It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by habfan1968
I see that the person that was caught turn out not to be part of the Iranian guard, great. However to those of you who have been spanking Slayer for jumping to conclusions, do you people actually think that Iran is not involved in supplying weapons to those who want to fight the US military in that part of the world?
Originally posted by habfan1968
reply to post by forklift
At some point they will pay the price for that.
Originally posted by ANNED
No problem as now we have trading material for the Americans held in Iran.(Shane Bauer, Joshua Fattal)
freethehikers.org...
Now we will see how much Iran values there officer.
Originally posted by AnotherYOU
reply to post by ANNED
Don't you know Iran is a Tyrannical and Opressive Regime where everyone is expendable, if they sent him there he probably isn't of much value right? Plus they are terrorists running a country, i thought the US didn't negotiate with terrorists?
(just fund them )
Originally posted by Truth_Hz
Originally posted by AnotherYOU
Plus weren't the al-quds Palestinian brigades? Now they are Iranians?
You're both right and wrong here!!
Al-Quds is quite a common term (meaning The Noble or Sacred Place??) which is the Arabic name for Jerusalem??
The Al-Quds brigade is indeed part of the PIJ however there is also the Al-Quds of Iran or Quds Force
Iranian forces
However as you say lump em all into one big news report and stir up some more support for the government while you're at it!!
Originally posted by sapien82
propaganda !
I believe this to be nothing more, now lets see how Obama takes this with his military advisors.
then lets see how the UK government decides to follow in tow into another illegal war!
I predict yes predict , that we will hear how iran has illegaly armed terrorist nations , then wikileaks will release cables with this information , then US will invade Iran with the help of nato and the UK
much to the dislike of russia and china !
Another illegal war to make money for a failing economy , shock doctrine style
US will go in and clean up , then give haliburton a fat contract , so that the money can be used to fund election campaigns for those who want to rule the world
Am I that for off on that one , or am I just saying aloud what we all know will happen
Originally posted by DevilJin
A side note: what does Al-Quds means. I read that and thought Al-Qaeda misspelled or something.
Originally posted by habfan1968
I see that the person that was caught turn out not to be part of the Iranian guard, great. However to those of you who have been spanking Slayer for jumping to conclusions, do you people actually think that Iran is not involved in supplying weapons to those who want to fight the US military in that part of the world?
Originally posted by forklift
Originally posted by habfan1968
I see that the person that was caught turn out not to be part of the Iranian guard, great. However to those of you who have been spanking Slayer for jumping to conclusions, do you people actually think that Iran is not involved in supplying weapons to those who want to fight the US military in that part of the world?
Well if Israel and US can sabotage Iranian nuclear facillities using next-gen viruses,kill iranian scientists and fund anti-government groups, than doesn't Iran have the right to do the same?
Or shall we ignore what the West does and blame Iran for everything?
And it would be nice to see the US millitary actually getting into some challenging warfare rather than using kids and women for target practise sessions.
Originally posted by BiGGz
It's weird that Iran is funding an organization they've had their problems with in the past. Iran and Taliban haven't really seen 'eye to eye', more like 'eye for eye'.
I see this as more propaganda to give justification for any future attacks/invasions on Iran.edit on 25-12-2010 by BiGGz because: (no reason given)