It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

found some evidence the globalists want to cut down the population...

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by MavRck
 


The problem is that the resources have been mismanaged!

There should be plenty for all, but we have allowed these selfish psychopaths to grab resources and plunder the earth without regard for people, wildlife, or future of the planet.

The problem has always been mismanagement not scarcity!




posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 12:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Alethea
 


how can you say we are running out of resources? is this what you have heard on the news? when was the last time you went and lived off of what you had in your backpack? you would surprised how many true resources are available.
edit on 31-12-2010 by WJjeeper because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 01:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by rndinslc
So the question is, how do we 'remove' 5.5 billion people? Unless you can convince people that procreating is a bad thing then there is no easy answer.

that has already been decided also
with the NWO's Gay Agenda.

Turn the population into gays by
drugs, food, drink and inhalants
sprayed from airplanes. They will
eventually die off with no children.
Problem solved

The drugs, food, drink and inhalants
will cease when the population
recedes back under 500M.

My earlier post shows the article where
the Billionaires said that overpopulation
was the #1 challenge to earth. But it
never stated what THEY intended to do
about it. Well here's ya some research
I have concluded.

Project Cloverleaf - spraying of inhalants
by commercial airlines is said to be financed
by Bill Gates (he was at that meeting).

George Soros owns vast stock in Pfizer
and Monsanto, both containing ways to
distribute the gay agenda properties
to mass amounts of people. Soros
was at that meeting as well.

Ted Turner owns CNN and Oprah owns
Harpo both mass media outlets to push
the gay agenda as well. To make it socially
normal to be gay. Ted and Oprah was at
that meeting as well.

Knowing all this stuff gives new meaning
to the disposition of that meeting.

Gay people do not procreate.
That would be the whole idea
of population control.

However, the masses turning gay
out there in the world have no idea
WHY they are turning gay. They're
just following the urges that the drugs,
food, drink and inhalants are causing.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 05:08 AM
link   
reply to post by WJjeeper
 


And the Hand of Man taints that forest and strips it down to nothing, then it becomes yet another concrete jungle in a world full of concrete jungles. A city that produces more crime, poverty, and disease, pollution and pointless bullsh^t. I agree with your sentiments though. Killing off everyone is not a solution. Heck, there's probably about a good twenty or thirty viable outcomes with little to no loss of human life. I was just pointing out that your forest will eventually be destroyed to create space for shopping malls if we continue on the path we're on as a species. That and so many more terrible things will happen. Something has to change.
I agree with the other posters that there should be some form of population control in place. I mean, look at China, they literally have no room for anymore people (I have been there. Walking down the sidewalk is an act of Providence) except those places in the middle of nowhere and to put people there they would have to tear up the environment even more. A One-Child policy isn't such a bad thing. A death-rate higher than a birth-rate isn't such a bad thing either as long as its done NATURALLY (i.e. through old age and making less babies.) Personally, I really don't want anyone to be killed before their alotted time is up especially at the hands of some crazy group of people who think they're better than the rest of us because they come from Old Money. The benefit of the few at the cost of the many? That's ridiculous. I don't have any kids and don't plan on creating any biological offspring. Later in life, if I want a child, I will just adopt a kid that already exists instead of making another. Give him or her a good home and take my own advice by not procreating.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 06:09 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Turn the population into gays by drugs, food, drink and inhalants sprayed from airplanes. They will eventually die off with no children. Problem solved


Please tell me what drugs, foods, drinks and inhalants sprayed from airplanes would make someone turn gay? Then, please explain how this is going to help decrease the world population? Have you not heard of "turkey basting" or surrogates? GBL's surely have, and it goes on daily around the world. How many GBL folks are there in America?

Source
Just a rough guesstimate from this sites Composite U.S. Demographics show around 1.51% of Americans identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual. Let's round it up to 2%, OK? IF this 2% did not reproduce, folks like OctoMom and my daughter would cover that shortage with ease. So we are back to square one before anyone gets "turned gay". IMO, turning people gay is not going to help matters in any given time frame. If TPTB decide X number of folks gotta go, it's going to be radical and fast. Don't take drugs, eat food, drink anything, or breathe and you will be fine. That's the kind of approach that will get some fast results.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 06:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by retiredTxn
Please tell me what drugs, foods, drinks and inhalants sprayed from airplanes would make someone turn gay? Then, please explain how this is going to help decrease the world population? Have you not heard of "turkey basting" or surrogates? GBL's surely have, and it goes on daily around the world. How many GBL folks are there in America?

Source
Just a rough guesstimate from this sites Composite U.S. Demographics show around 1.51% of Americans identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual. Let's round it up to 2%, OK? IF this 2% did not reproduce, folks like OctoMom and my daughter would cover that shortage with ease. So we are back to square one before anyone gets "turned gay". IMO, turning people gay is not going to help matters in any given time frame. If TPTB decide X number of folks gotta go, it's going to be radical and fast. Don't take drugs, eat food, drink anything, or breathe and you will be fine. That's the kind of approach that will get some fast results.

dude, please do ur homework. I hate to play catch-up
in every single thread.

And I would be willing to bet big money
that there is lot more than a 2% population
that is gay. There is even more than that
enlisted in the military.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 07:11 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



dude, please do ur homework. I hate to play catch-up in every single thread. And I would be willing to bet big money that there is lot more than a 2% population that is gay. There is even more than that enlisted in the military.


There are more than 7 million GBL's in America? WOW! Then why does our population not dwindle, excluding the illegal immigrant numbers? And you say there is a higher percentage in the military? Just at 2%, that's like 30,000 GBL's in our military! Don't ask don't tell was a huge success. I'm still doing my homework and I hate it that you have to play catch-up in every single thread. Just give us your source when you make a statement that is so bizarre. Thank you in advance.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Let me explain something to you.

The rich guys already have all the property and resources they need.

The larger the population gets, the smaller the pie gets for you, the working class human.

Thus, I can only assume that "the globalists" want the population to grow and grow and grow, or to at least stay as ridiculously high as it is right now.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by c1172558
Let me explain something to you.

The rich guys already have all the property and resources they need.

The larger the population gets, the smaller the pie gets for you, the working class human.

Thus, I can only assume that "the globalists" want the population to grow and grow and grow, or to at least stay as ridiculously high as it is right now.


Exactly, until eventually you starve, or there is war, or some sort of mass depopulation event.

I am not the anti-christ and i am certainly not going to "off myself" (thanks for the suggestion!) for pointing out the FACT that "OVERPOPULTATION IS THE #1 THREAT TO HUMANITY" .

Hahaha... so many... silly silly people here.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 06:35 PM
link   
1939-1946: I am 71 and for my first 7 years lived on an isolated farm, no hydro, no telephone, no running water, and all we did was work! HMMM Keep that in mind!….except how can we return to the land if the Gov’t owns it all?

1947-1956: Then my father‘s farm was bought out by the Government, as a new Hwy between Toronto and Barrie, ON was being built that cut off our Western access to civilization. He was paid $5,000. He borrowed $6,000 more and bought a new farm. This one had hydro, telephone, running water and an indoor bathroom. Oh My! The luxury (for now!)

1963: Dad’s 4 child labour daughters were now grown and away from home with just the youngest, a son, left. The farms around were being bought up by some Conglomerate, which just used the land but not the buildings. Dad was paid $25,000.00 for his farm then he and mom retired to a small city

A year later, the (ex) farming neighbour was paid $100,000.00 for his farm and again the buildings were not used. This Conglomerate was just growing crops….mainly corn!

I didn’t think much of it then, and to pass by that area now and see the barn in ruins, the house burned down and only a rickety garage standing, shows how much building are worth. It’s the land.!!!!!!

It seems now that to get off the grid one must, in essence, “return to the land’ the “poor years of my life” from birth until 1956. After that I was, and still am self sufficient, but many things change!

Who is supposed to die? I am just guessing…

First I think of myself, now 71 and have been disabled for 41 years and of no use to the NWO,
The homeless people,
The black or other coloured people… that’s a variable
The jobless
The illiterate
Anyone who gives birth….child or mother. Father gets castrated.
Anyone not knowing how to operate a computer.

Just flapping my gums here, but I can see the Rothchilds and the German/British Monarchy interbreeding and then there really eventually WILL BE reptilian creatures populating this earth.



edit on 5-1-2011 by canadiansenior70 because: date



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join