It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by itsawild1
Let me ask you something. If we left all the battlefields do you honestly believe that they (islamic jihadists) would stop trying to kill us? That we'd see no more 9/11's. No more railway bombings? No more marketplace bombings?
If al it took for wars to end was one side just "leaving" don't you think we'd have done that already?
I mean, seriously!
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Romekje
But you're ignoring the other two examples.
We weren't in Afghanistan or Iraq when the twin towers were attacked. Either time. Whether it was under Bill Clinton's watch or Bush's. I suppose we could just surrender and allow Al Qieda to walk all over us, give them what they want. We could wave the white flag.
Just let any nutjob with a bomb threaten us and we could give up at the drop of a hat.
Originally posted by RomekjeWhat he is talking about is that if the USA would not spend these amounts of "money" on law enforcement, the false war on terror, and their general thirst for war and simply use what they NEED instead of what they WANT to control their own populace, that leftover budget could feed the entire world for years to come, or simply fix your own country overnight (as an example ofc)
Originally posted by Violater1Exqueeze me but, what are you talking about?
Originally posted by loner007 reply to post by Violater1So instead of dealing with your social issues in which 99% of crime is related to you(sic) rather spend money on making the country look like the inside of a prison instead of spending money on social issues, well it seems to me like everyone else in america(sic) you got it backwards.edit on 23-12-2010 by Violater1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
reply to post by abecedarian
I am SICK AND TIRED of the those that ATTEMPT to defend the Democrats or attack the Republicans when they BOTH do pretty much the same damn things.
At least the Tea Party has attempted to reign in the tyrants in the rethug party.
What does the Dems come to the table with? Oh the Coffee party which calls for more control of people, more taxes, more military, more government, and my personal favorite..............
The sexual assault of people boarding planes and furtherance of the PATRIOT ACT. HYPOCRITES!
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
reply to post by abecedarian
Not so subtle..............
Originally posted by Romekje
There IS a complete breakdown of how the 725b is calculated but that's probably just propaganda to save face. How does the US govt keep justifying this to the people? Here in NL the populace totally freaked when our royal prince spent a few tax euro's too much (below 100K) on a private trip/vacation. We're talking billions here and it's not the first time this happens.
In my opinion the US got themselves into a vicious circle of budget cuts, and then defense budget boosts to cope with the rising unrest in the nation.
It makes me wonder when people in the US will actually have had enough.
When the television starts showing actual news and reports about current events again instead of "Supermodels dancing on ice", that day might actually come sometime.
Originally posted by beezzer
Things like mobile watchtowers and fusion centres you mean?
That's more government than military. Ask any common military folk and they'd probably agree with most everything on this site!
The government can plan all they want, they can play their games all they want. But anything THAT draconian would have to involve the bread and butter military folks and THEY would not go along with that.
Again, just my two cents.
In addition, Pentagon spending has increased by 100 percent since 1998 and “the Obama budget plans to spend more on the Pentagon over eight years than any administration has since World War II.” [2]