posted on Jul, 26 2008 @ 09:38 PM
Evolutionists and anthropologists claim that the Stone Age lasted for at least 100,000 years, during which time the world population of Neanderthal
and Cro-magnon men was roughly constant, between one and 10 million. All that time they were burying their dead with artifacts. By this scenario,
they would have buried at least four billion bodies. If the evolutionary time-scale is correct, buried human bones should be able to last for much
longer than 100,000 years. Like the dinosaurs presumably have, there should have been uncountable fossils.
By their time-scale, it is supposed that there should have been four billion Stone Age skeletons, and certainly countless buried artifacts. There
should be multiple millions of them in fact, given the enormous time-frame they claim, yet only a few thousand bones and fragments have ever been
found and these are far too few to fit the Stone Age theory and the thousands of years it was supposed to have taken place. Why worry about a
“missing link” when the entire chain is missing!? In fact, not even one single set of transitional fossils (like reptiles becoming birds) has
ever been found in all of human history. They can not find what has never existed.
An accidental world, with chance as a mechanism for life forms, must fall upward against science’s axiom that out of nothing comes nothing. Cause
and effect demands some Causer prior to nothingness. Chance, to Emanuel Kant, is an excuse for ignorance. Chance is not even a noun, it can do
nothing of itself, it has no power to effect, it is not an x-factor, as many are convinced. And chance is not composed of physical matter.
Regardless of those facts, to those who believe in evolution or carry a disbelief in Creationism or Intelligent Design, chance was the x-factor in
everything coming into existence. Otherwise, they must admit that they don’t know how matter, and thus life, came into existence. They simply
don’t know and can only placate theories (subjective). We should expect science to deal only with facts (objective), approaching things rationally
and logically. They have not. Evolution remains in the textbooks. Believing in something does not make it true. Humanity once believed the earth
was flat, however their belief in that did nothing to change the fact that it was spherical.
Another consideration is that it is impossible for matter to create itself, spontaneously, out of nothing. Evolutional theory is of no help: it
doesn’t explain how matter was formed and thus by extension, it can not explain the origin of life. In fact over time, cells do not gain additional
(which, in evolution, must be present for transitional stages), they lose DNA integrity. Each cell is like a carbon copy of the original. With each
passing day, the cells are making copies of each other
and becoming a little less like the original. The cells are not evolving, they are aging. I’ve got more wrinkles today than ten years ago.
Natural Selection produces extinction of the species, not a proliferation of it. Cells do not improve or become superior over time, but in fact do
just the opposite. The Law of Entropy says that cells break down or smooth out over time and lose their cellular integrity. It is the polar opposite
of a theoretical, evolutional process.
The general approach for those who don’t believe in a Creator, the argument or theory is an equation: Space + Time + Chance = Everything. How can,
in what in reality is, 0 + 0 + 0 = everything!? The space did not cause matter to come into existence, nor did time. Neither can chance influence
or create events. Can being come from non-being… spontaneous generation of matter from nothing? Can chance actually do anything or cause something
to happen? No. Chance is only the likelihood of something occurring. There must first come “cause” before an effect can occur. An a cause
logically demand a Causer…and a Creator. Chance is powerless. It can not mak