Martian Anomaly - PIA08557, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 24-12-2010 @ 11:39 AM by TribeOfManyColours
Originally posted by Heliocentric


Source link:

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

When I find a Mars or Moon anomaly picture that really intrigues me, I've almost made it into a habit to pop over to the Department of Geology (at the university where I work) and show it to a friend.

I ask him what it is, and when he seems a bit perplexed and ask me what region the anomaly is from, I tell him something like "The Aristarchus plateau on the Moon" with a grin. Why make it easy for him?

So I came across this THEMIS picture (courtesy of JPL) that looks like... well, good question. I consulted my geologist friend again what kind of geological process could create this, his reaction was; "Is this one of your Mars pictures again?" I guess I've been over there a bit too often lately.

In any case, he had no clear answer, not being an extraterrestial geologist. Certain features in this anomaly does remind me of fossilized exoskeleton organisms present here on Earth. Not that I want to make that connection just yet, because why would any presumed fossilized Martian organism look anything like an Earth organism? Another problem is the size of this thing. A paleontological guess was of course excluded to my friend. "If you got it from the internet, my guess is it's fake" was his last word. The problem is, it comes straight from NASA's own server, so if it's fake we have another problem on our hands.

NASA generally have ready-to-go explanations for most Martian anomalies, but they seem a bit stumped by this one, even if they do refer to it as a "sand dune".



A Trilobite fossil

Perhaps someone with in-depth knowledge of geology or asteroid impacts could help me out here. Could an impact create this type of skidmark, do similar examples exist here on Earth or on nearby planets and moons?

Analytical skills are more welcome than your out-of-the-box guesses, but please hit me with what you've got!


The second one is a fossilized stone. Where the supposed legs are the biggest, you can see little cuts and chips of the stone. Done for revealing the complete legs for display in museum or something

If not. Then that's a humongous fossilised animal on Mars, and then you can assume that the first picture is draco's old skin bin shed of or something
edit on 24-12-2010 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-12-2010 @ 08:00 PM by ArMaP
Originally posted by Nomadmonkey
As stated by others in previous posts, i think this is a glancing blow "Wound" caused by a large object.
The "wound" is not dug into the ground, it's above ground.

Seeing that the light comes from the left (in the direction of the arrow in the image below), you can see that the lightened side is the left, meaning that it's not something like a "scratch" of the ground.

And in a full size, brightened, image you can see that they are dunes.
(click for full size)


This may even have been caused by the Mars moon Phobos. Phobos has the closest orbit of any moon at only around 5800 miles.
Not very likely (if this was some kind of "wound"), in the above image north is at the top of the image, and that means that Phobos was on an almost polar orbit when it made that "wound".

Also, the "wound" is 6 km wide and Phobos has a mean radius of 11 km, so, to leave a "wound" like that it would need to bury a large percentage of its body in the ground, and I don't think it could keep in orbit after that, it's too small to keep enough energy to go back to orbit after such a hit.


reply posted on 25-12-2010 @ 07:26 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by neonitus


What we see on that photo is something like 51 or 52 km long, but it's longer than that, the photo doesn't show the whole feature.

This is what it looks like.
(click for bigger image)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^