Evil Disney owns 50% of History Channel

page: 2
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 06:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gabrielle.Black
oh wow,

You guy's are really starting to become freaks. Disney teaches us respect, they teach us what's ring and wrong, and they have good shows.

The average joe would come on here and laugh. DISNEY EVIL???? That's an insult, not just an insult, but anyone that thinks that is a nutjob.

Come to think of it, most people on here are uneducated, bigoted, racist anyway.

Get a life guys, there's more important things to life then accusing DISNEY of being evil. What a waste of time.


By the way the more i look at how our world really works, and what's really going in other countries, the I think of America as a saint.

We are basically making the governments of our world out to be the bad guys, and the people who in other countries that are third world countries as non corrupt.

You guy's should all wake up and have a look at what's really going on rather than looking at the world through a computer screen and assume that # is what's really happening.

I bet you all spend 90% of your time in a room, and don't even have a clue.




posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 06:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wally Hope
A pagan festival that was a week of lawlessness where no crime could be prosecuted, and ended with a human sacrifice. Public nudity and sex crimes such as rape were particularly favored, apparently.

You must have heard the Disney version...


Obviously. ;D Ah, sarcasm. Atleast I hope it was.



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 06:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gabrielle.Black

Originally posted by Gabrielle.Black
oh wow,

You guy's are really starting to become freaks. Disney teaches us respect, they teach us what's ring and wrong, and they have good shows.

The average joe would come on here and laugh. DISNEY EVIL???? That's an insult, not just an insult, but anyone that thinks that is a nutjob.

Come to think of it, most people on here are uneducated, bigoted, racist anyway.

Get a life guys, there's more important things to life then accusing DISNEY of being evil. What a waste of time.


By the way the more i look at how our world really works, and what's really going in other countries, the I think of America as a saint.

We are basically making the governments of our world out to be the bad guys, and the people who in other countries that are third world countries as non corrupt.

You guy's should all wake up and have a look at what's really going on rather than looking at the world through a computer screen and assume that # is what's really happening.

I bet you all spend 90% of your time in a room, and don't even have a clue.


I am going to go bike ride in the pouring rain? You want me to get more hours on my job? What is your point? That you are apalled at the crazy talk? Maybe you should hit the play button on one of the videos on the first page, then you'll really be upset.
edit on 27-12-2010 by ThinkingCap because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Ok the messages are in there but, after watching all the disney movies my self some multiple times i have never had the urge to be gay.

Perhaps the people who made these cartoons where having a little fun with the audience.
I can already see them talking about it on the coffee table, Hmm what shall we sneak in to this movie?
Yeah lets do a big (aghum) penis on the castle. lol.

Great video though really good to watch.



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 07:13 AM
link   
This is always a fun topic for me
ive studied all this stuff online msyelf. I cant say all of disney is evil, but its interesting to know, walt disney himself was a 333 degree mason!!! and him and reagen were good freinds!
MY research, has taught me, those sexual images you see in the cartoons..is the artists signature* its his/her own way of self markmenship and creativity, without anyone else knowing it. why its sexual* is beyond me..yuode think hidding a signature somewhere would be good enough. its a guy thing, so ive learned thats all. but is it right>? i dont think so, being a kids movie/cartoon.
around 1994, the smurfs were still on. channel 5 i think? FOX. after the credits rolled,( i wa 19 at the time) Gargamel would show, clenching his fists, laughing out loud evil, like he was god, had his way or something, paramount? studio lightning bolt would show and that was that.
i thought that wa sevil as all hell! beucae it made me think, it was disney, or the artist, or FOX? whatever, impression of gargamel finnaly killing and eating the smurfs. thas the impression it gave me



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   
I was roughly 10 when the Little Mermaid and Lion King were popular. I remember seeing in the news that there were hidden messages in the movies. I watched them over and over again, and I couldn't find anything. Why? Because I ha no idea what sex was, or what a penis looked like!
I think the animators put those in the movies to make them more bearable for the adults, honestly. If you have kids, you'll understand what I'm talking about. Disney shows now are ridiculously mind-numbing. Every show has a lead character that is incompetent, making kids think it's ok to be stupid or incapable of performing daily tasks without screwing it up. "it'll be fine, everyone will laugh at me!". I would rather my step kids watch history or discovery channel over Disney any day.



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 07:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Segador
I laugh at people who watch the History channel

www.cracked.com...

There is no damn history on this channel ya idiots!


HAHA this is hilarious

They do show an awful lot of shows on Hitler and Nazi's. I watch the HC all the time honestly. I like it. It gives me something to look up on my own.

Now Disney is evil! I blame them for my warped sense of fairy tale endings lol It doesn't happen! So you can blame Disney for all divorces lol



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Right? lol, it is a bit odd how every character is orphanized. Perhaps the Sex and Penis subliminal messages were their Trophy Signatures that they would hide, and the real subliminal implants was the actual content itself.

I still think Bambi should win Horror Movie of the Century, with Psycho and the Shining right behind.

Makes you wonder what their agenda is, either way.
edit on 27-12-2010 by ThinkingCap because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2010 @ 11:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Wally Hope
 


Wow.... just... WOW. What Pagan rituals have you seen? All of the ones that I've been to (being Pagan and all...) have been a great deal more sedate and peaceful than that! Worshiping nature, the natural balance, things such as that. Considerably less on the whole "blood sacrifice" thing, what with us generally revering all life. Even Hippies (though admittedly, that one is kinda tough).

On another note, I can't help but giggle at the fact that when a lot of people 'round these parts see a pyramid on ANYTHING they point and scream "Illuminati!". I remember the Ducktales movie rather fondly from the innocent, wayward days of my youth. A large chunk of the film took place in EGYPT. Yeah, Egypt. That place where they have pyramids.

Now lets move on the the various "satanic" symbols supposedly strewn about these films. The one that made me laugh the most would have to be the "satanic snake". So, just to clear things up... is EVERY cobra satanic, or just the purple ones that turn into elephants? As far as the Chronicles of Narnia go, I must say its a bit of a stretch of the imagination to see "satanic influence" in a series that is, in essence one GIANT CHRISTIAN ALLEGORY! C.S Lewis (that charming chap who wrote the series) was a born again Christian, not the ideal person to be a proselytizer for the Dark Lord.

Right. I believe I'm about done here for now. I've put in my few cents. Resume conversation.



posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 02:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by DeadJester
Wow.... just... WOW. What Pagan rituals have you seen?


LOL sorry I wasn't around 2000 years ago.

Do really think modern day neo-Pagans are the same as the original ones? Different times, different culture.



posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Wally Hope
 


I do when its a group of Norse or Celtic reconstructionists doing their thing! Those folks pride themselves on their historical accuracy, and alas... once again... no human sacrifices I'm afraid. Though for the record, a mere two hundred or so years ago, there was one cult that was still killing folks. Hangings and burnings at various stakes if memory serves...

Oh, as a minor post script... I can't help but shudder a little when referred to as a "neo-pagan". Brings to mind various nightmarish images of crystal waving hippies. *laughs* Not that I personally have anything against crystal waving mind you.... just hippies.



posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeadJester
reply to post by Wally Hope
 


I do when its a group of Norse or Celtic reconstructionists doing their thing! Those folks pride themselves on their historical accuracy, and alas... once again... no human sacrifices I'm afraid. Though for the record, a mere two hundred or so years ago, there was one cult that was still killing folks. Hangings and burnings at various stakes if memory serves...

Oh, as a minor post script... I can't help but shudder a little when referred to as a "neo-pagan". Brings to mind various nightmarish images of crystal waving hippies. *laughs* Not that I personally have anything against crystal waving mind you.... just hippies.


LOL neo simply means new, as in new Pagans, not real pre-Christian Pagans. Neo-nazis don't put people in gas chambers during their 'reconstructions' either.

You do know that Paganism, in Christian terms, was simply a blanket term for any polytheistic religions, and outside of Christianity any none Abrahamic religion? Simply pre-christian gentiles.

The term Pagan came from the Latin for 'country dweller'. It didn't become recognized as a 'religion', or ethnic identity, itself until the 17th century.



posted on Dec, 29 2010 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by ThinkingCap
 


Owned by Hurst, Capital Cities, owned by BBC, owned by Disney

I haven't watched the videos yet, but are you sure Disney owns the BBC?

Doesn't the UK gov't own the BBC?

I'm not questioning concentration of the media, but this statement appears fishy to me.

I'll check out the vids in the morning.



posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 05:33 AM
link   
ive seen most of the movies as a kid, i didnt notice any of that. Ive never known some one to either to notice is. Im not saying what they are doing is right, im just saying that no one has noticed it directly that I know of.



posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 09:10 AM
link   
reply to post by ThinkingCap
 


The man is the second video is a complete and utter moron.

His comments are nothing short of slander.

A Christian Fundamentalist referring to The little Mermaid as 'child pornography' has to have his head buried deep in the sand, and I mean real deep. His Bible that he carries around has to be one of the most violent books ever written. Its sex scenes, complete with depiction of incest and rape would give even Larry Flynt a good run for his money. It has to be one of the most disgusting books ever published in all of history.

If he thinks the shading on the towers of an undersea castle looks like a penis, I can just as easily say that the microphone he is spurring his venom from is a dick. Pervert.

Pocahontas is based on an historical figure!!! But he chooses to believe that "uttering her name
calls the devil on your side and on your children sides!" The fact that he uses the general term "Indian" instead of the actual tribe or language is very telling. Wiki says that the name means "little wanton" in the Powhatan language. I'll take wiki over this idiot.

I very much doubt that Time Magazine has called The Lion King "the most dirty, perverse, and violent of all Disney's films", and that "the children who watch The Lion King today, will be the serial killers of tomorrow." There would be severe repercussions for Times Magazine in printing such libel. A risk, Time would simply not take.

Just then, he couldn't resist throwing in the usual fundamentalist slur against homosexuals and AIDS.

Shirley MacLaine did not sing any of the song on The Lion King soundtrack. This is a complete lie and fabrication. Even if she did, I very much doubt that her music is "from HELL" and "dedicated to the DEVIL." (I'm surprise he didn't take the opportunity to take a stab at Elton John here, an easy target for men of such character.)

You really have to squint hard to see the word 'sex' form from the dust particles. Again only a perverted Christian would even think of that.

I don’t think I’ll be bothering with the rest of videos. I wasted enough time of this thrash already.




posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by beyondrainbow
 


If Walt could see what a pro-communist company it has become...

examples?

Do you realize the differences between Stalinist Communist and socialist.

You can have socialism on the totalitarian or on the libertarian scale.

Socialist itself, is certainly not bad.

Do you enjoy the roads you drive on? The education you receive? The Firefighters who put out the flames if/when your house catches fire? Socialism.

Do you enjoy clean water for drinking and bathing? The air you breathe? You can thank environmental legislation brought on by socialism.

How about the Internet you are presently reading this very post? You got it... socialism.

Would you rather all these items be left to our ever-friendly corporate giants? Of course, all these things are being more and more privatized. Maybe you'll be happy then...

Strangely, only in America is socialism a 'dirty' word. (Forgive me for assuming you are American.)
edit on 30/12/10 by ConspiracyNut23 because: grammar



posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Gabrielle.Black
 


We are basically making the governments of our world out to be the bad guys, and the people who in other countries that are third world countries as non corrupt.

No one is saying that the leaders of those countries are not corrupt. (check out Peter Eigen: How to expose the corrupt, if your interested in corruption itself)

What you might want to look into is the role the US had to play at the Brettonwoods Conference when it created the IMF and the World Bank. These two organizations alone pretty much decide the faith of the Third World. In fact, they function pretty much exactly as colonialism did centuries ago. There is just no way that these countries will ever recover from our (the First World) raping and pillaging of their lands and resources under their present condition.

Believe me, nobody is mistaking the United States for a saint.

edit on 30/12/10 by ConspiracyNut23 because: removed unnecessary jab



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 03:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Wally Hope
 


Oh, of the whole "pagan" etymology I am fully aware, but its also what I feel applies best. As far as the whole "which (or witch) religion killed more people" debate goes, I think it would likely be fair if we simply shook metaphorical hands and agreed that EVERY religion has blood on its hands, though that doesn't stop them from still being a source of hope to the various masses



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by HarmonicNights
reply to post by ThinkingCap
 


It may be distasteful to place subliminal sexual images in children's films, but I wouldn't call it "evil". Most likely they just did it as a joke. It doesn't mean they're pedophiles trying to "groom" children. Most kids would probably overlook them. That preacher went a little overboard with the sensationalism.

Anyway, I'd like to know what your thoughts are on Walt Disney? I've heard negative rumors about him, but he seemed like a genuinley great guy who cared for children. It's just hard to believe that he would be associated with anything evil. Sure, Disney is corrupt NOW like the rest of the entertainment industry, but I think Walt would strongly disapprove.


What? Anyway about Walt dont really know myself about him but do know that the masses are never going to be sold by way of bloody human sacrifice and the like but they could be sold a Yellow Brick Road. Not a bad witch but a Good Witch. Not Lavey but Harry Potter.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeadJester
reply to post by Wally Hope
 


Oh, of the whole "pagan" etymology I am fully aware, but its also what I feel applies best. As far as the whole "which (or witch) religion killed more people" debate goes, I think it would likely be fair if we simply shook metaphorical hands and agreed that EVERY religion has blood on its hands, though that doesn't stop them from still being a source of hope to the various masses


I agree, I wasn't comparing Paganism with anything, just commenting on someones naive view is all.

I'm not a christian, nor do I support any organized religion.





new topics
top topics
 
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join