It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Explosions hit Chilean, Swiss embassies in Rome

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Explosions hit Chilean, Swiss embassies in Rome


www.cbc.ca

No one has claimed responsibility for either of the embassy attacks in Rome.

Earlier on Thursday, a package detonated at the Chilean Embassy, slightly wounding an administrative official, Chile's foreign minister said. It was the second such attack in the Italian capital, coming just hours after an explosion at the Swiss Embassy.
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Funny thing is no claimed responsibility for the attacks, only the government and the media are blaming it on the anarchists without proof.



People who are either rising up agaisnt or are protesting agaisnt there own governments are been now called Anarchists and in some news articles the media would claim that the protests are been set up by a Labour union.

example
"Labour unions stepping up protests"


There is a revolution happening in Eupore and Canadians are clueless about it, on the cbc comment section they don't even know whats a bankster.


On The CBC comment section people have been calling the Anarchists or the protests cowards, terrorists.

here's an snippet from the comment section

"Take note everyone. This is how a coward fights his/her battles. They hide behind the innocent and do these types of crimes. If caught there should be a imediate trail and treason should be the charge. The only punishment should be execution. What ever happened to, "Peace on earth and good will towards man"

The problem with the comment the elites don't care for peace on earth.


So what do you think on this story?


www.cbc.ca
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 23-12-2010 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 03:33 PM
link   
I think it brings to light the thought that there really is no reason to protest anything for anything if the protesters can be set up and framed. I think that protests are made to get public attention. For example, if there is a change getting pushed threw the system fast thats kinda shady and is purposely not being talked about to avoid public outrage or voting no on something they would rather not vote no on, like when they hide shady crap in bills exc exc, or when some new horror on earth is being erected in your neighborhood and no one knows about it or the radioactive death pollution that comes with it, a protest can bring these issues to light by forcing the media to give attention to the protesters and why they are protesting. Therefore, a protest can have an ability to effect the outcome of said issues/events. In the very least, if the media chooses not to cover it, just driving by 10,000 people screaming with signs in your car on your way to work is gonna spike your curiosity. Your probably gonna read some signs and wonder whats going on. When a protest is going on, it becomes a battle for PR. (generally I would assume) This gives whoever has control over the media an immediate upper hand. In fact, whoever has control over the media has already won this war. There is nothing to be gained but more flaming from the media for these protests. Time and time again it has been reported that the police set up fake protesters to turn a protest violent, in turn making the protesters into bad guys and the issue, being represented by the protesters, (seeing as they are the only ones that care and what people see when they hear of said issue for the first time) as the "bad guy" issue as well. I think "terrorist" is just another word for bad guy. Like the villian in batman or something. The only thing that happens in protests is bad for the protesters. Assuming that the protest is a non-violent protest held to gain attention of said issue.

NOW, if the only way to win public relations is the control the media, then the protesters would have to control the media. Seeing as the media pretty much controls the people nowadays, sad as that is to say. Sooo, wouldn't a fund raiser be alot more affective, or just making lots and lots of money, and paying off the media? Wouldn't that be the only way?

Media = controls people

Money = controls media

Money = god (once again,
)


edit on 23-12-2010 by poopmaster because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-12-2010 by poopmaster because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-12-2010 by poopmaster because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 04:03 PM
link   
Already a thread on this..



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


Several threads on this .. Check my one out which links to the other 2 threads about a possible CIA connection.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 23 2010 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by maythetruthbeknown
 


Thanks didn't notice



posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 12:31 AM
link   
This is really horrible and bad ,and hope peace can come back there.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join