It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WikiLeaks to publish 'sensitive' Israel cables

page: 2
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 05:19 PM
link   




posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by FalselyFlagged
 


Will wait and see what is released..
I just wish wiki would post them rather than say they will..

The article doesn't mention a date for release..



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 08:19 PM
link   


posted on 21-12-2010 @ 07:20 AM

Originally posted by Zamini
reply to post by DerbyCityLights
 


Edit:

Does anyone else feel that revelations on Israel are on the verge of being released? The MSM seems to have blocked out Wikileaks as much as possible since last week.


Well what do you know, I was correct in my assumption! Does anyone else enjoy the implications of this post?

Feel free to spell the implications out!


Edit:

Link to post: www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 24-12-2010 by Zamini because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zamini


posted on 21-12-2010 @ 07:20 AM

Originally posted by Zamini
reply to post by DerbyCityLights
 


Edit:

Does anyone else feel that revelations on Israel are on the verge of being released? The MSM seems to have blocked out Wikileaks as much as possible since last week.


Well what do you know, I was correct in my assumption! Does anyone else enjoy the implications of this post?

Feel free to spell the implications out!


Edit:

Link to post: www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 24-12-2010 by Zamini because: (no reason given)


Surely you are not suggesting those that own most or our MSN are censoring these leaks.???
Sometimes it's just so obvious..



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 08:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by thecinic
 


Go away.

You offer nothing of substance to wikileaks-related threads.


I thought that this post was removed.

Regardless, we don't really need leaks to know where Israel stands.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 08:39 PM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 



Surely you are not suggesting those that own most or our MSN are censoring these leaks.???


Interesting question, reminds me of a question posed to the Shah of Iran. Allow me to post a video.




Brilliant, simply brilliant.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 08:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Zamini
 


Good vid and well aware of the jewish influence 35 years ago..
I also like how he refused to be baited into answering questions without looking at the facts..
Good interview..Thanks...



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:00 PM
link   
Will be interesting to see how the newspapers will translate:

US Diplomats at the American Embassy in Israel reporting back (email/cables) to US State Department of the events, social, politics, economic trade, etc to do with Israel and surrounding area ....

USA being Israels main ally ... USA Interest Israel Interest



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ellen15
Will be interesting to see how the newspapers will translate:

US Diplomats at the American Embassy in Israel reporting back (email/cables) to US State Department of the events, social, politics, economic trade, etc to do with Israel and surrounding area ....

USA being Israels main ally ... USA Interest Israel Interest


I don't think I'll be looking to MSM for Israeli leaks..
There are other sources with shall I say, just a little less bias



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by FalselyFlagged
 


Thank you.. a lot of people here like to count their conspiracies before they hatch.

I've tried a million times to tell these guys when it's all said and done you can form your opinion, but they weren't seeing what they wanted in the first few weeks so for some reason jumped to the insane conclusion that they never would and it must be a conspiracy.

I actually think a lot of the WL organization follow along and have the real scoop on the conspiracies we hit around on here. If you notice. Look at what they have made points about. Special attention given to a huge bank, and to Israel.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:33 PM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


I actually think a lot of the WL organization follow along and have the real scoop on the conspiracies we hit around on here. If you notice. Look at what they have made points about. Special attention given to a huge bank, and to Israel.


It's funny...Many threads and posters are saying wiki is controled by Mossad and that's why there is so little about Israel in the leaks..
You say that Israel gets Special attention..
I'm so confused..



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:39 PM
link   
Alls I'm sayin' is if they are run by the Mossad it seems strange that WikiLeaks would work and give info to a well known Holocause denier. Now it is unlikely WL has an agenda against the jewish or are deniers themselves, but they do work with controversial "journalists" willing to seek a different "truth."

reason.com...


edit on 24-12-2010 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 

Thanks, I read the article..
To be honest I'm not a fan of the phrases anti-semitic or holocaust denier..

I don't like a lot of things Israel does as I don't like things other countries do..
I also question the details of the holocaust and the focus only on jewish deaths..

Am I anti-semitic and a holocaust denier.??
Many would say yes..I disagree...



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


I am enjoying the leak that says Israel bombed a Syrian nuclear reactor weeks before it made the headlines.

Weeks, before, it, made, the, headlines.

I wonder how much damage control we will see in the news the coming days. I loved the fact that on the Dutch website the article was between '....', as if it were not really true but just an assumption or claim. Again, in zionist controlled media.



Also, how Bush claims he resisted pressure from the Israelis to bomb the Syrian site in his memoires. OOPS.



Game's up.

Edit: Messed up the lay out.
edit on 24-12-2010 by Zamini because: (no reason given)


Edit 2: Correcting myself due to misinterpretation of GogoVicMorrow's post.
edit on 24-12-2010 by Zamini because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by DevilJin
 



I am still waiting on the Russian leaks that were supposedly given to a news source in Russia recently.


Not to sure if you mean finding the source documents on Wikileaks or reading media reports on it but
the cables have been reported on in Russian media. To keep up, it's probably best to watch Russian news sites and media and translate them for yourself. If you wait for the English speaking media to pick them up, you could be waiting forever.


Russia is a "mafia state" that works closely with organized crime networks to extort business, persecute rivals, rig elections, and traffic weapons. These are some of the allegations contained in the latest batch of secret U.S. diplomatic cables revealed by the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks and published by several newspapers.


www.rferl.org...



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Zamini
 


Did you even read what I wrote? I didn't shoot myself in the foot.

P.S. I'm pro-wikileaks. Try reading with a little comprehension instead of just recognizing the words mossad and wikileaks in the same sentence and assuming you understand.
edit on 24-12-2010 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


I understood you were not against wikileaks, to be honest, it seemed confusing to me.


Try reading with a little comprehension instead of just recognizing the words mossad and wikileaks in the same sentence and assuming you understand.


Duely noted, thanks for the correction.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 


I meant this special attention, making a statement about it and telling about releasing plenty of cables about Israel in the future thus bringing special attention to those, which he knew what he was doing, he could have just released them and proved people wrong, but by addressing them he is painting these cables to stand out.

And well, as someone who follows this like I do, you know about the special attention given to Bank of America.

Consorting with and even discussing holocaust denial is meant to be scary and that's probably why you have reservations. It's the new scarlet letter. Honestly, I wouldn't be afraid to question it but I really in fact believe it happened, but I don't yell in disgust at people that don't. I've read their cases. I just think it happened, and if the numbers are botched it's still a travesty so I don't care. I was just pointing out WikiLeaks must have a similar temperament as me as the worked in an official way with a known denier.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 10:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Zamini
 


It's ok.. sorry I called you an "at"hole.



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by backinblack
 


I meant this special attention, making a statement about it and telling about releasing plenty of cables about Israel in the future thus bringing special attention to those, which he knew what he was doing, he could have just released them and proved people wrong, but by addressing them he is painting these cables to stand out.

And well, as someone who follows this like I do, you know about the special attention given to Bank of America.

Consorting with and even discussing holocaust denial is meant to be scary and that's probably why you have reservations. It's the new scarlet letter. Honestly, I wouldn't be afraid to question it but I really in fact believe it happened, but I don't yell in disgust at people that don't. I've read their cases. I just think it happened, and if the numbers are botched it's still a travesty so I don't care. I was just pointing out WikiLeaks must have a similar temperament as me as the worked in an official way with a known denier.


Wikileaks didn't make special mention of Israel..
Others have been doing that for weeks so I'd say their response is expected..

I don't want to go off topic but I do believe in the holocaust, just not sure on the figures..
But even so 50 million died in that war..To me THAT'S the bigger holocaust...



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join