; 10,17-40; 11,6-22 ; Judges: 1,4-11; 1,17; 1,25; 3,29-31; 4,14-16; 7,15-25; 8,17;
9,4-5; 9,43-45; 9,49-52; 11,30-40; 15,15-16; 18,27; 19,22-29; 20,2; 20,31-37; 20,41-48; 1 Samuel: 5,8-9; 6,19; 11,6-11; 15,3-9; 15,33; 18,7; 30,17; 2
Samuel: 5,8; 5,25; 8,1-5; 10,18; 12,31; 18,6-7; 24,10-16; 1 Kings: 20,28-30; 2 Kings: 1,9-14; 2,23-25; 5,25-27; 6,18; 10,13-25; 14,5-7; 15,16; 19,35;
1 Chron.: 20,2-3; Psalms: 137,9; Isaiah: 13,15-18; 45,5-7; 49,25-26; Jeremiah 16,3-5; Lament.: 4,9-11; Ezekiel: 6,12-13; 9,3-6; Hosea: 13,15; 14,1.
 Ein Gott allein? JHWH-Verehrung und biblischer Monotheismus im Kontext der israelitischen und altorientalischen Religionsgeschichte, 13th
Colloquium of the Swiss Academy of Religious and Social Sciences, ed. by Walter Dietrich and Martin A. Klopfenstein, Universitätsverlag, Freiburg
(Switzerland), 1994 (several contributions in this valuable book are in English).
edit on 3-1-2011 by memyself because: (no reason given)