It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
It's just a fatal flaw in SETI, it's a good idea, but I just don't get why they think they will find anything using radio waves.
Originally posted by whatukno
Simply put, if the Drake Equation is correct, and there are all sorts of intelligent life out there. The sad fact is, radio waves travel too slowly for interstellar communication. By the time we receive a signal from a civilization, it may be thousands of years old and that civilization may be long gone.
And what if that civilization doesn't use radio waves in order to communicate? What if they use some other means, some other form of energy that does travel faster than light?
It's just a fatal flaw in SETI, it's a good idea, but I just don't get why they think they will find anything using radio waves.
There's also a video of Jill Tarter discussing this: www.ted.com...
"'Are we alone?' Humans have been asking [this question] forever. The probability of success is difficult to estimate but if we never search the chance of success is zero."
Jill Tarter
(Carl Sagan): in 1982, when I put together a petition published in Science urging the scientific respectability of SETI...The petition proposed that, instead of arguing the issue, we look:
"We are unanimous in our conviction that the only significant test of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence is an experimental one. No a priori arguments on this subject can be compelling or should be used as a substitute for an observational program."
Originally posted by Juggernutty
If a civilization was advanced enough, they would probably be able to measure the disruption in space.
Take for instance the example that if you took a giant impervious stick, and stretched it from earth to the moon...if you move one end of the stick, it should move on the other end instantaneously, regardless of distance. (of course, we do not have an impervious pole, so we cant do this...but that was simply an example)
I think just as we can detect a black hole by the way space is altered around it, they would also be able tod etect the disruption caused by our radio waves.
Originally posted by whatukno
And what if that civilization doesn't use radio waves in order to communicate? What if they use some other means, some other form of energy that does travel faster than light?
Originally posted by whatukno
Simply put, if the Drake Equation is correct, and there are all sorts of intelligent life out there. The sad fact is, radio waves travel too slowly for interstellar communication. By the time we receive a signal from a civilization, it may be thousands of years old and that civilization may be long gone.
Radio waves still travel at the speed of light, which means if an intelligent civilization is 10,000 light years away, it would take a signal 10,000 years to reach us.
And what if that civilization doesn't use radio waves in order to communicate? What if they use some other means, some other form of energy that does travel faster than light?
It's just a fatal flaw in SETI, it's a good idea, but I just don't get why they think they will find anything using radio waves.
Then please explain what your point is more clearly because your OP did imply you thought it was about communication, and not detection: Remember this?
Originally posted by whatukno
1. I know what SETI stands for, please don't insult my intelligence. I know it's not about contact or communication, but about detection. That wasn't my point.
That sure sounds like it refers to communication.
Originally posted by whatukno
The sad fact is, radio waves travel too slowly for interstellar communication. By the time we receive a signal from a civilization, it may be thousands of years old and that civilization may be long gone.
So let's say that tomorrow morning we detect a signal that left the source 50,000 years ago, and we determine that it was likely created by an intelligent civilization.
2. Looking for a radio signal from an extraterrestrial society in my opinion is pointless. Say the civilization is 50,000 light years away, that means that the radio signal would take 50,000 years before it would reach us. It's entirely possible that we won't receive that signal for thousands of years.
So what are the chances of aliens 430 light years away having a 7 mile wide or 500 mile wide antenna? Hard to say since if they are alien we don't know much about them. But this example does give you some idea of the difficulties involved in detecting a signal more than a few hundred light years away.
Shostak calculates that Nasa's recent broadcast of Beatles music towards Polaris, the North Star, using a 210ft antenna and 20kW of power, would require any potential aliens to have an antenna seven miles across to be aware of it. To actually receive it as music, this would need to be increased to a 500-mile wide antenna. Polaris is 430 light years away.
Then please explain what your point is more clearly because your OP did imply you thought it was about communication, and not detection
So let's say that tomorrow morning we detect a signal that left the source 50,000 years ago, and we determine that it was likely created by an intelligent civilization.
Isn't there a point to knowing this? That 50,000 years ago, there was an intelligent civilization capable of generating a signal?
I suspect that for technical reasons, our best chances of detection will be within a few hundred, or maybe a thousand light years. While it's not impossible to detect something 50,000 light years away or further, the source at a larger distance needs to be extremely strong to be detected above background noise. If our own TV signals are any example (and they are the ONLY example of civilized intelligent electromagnetic emissions we have), they are probably not powerful enough to be detected above background noise, more than a few hundred light years away except by an extremely large radio telescope array:
Can our TV signals be picked up on other planets?
So what are the chances of aliens 540 light years away having a 7 mile wide or 500 mile wide antenna? Hard to say since if they are alien we don't know much about them. But this example does give you some idea of the difficulties involved in detecting a signal more than a few hundred light years away.
Shostak calculates that Nasa's recent broadcast of Beatles music towards Polaris, the North Star, using a 210ft antenna and 20kW of power, would require any potential aliens to have an antenna seven miles across to be aware of it. To actually receive it as music, this would need to be increased to a 500-mile wide antenna. Polaris is 430 light years away.