posted on Dec, 26 2010 @ 07:16 AM
reply to post by mikelee
No, your assumption is not reasonable. Extend it to the wider criminal world. Are you seriously saying that no-one could be convicted of a crime if
there is no photographic evidence ? The gun at the scene was registered to the suspected perp, his fingerprints were all over, he had no alibi, the
victim was blackmailing him, he had threatened the victim's life to all and sundry but, oh dear, no pics or video, no case. Is that what you are
Fact is there is a mass of evidence that AA 77 hit the Pentagon. There are many eyewitnesses to it. Some say it was a passenger jetliner, some say it
was a Boeing passenger jetliner, some say it was a Boeing 757 passenger jetliner. ( one eyewitness even picked up a bit and donated it to the
Smithsonian, care to prove it is not part of a Boeing 757 ?) None say it was a missile.
Radar, Air Traffic Control, the crew of a nearby C130 and the aircrafts' flight data recorder all place AA 77 at the Pentagon. An Australian
researcher, Warren Stutt has recently teased the last few seconds of incomplete frames from the FDR which gives a final radar altitude of 4 feet
accompanied by off the scale decellaration.
Then there is the physical evidence at the scene. Body parts dna identified as belonging to passengers and crew of AA 77. Plane parts, all compatible
with a Boeing 757 and not with a missile, actually embedded in concrete structures within the Pentagon. How exactly was that "placed " in a raging
And, finally, what exactly was the point in hi-jacking AA 77 and disappearing the passengers just to fly something else into the Pentagon ?
So no, lack of photographic evidence other than the security camera shots, means nothing in relation to all the other evidence.