Quake Watch 2011, page 80


Pages: <<  77    78    79    80    81    82    83  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 203 times


reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 09:23 AM by Aggie Man
reply to post by BeyondPerception


USGS is now showing two 7.0 quakes in that region. The second one has a depth of 10 km; however, it has not been reviewed yet.

Just as I posted this, USGS removed the 7.0 at 229.4 km.

edit on 24-3-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 09:49 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by inthemistandfog


You are correct it was a shindo 5. My bad memory!

This was the post with the magnitude details.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

EMSC now have it as a 5.0 but USGS are still 4.9. The green is EMSC.



The USGS description leaves much to be desired. It says near the coast of Honshu, yet for ones in the sea it says off the coast. Not much distinction really.
edit on 24/3/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 09:58 AM by boo1981
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 6.8
Date-Time Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 13:55:12 UTC
Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 08:25:12 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 20.705°N, 99.949°E
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles)
Region MYANMAR
Distances 89 km (55 miles) N of Chiang Rai, Thailand
168 km (104 miles) SSW of Yunjinghong, Yunnan, China
589 km (365 miles) NE of Rangoon, Myanmar
772 km (479 miles) N of BANGKOK, Thailand

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 15.4 km (9.6 miles); depth +/- 5.8 km (3.6 miles)
Parameters NST=109, Nph=109, Dmin=234.9 km, Rmss=0.88 sec, Gp= 36°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=C
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID usc0002aes



And another
This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 4.8
Date-Time Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 14:23:53 UTC
Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 08:53:53 PM at epicenter

Location 20.595°N, 99.862°E
Depth 10.2 km (6.3 miles)
Region MYANMAR
Distances 77 km (48 miles) N (2°) from Chiang Rai, Thailand
183 km (114 miles) SSW (213°) from Yunjinghong, Yunnan, China
220 km (137 miles) NNE (25°) from Chiang Mai, Thailand
411 km (255 miles) NW (315°) from VIENTIANE, Laos

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 20.4 km (12.7 miles); depth +/- 4.4 km (2.7 miles)
Parameters NST= 25, Nph= 25, Dmin=219.3 km, Rmss=0.82 sec, Gp=104°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

Event ID usc0002afa



earthquake.usgs.gov...
edit on 24/3/11 by boo1981 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 10:04 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by boo1981


I still don't see that one in my database and later stuff has already come in. I am wondering if like the 7.0 earlier there it has been deleted?

The 4.8 has just come in.


reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 10:16 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by tncryptogal


So would I be right in saying that it is a nice day, reasonably warm?

That sounds just what glider pilots call a 'cloud street'. Basically many rows of cumulus clouds forming, that will get larger and tend to join up as the day goes on. It is called a street because there is good lift under those and you can glide 'down the street' and even go street hopping.

Earthquakes clouds are yet to be proven to exist as far as I am aware.

However, these claims have very little support in the scientific community.


Source
edit on 24/3/2011 by PuterMan because: posted edit in the wrong post!



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 10:20 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by 5senses


This is because RSOE and the BBC are idiots and neither check their facts.

There was 1 earthquake, registered as a 6.7 by EMSC and a 6.8 by USGS. There was a 7.0 but it was deleted and replaced with the 6.8. Edit: Actually I tell a lie. Looking at my revisions the 6.8 was posted as well as the deleted 7.0, and was first posted as a 7.0 and then revised to 6.8 - See below. So for at least a few minutes there were 2 but no one in Auntie thought to check. Typically of course RSOE has not updated the magnitude and probably never will yet says it's source is USGS-RSOE. They don't source anything! They work from the same list that I do.

Deleted version
Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-03-24T13:55:36.000Z,20.89800,99.88300,7.0000,229.4000,Myanmar


Replacement Version
Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-03-24T13:55:12.000Z,20.70490,99.94900,6.8000,10.0000,Myanmar




I see RSOE have changed it to one. That makes a pleasant change!! Perhaps they are learning.
edit on 24/3/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


Revisions records
c0002aes us C 2011-03-24T13:55:12.000Z 20.70490 99.94900 6.8000 Mw 109 10.0000
c0002aes us C 2011-03-24T13:55:12.000Z 20.70470 99.94890 7.0000 Mw 109 10.0000
c0002aes us 2 2011-03-24T13:55:12.000Z 20.70490 99.94900 6.8000 Mw 109 10.0000


Same sources as above.
edit on 24/3/2011 by PuterMan because: Playing with images



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 10:48 AM by 5senses
reply to post by PuterMan


Ok. Thanks for clarifying.
Guess RSOE is the lesser of evils to go by then...?



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 11:06 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by 5senses


Personally I would not use Auntie or RSOE for anything (they are Radio Hams after all)

They have their uses as a source of other events perhaps but for earthquakes I would be using EMSC and/or USGS depending really on the areas you are interested in.

For Europe obviously EMSC is better. For the UK you could take the occasional peek at BGS.

All of these are found in the links in my signature.


reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 12:29 PM by 5senses
reply to post by PuterMan


Great - I'll check out the sites and add them to my faves.


reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 12:38 PM by muzzy
reply to post by PuterMan

Thanks, I have that Makran quake on the 1945 7+Project page/map/list as an 8.3 Unk Mag, data from NOAA, I still haven't revised the pages from 1948's back with the Centennial List yet, so haven't got any other sources or magntudes for it.
Always handy to get some extra descriptions as well, thats the hardest part, finding descriptions.
I should put the source of the descriptions on too I guess, has only come to light when posting off the Project to ATS, I've forgotten where I got 90% of the texts now


reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 05:13 PM by OptimisticPessimist
Two 3.7M Northern California in the space of 30min?

Is this something to be wary of?
Apologies for my lack of knowledge on this matter.

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...
edit on 24-3-2011 by OptimisticPessimist because: (no reason given)


Edit to add: Not to worry - found a thread who's discussion has helped calm my unusually nervous feeling tonight (else I would have thought twice about posting something that is obviously being watched by those on this thread and would've likely been mentioned before I posted I'm sure!).
edit on 24-3-2011 by OptimisticPessimist because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-3-2011 @ 05:44 PM by Anmarie96
reply to post by OptimisticPessimist


This is what I come up with

3.2 2011/03/24 14:45:23 40.027N 120.071W 2.7 26 km (16 mi) NNE of Chilcoot-Vinton, CA
3.5 2011/03/24 14:20:40 40.039N 120.062W 6.0 27 km (17 mi) NNE of Chilcoot-Vinton, CA


Sourcey poo
edit on 24-3-2011 by Anmarie96 because: fix the freakin linky

Pages: <<  77    78    79    80    81    82    83  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags