It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 94
203
<< 91  92  93    95  96  97 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


There were 3 Quakes (changed by now) after the Big One,they added 3 new ones already. I would trust EMSC over USGS any Day ,because USGS downgrades and adds or removes Quakes all the Time.

Edit: just refreshed USGS,they are adding them now...slowpokes

edit on 11-4-2011 by Shenon because: (no reason given)


Edit 2:


Ok,WTF is going on there?
edit on 11-4-2011 by Shenon because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


No idea! It seems to be on land although as it changes magnitude it is moving around.



If it could cause a tsunami I would have thought that the wave would be going away from the coast not towards it like those wave machines at swimming pools.


The text on the right belongs to the orb on the left and vice versa.


edit on 11/4/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Shenon
 


Yup, they just all came in to my database, I said wait an hour!! It usually sorts itself out.

They must be very similar details as they all turned up as duplicates.


Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-04-11 02:26:35, 37.738, 142.408, 4.6, 21.6, Off N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 04:51:46, 37.538, 141.210, 5.0, 29.1, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 08:16:13, 37.007, 140.477, 6.6, 10.0, Eastern Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 08:26:31, 37.102, 140.445, 5.2, 15.0, Eastern Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 08:33:54, 36.990, 140.262, 4.7, 24.8, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 08:58:04, 37.012, 140.358, 5.0, 17.1, Eastern Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 09:05:21, 37.040, 140.566, 4.9, 30.1, Eastern Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 09:12:34, 36.905, 140.439, 4.7, 25.1, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 09:17:12, 37.744, 142.583, 4.8, 20.5, Off N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-11 09:30:35, 37.050, 140.498, 4.7, 12.2, Eastern Honshu. Japan


All on both EMSC and USGS.





edit on 11/4/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:04 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Do you still think this was an Aftershock of the 9.0?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:05 AM
link   
Mag 5.1 Hawkes Bay New Zealand today 12.30pm local time.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:06 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Yeah, that's what I am saying. If it was under land, I can't see how it could create an incoming wave that apparently did hit the shore. Something ain't right. That's for darn sure.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Shenon
 


As far as I can see yes as the levels of seismicity have not return to normal before the big one as this graph shows.




posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Sorry,have to disagree with you on the Point that this was an Aftershock...

And another one just hit...again,on the same Spot (This makes 7 Aftershocks in the Location of the Big "Aftershock" )

USGS Link



4.9 2011/04/11 09:36:22 36.914 140.393 15.2 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 09:30:35 37.050 140.498 12.2 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 09:12:34 36.906 140.440 25.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.9 2011/04/11 09:05:22 37.041 140.566 30.1 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
5.0 2011/04/11 08:58:04 37.013 140.358 17.1 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 08:33:54 36.990 140.263 24.8 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
5.2 2011/04/11 08:26:31 37.103 140.446 15.0 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
6.6 2011/04/11 08:16:13 37.007 140.477 10.0 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Shenon
 


Very weird, GE is not showing any of those and the 6.6 is still showing 7.1

I have no idea. It would need a seismologist to determine that. In accordance with the accepted definition they are still aftershocks. If a seismologist says they are aftershocks of the 6.6 or 7.1 or whatever it is then that's fine.

Incidentally why could they not be aftershocks to an aftershock?


edit on 11/4/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shenon
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Sorry,have to disagree with you on the Point that this was an Aftershock...

And another one just hit...again,on the same Spot (This makes 7 Aftershocks in the Location of the Big "Aftershock" )

USGS Link



4.9 2011/04/11 09:36:22 36.914 140.393 15.2 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 09:30:35 37.050 140.498 12.2 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 09:12:34 36.906 140.440 25.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.9 2011/04/11 09:05:22 37.041 140.566 30.1 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
5.0 2011/04/11 08:58:04 37.013 140.358 17.1 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/04/11 08:33:54 36.990 140.263 24.8 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
5.2 2011/04/11 08:26:31 37.103 140.446 15.0 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN
6.6 2011/04/11 08:16:13 37.007 140.477 10.0 EASTERN HONSHU, JAPAN


Actually, after looking this, I think you might be correct:

www.jma.go.jp...

This could be a new source mechanism, because of the sheer frequency, amount and location of new aftershocks of this "aftershock".

And I will further qualify this: activity at MAJO has definitely picked up in GEE, and is behaving similarly to a mainshock/aftershock sequence.
edit on Mon Apr 11th 2011 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:29 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Not quite sure what that JMA site is saying. I guess it depends on the definition you use for an aftershock. If they are using their intensity scale as a guide then that has nothing to do with magnitude so you can throw the definition of of the window.

At the end of the day what does it matter? They are earthquakes. Whether they are foreshocks or aftershocks or afternoon shocks is actually fairly irrelevant in the great scheme of things.

As i said


Incidentally why could they not be aftershocks to an aftershock?


That does not make the 6.6 NOT an aftershock of the 9.0 which was the original question.


edit on 11/4/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:30 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Yep,alot more than we see on USGS or EMSC (both just added a new one...it doesn´t stop)...and all in the same Location?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
Whether they are foreshocks or aftershocks or afternoon shocks is actually fairly irrelevant in the great scheme of things.


Not sure a seismologist would see it that way. If this is a new source mechanism that has activated, I am sure it will be identified and studied as such in relation to the Japan Trench. I can't see how the discovery of a potentially new extension of an existing fault is irrelevant. It is very relevant.

And as we speak, MAJO continues twitching with small quakes. And before you say "Are you SURE those are small quakes?"

Yep. They are registering at G.INU as well, just far enough away to provide confirmation and ruling out man made activity.
edit on Mon Apr 11th 2011 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:23 AM
link   



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:29 AM
link   
Thought I'd let you guys, know that the 7.1 M or 6.6 M quake in Japan seems to have coincided with a CME that supposedly arrived on earth today...

Check thread for more details: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'm no expert in this but, just wanted know if CME's maybe a cause in this increased EQ worldwide, since the Sun itself is active lately???

edit on 11-4-2011 by InnerPeace2012 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 10:23 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Obviously a humour failure has occurred on my part.

It does not matter in the sense that there are more important things in life than fault systems in a country far away when there are family matters to attend to. My apologies. That area became active in 1964


Your search parameters are:

* catalog=ANSS
* start_time=1900/01/01,00:00:00
* end_time=2011/04/11,23:23:59
* minimum_latitude=36.45
* maximum_latitude=37.15
* minimum_longitude=140.25
* maximum_longitude=140.75
* minimum_magnitude=0
* maximum_magnitude=10
* event_type=E

DateTime,Latitude,Longitude,Depth,Magnitude,MagType,NbStations,Gap,Distance,RMS,Source,EventID
1963/05/12 02:57:15.50,36.5000,140.6000,33.00,4.90,Mb,10,,,0.00,NEI,1963051240
1964/04/17 02:58:27.00,36.7000,140.5000,68.00,4.90,Mb,20,,,0.00,NEI,1964041740
1964/11/14 05:56:47.80,36.6000,140.3000,90.00,4.90,Mb,18,,,0.00,NEI,1964111440
1964/11/23 18:55:35.30,36.7000,140.7000,81.00,4.60,Mb,12,,,0.00,NEI,1964112340
1964/12/20 23:14:45.90,36.6000,140.3000,83.00,4.30,Mb,8,,,0.00,NEI,1964122040
1965/05/13 06:58:24.80,36.7000,140.5000,132.00,4.20,Mb,7,,,0.00,NEI,1965051340
1965/10/10 15:50:07.90,36.5000,140.3000,102.00,3.70,Mb,8,,,0.00,NEI,1965101040
1965/10/22 00:49:35.70,37.0000,140.7000,117.00,4.20,Mb,12,,,0.00,NEI,1965102240
1966/02/18 00:27:53.90,36.5000,140.5000,74.00,5.50,Mb,60,,,0.00,NEI,1966021840
1966/05/22 16:43:16.80,36.7000,140.7000,53.00,4.50,Mb,11,,,0.00,NEI,1966052240
1966/09/18 00:35:18.90,37.1000,140.6000,85.00,4.40,Mb,31,,,0.00,NEI,1966091840
1967/04/17 12:01:13.70,37.1090,140.7450,25.00,3.80,Mb,8,,,0.00,NEI,1967041740
1967/07/02 01:06:15.00,36.6000,140.6000,49.00,4.20,Mb,11,,,0.00,NEI,1967070240
1967/08/02 13:36:38.00,36.7000,140.4000,65.00,3.80,Mb,8,,,0.00,NEI,1967080240
1967/10/01 04:09:09.30,36.9000,140.7000,113.00,3.80,Mb,7,,,0.00,NEI,1967100140
1968/01/05 08:22:40.00,36.9000,140.3000,79.00,4.10,Mb,12,,,0.00,NEI,1968010540
1968/04/07 10:59:30.70,36.7000,140.6000,33.00,4.10,Mb,9,,,0.00,NEI,1968040740
1968/11/18 17:17:17.10,36.4600,140.5310,55.00,4.30,Mb,11,,,0.00,NEI,1968111840
1969/03/10 15:52:45.40,36.4690,140.6260,59.00,4.30,Mb,11,,,0.00,NEI,1969031040
1969/05/22 11:40:49.60,36.5580,140.4350,66.00,4.50,Mb,18,,,0.00,NEI,1969052240
1970/02/04 10:17:46.20,36.5340,140.6340,59.00,4.80,Mb,35,,,0.00,NEI,1970020440
1970/07/11 14:28:15.50,36.4750,140.5120,67.00,5.20,Mb,54,,,0.00,NEI,1970071140
1971/05/08 16:31:06.00,36.4620,140.5600,66.00,4.00,Mb,11,,,0.00,NEI,1971050840
1972/03/05 12:03:31.60,37.0070,140.6730,68.00,4.10,Mb,12,,,0.00,NEI,1972030540
1973/06/19 22:31:18.50,36.4520,140.6130,65.00,5.20,Mb,66,,,0.00,NEI,1973061940
1973/07/22 01:37:33.50,36.4830,140.6220,62.00,3.80,Mb,18,,,0.00,NEI,1973072240
1973/07/31 16:51:17.10,36.5030,140.6480,61.00,4.60,Mb,34,,,0.00,NEI,1973073140
1973/08/21 08:08:49.70,36.5430,140.5360,53.00,3.50,Mb,7,,,0.00,NEI,1973082140
1973/12/11 05:39:09.10,36.7210,140.5970,90.00,4.00,Mb,7,,,0.00,NEI,1973121140
1974/09/28 16:01:08.70,36.4560,140.4990,70.00,4.50,Mb,23,,,0.00,NEI,1974092840
1974/11/04 01:26:15.10,36.6460,140.4120,106.00,3.90,Mb,12,,,0.00,NEI,1974110440
1975/04/21 03:45:14.90,36.5070,140.6400,58.00,5.10,Mb,73,,,0.00,NEI,1975042140
1975/08/29 08:38:46.90,36.5790,140.6260,62.00,4.30,Mb,13,,,0.00,NEI,1975082940
1976/02/22 01:12:24.30,36.4690,140.4840,98.00,4.90,Mb,70,,,0.00,NEI,1976022240
1976/05/13 20:28:53.30,36.4660,140.7340,64.00,4.70,Mb,22,,,0.00,NEI,1976051340
1976/12/13 02:55:58.90,36.7060,140.6580,109.00,4.50,Mb,20,,,0.00,NEI,1976121340
1977/04/19 06:14:59.60,36.4550,140.5560,65.00,5.30,Mb,145,,,0.00,NEI,1977041940
1978/04/19 10:47:52.30,36.4700,140.7060,61.00,4.60,Mb,29,,,0.00,NEI,1978041940
1978/07/05 05:08:23.80,36.4890,140.7080,64.00,4.50,Mb,17,,,0.00,NEI,1978070540
1978/09/19 17:53:23.10,36.8270,140.3020,121.00,4.30,Mb,18,,,0.00,NEI,1978091940
1979/03/19 22:40:36.50,36.6230,140.6890,107.00,4.30,Mb,13,,,0.00,NEI,1979031940
1979/09/15 11:45:40.00,36.6660,140.7310,97.00,3.70,Mb,14,,,0.00,NEI,1979091540
1979/12/16 23:23:48.40,36.4820,140.6200,66.00,4.80,Mb,25,,,0.00,NEI,1979121640
1981/09/27 10:11:28.03,36.9520,140.4160,98.70,4.00,Mb,7,,,0.94,NEI,1981092740
1982/11/09 23:37:16.20,36.5750,140.6200,110.80,5.00,Mb,72,,,1.10,NEI,1982110940
1983/01/04 10:28:49.45,36.6130,140.6240,103.00,4.70,Mb,64,,,0.84,NEI,1983010440
1983/02/17 17:49:15.77,36.7580,140.4290,121.20,4.40,Mb,13,,,0.72,NEI,1983021740
1983/06/19 17:37:09.64,36.5420,140.6400,63.10,3.90,Mb,10,,,0.73,NEI,1983061940
1983/07/21 01:15:50.55,36.5090,140.6360,62.20,4.40,Mb,14,,,0.62,NEI,1983072140
1983/11/30 02:02:19.18,37.0520,140.7110,77.20,4.70,Mb,10,,,1.13,NEI,1983113040
1984/07/28 18:47:56.90,36.6160,140.6750,64.70,4.00,Mb,9,,,1.26,NEI,1984072840
1984/10/30 16:15:07.73,36.4690,140.5780,70.20,4.80,Mb,24,,,0.96,NEI,1984103040
1984/12/27 05:54:16.26,36.5600,140.7230,58.50,4.30,Mb,12,,,0.73,NEI,1984122740
1985/06/09 08:23:03.94,36.5230,140.6800,63.00,4.50,Mb,15,,,0.68,NEI,1985060940
1985/06/18 05:24:49.65,36.5780,140.4260,119.60,4.10,Mb,11,,,0.36,NEI,1985061840
1986/04/05 00:29:45.12,36.5630,140.6360,60.00,3.90,Mb,9,,,0.75,NEI,1986040540
1986/09/20 03:04:58.79,36.4540,140.5200,74.70,5.10,Mb,126,,,1.19,NEI,1986092040
1986/11/29 13:30:20.53,36.4820,140.5600,123.10,4.50,Mb,8,,,0.60,NEI,1986112940
1987/01/08 23:05:30.96,36.5740,140.5280,71.20,4.80,Mb,22,,,1.33,NEI,1987010840
1987/03/10 00:37:44.58,36.4740,140.6880,80.80,5.10,Mb,47,,,1.01,NEI,1987031040
1988/01/26 06:59:29.80,36.4740,140.7150,100.00,4.50,Mb,22,,,0.86,NEI,1988012640
1988/01/29 21:18:48.26,36.7130,140.7280,77.10,5.00,Mb,71,,,1.08,NEI,1988012940
1988/05/19 17:32:51.80,37.0650,140.5670,97.50,4.40,Mb,16,,,0.82,NEI,1988051940
1989/09/04 07:12:35.78,37.1010,140.7360,87.90,4.50,Mb,37,,,0.98,NEI,1989090440
1991/07/23 14:53:47.36,36.5470,140.5890,112.00,4.60,Mb,12,,,0.61,NEI,1991072340
1991/12/30 23:38:17.92,36.6910,140.5800,87.60,4.30,Mb,18,,,1.02,NEI,1991123040
1992/05/11 10:07:50.86,36.4690,140.5240,59.10,5.20,Mb,208,,,1.04,NEI,1992051140
1992/11/05 07:39:04.33,36.4720,140.7480,64.60,4.10,Mb,13,,,0.98,NEI,1992110540
1992/11/05 22:35:49.63,36.4550,140.7100,68.20,4.40,Mb,27,,,0.65,NEI,1992110540
1994/09/06 10:00:02.97,36.4840,140.5730,66.60,4.90,Mb,39,,,0.88,NEI,1994090640
1995/06/22 18:03:20.78,36.5180,140.3800,117.10,4.50,Mb,45,,,0.86,NEI,1995062240
1995/09/11 23:17:00.79,36.6580,140.6010,71.00,4.10,Mb,17,,,1.20,NEI,1995091140
1996/05/15 00:29:04.93,36.7240,140.2880,101.90,3.90,Mb,19,,,0.70,NEI,1996051510
1998/10/31 18:00:58.98,36.5580,140.7420,57.30,4.60,Mb,21,,,0.80,NEI,1998103110
2000/10/04 11:00:07.34,37.0800,140.7330,33.00,3.90,Mb,6,,,0.99,NEI,2000100440
2000/11/26 07:30:57.31,36.5720,140.4890,100.70,4.10,Mb,20,,,1.00,NEI,2000112640
2003/04/21 01:18:34.48,36.5260,140.7190,70.20,4.60,Mb,86,,,0.94,NEI,2003042140
2003/05/11 07:29:00.09,36.4780,140.7260,83.20,4.10,Mb,17,,,0.49,NEI,2003051140
2003/05/25 23:17:12.79,36.6090,140.6700,99.50,3.90,Mb,25,,,1.29,NEI,2003052540
2003/08/04 11:57:15.40,36.4720,140.4820,71.90,4.70,Mb,120,,,0.89,NEI,2003080440
2004/01/26 17:43:25.55,36.4530,140.5950,68.00,3.90,Mb,15,,,0.33,NEI,2004012640
2004/05/16 10:53:45.40,36.8170,140.3410,99.90,3.70,Mb,18,,,1.01,NEI,2004051640
2004/10/25 18:32:07.37,36.8370,140.5740,10.00,4.40,Mb,7,,,1.07,NEI,2004102540
2005/05/13 15:14:40.71,36.4820,140.4960,64.50,4.30,Mw,71,,,0.72,NEI,2005051340
2006/01/21 13:46:19.08,36.8680,140.3240,108.00,3.00,Unk,4,,,0.00,JMA,2006012140
2006/11/15 08:39:08.87,36.5230,140.5660,57.70,3.90,Unk,8,,,0.00,JMA,2006111540
2007/05/08 17:08:46.22,36.5230,140.6910,54.50,3.90,Unk,12,,,0.00,JMA,2007050840
2008/03/02 09:33:31.72,36.6140,140.4320,83.30,4.10,Mw,43,,,0.64,NEI,2008030240
2008/03/07 16:54:57.17,36.4530,140.6120,57.00,5.20,Mw,328,,,0.00,JMA,2008030740
2008/08/22 10:59:50.12,36.4630,140.4010,51.50,5.20,Mw,312,,,0.75,NEI,2008082240
2008/08/26 06:16:06.65,36.9820,140.4760,108.70,4.00,Mw,32,,,0.00,JMA,2008082640
2008/09/25 01:36:44.15,36.4560,140.5950,55.40,4.00,Mb,17,,,0.00,JMA,2008092540
2008/12/21 08:20:05.01,36.7760,140.6340,80.60,3.40,Unk,7,,,0.00,JMA,2008122140
2009/07/21 18:56:39.88,36.5700,140.5630,93.70,4.20,Mw,37,,,0.93,NEI,2009072140
2010/02/22 09:52:53.36,36.4860,140.5390,65.10,4.80,Mb,53,,,0.72,NEI,2010022220
2010/03/19 10:27:32.27,36.7360,140.3970,78.00,4.20,Mb,25,,,1.11,NEI,2010031920
2010/03/30 21:18:34.90,36.4630,140.6050,53.90,4.70,Mb,47,,,0.83,NEI,2010033020
2010/05/06 19:38:24.81,36.9010,140.6440,43.90,4.00,Mb,23,,,0.55,NEI,2010050620
2011/03/12 01:12:14.03,37.0740,140.5550,37.70,4.80,Mb,186,,,0.74,NEI,2011031210
2011/03/12 05:14:53.62,36.8180,140.3480,49.80,4.90,Mb,194,,,0.66,NEI,2011031210
2011/03/13 23:41:27.70,36.8240,140.7000,25.50,4.70,Mb,69,,,0.74,NEI,2011031311
2011/03/14 11:06:34.12,36.8730,140.5830,23.00,4.80,Mb,68,,,1.17,NEI,2011031410
2011/03/15 06:56:31.54,36.8640,140.3630,30.00,4.70,Mb,122,,,0.48,NEI,2011031510
2011/03/15 07:03:49.43,36.8030,140.3370,34.70,4.90,Mb,206,,,0.62,NEI,2011031510
2011/04/01 12:15:12.05,36.8040,140.6070,25.90,4.90,Mb,61,,,1.51,NEI,2011040110
2011/04/02 09:05:12.50,36.9740,140.4020,25.60,4.50,Mb,37,,,0.41,NEI,2011040210
2011/04/02 10:22:58.34,36.8190,140.4830,28.20,4.60,Mb,45,,,0.44,NEI,2011040210
2011/04/02 14:38:09.72,37.0970,140.7140,14.60,4.80,Mb,102,,,1.20,NEI,2011040210
2011/04/05 09:08:53.59,36.5900,140.4020,37.30,4.50,Mb,39,,,0.80,NEI,2011040510
2011/04/06 12:56:52.87,36.7570,140.3800,21.90,4.90,Mb,176,,,0.78,NEI,2011040610
2011/04/10 00:50:48.34,36.8140,140.5800,65.90,4.70,Mb,82,,,0.96,NEI,2011041000


Source: ANSS

edit on 11/4/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 11:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
That area became active in 1964


Yeah thanks for digging that up. So then this could be a new reactivation of a previously known fault? Or? What exactly are you saying...?

By the way, since II.ERM has come back online, most of these smaller ones are registering there too. They definitely seem to be quakes. And most are centered right around that same area of the "6.6". Man what a cluster****. So if this is true now we have aftershocks from a main shock that was an aftershock of a bigger main shock.

And I am really getting sick of trying to figure out what the magnitude is when you have ten different sources saying different things.


Solution: we invent and adopt the new ATS magnitude, Mats. We take all sources, average the magnitude, and that's what it becomes. The end.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 12:36 PM
link   
Maybe there is a new Volcano forming? Would explain those weird Quakes all roughly in the same Spot...Magma coming up...

Example:

edit on 11-4-2011 by Shenon because: spelling



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


I don't know if the lack of detail before 1963 is because there is none, or because there was no recording before that so I am not sure if this is simply a continuation of older business or not - probably is. It seems odd to have started up with a high 4 however.

This is right close by but I don't think there is anything significant about it, as is this one but a bit further away and is/was a shield volcano.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 



Solution: we invent and adopt the new ATS magnitude, Mats. We take all sources, average the magnitude, and that's what it becomes. The end.


MATS it is then, as long as we don't take that average of the USGS phase data. Way to many variants.

Is there a formula for converting to Mw otherwise my catalogues are all going to be out!!



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 91  92  93    95  96  97 >>

log in

join