It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Quake Watch 2011

page: 42
<< 39  40  41    43  44  45 >>

log in


posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 08:06 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

This one only 5km deep. Yes you're right, no casualties last one.

Ps where are your links
Pss. Fracking link on QVPS has no info
edit on 23-2-2011 by zenius because: oops

posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 11:16 PM
reply to post by muzzy


Noticed you are in New Zealand.

We wish you the very best and hope that you and yours are OK:

Is there ANYTHING I/we here at ATS could accomplish collectively to help in any way there?

My background is 20+ years Red Cross logistics and volunteer firefighter/first response.

I'm pretty conversant on the computer, also.

I look forward to your response.

In Peace & Light

DOMINO EFFECT OF FEBRUARY 2011 - I Had a Dream About America's Future

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:37 AM

Originally posted by zenius
It's all gone eerily quiet now.......
Thought there would be more aftershocks recorded on USGS in the NZ region today.

Most of them are low 4 ML, so they won't be showing them.
For the 23rd UTC I've got 6 @ 4.017 to 4.366 and 42 @ 3.07 to 3.902 and 18 @ 2.615 to 2.965all in ML, just plotting them now.
I'm not sure if I will do the Felt reports for this series of aftershocks, most of the ones Geonet are showing as felt only have a few reports from outer areas, the power still out to 50% of Christchurch and people still in survival mode getting water and sorting out where to go next, no time for posting on the Net

I'd take it that all the 4's were felt and probably 80% of the 3's.

Looks like a standard 6 aftershock quake series, tapering off quite quickly down to the 2's
edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:48 AM
reply to post by thorfourwinds

I'm not sure thor4winds, the Red Cross here are saying that they don't want blankets, tents and cans of food etc because the task of managing such influx of materials will distract staff from the task at hand, helping people cope with the trauma.
If anyone feels the need to help they are asking for cash towards the Red Cross Appeal
• Secure online donation at
• Cheque to: New Zealand Red Cross 2011 Earthquake Appeal, Freepost 232690, PO Box 12140, Thorndon, Wellington 6144
• Direct Credit Transfer to our Special Appeal Bank Account: Kiwibank 38-9009-0759479-00 and the account name is RED CROSS.
• Direct Credit Transfer to our Special Appeals Bank Account: ASB 12-3192-0015998-02

I got that info from this page, Scoop
Theres quite a bit of info on that page

On a personal level, maybe contact the Red Cross NZ directly and see if they can use your experience.
edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 02:18 AM
chch quake crowe

Check out the 'circles' link,

I live pretty much "bang in there."
The percussion sound is very clear,and then some rumblers.
Hear them just before they hit (c.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 01:01 PM
Of all the quake happenings this worries me most
MAP 5.1 2011/02/24 04:36:53 -36.082 -73.289 23.9 OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE

Bio-Bio when it rattles there,,, not good.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 05:34 PM
Listening to RadioNZ whilst driving around this morning they had the 20 year veteran head of the British Rsecue Team (65 crew) on, he said "this is the best organised disaster he has ever been to"

edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 07:09 PM
Magnitude 3.6 - OAHU REGION, HAWAII
2011 February 25 00:12:38 UTC

3.6 (Preliminary magnitude — update expected within 15 minutes)
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 00:12:38 UTC
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 02:12:38 PM at epicenter
21.330°N, 157.740°W
4 km (2.5 miles) set by location program
3 km (2 miles) SW (214°) from Waimanalo, HI
4 km (3 miles) W (265°) from Waimanalo Beach, HI
6 km (4 miles) SSE (158°) from Maunawili, HI
9 km (6 miles) ENE (75°) from Honolulu, HI
Location Uncertainty
Error estimate not available
NST= 26, Nph=0, Dmin=0 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp= 0,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=A
NOAA Pacific Tsunami Warning Center
Event ID

Not on the big island, for a change.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 07:13 PM
reply to post by berkeleygal son lives on Oahu.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 08:08 PM
Just in case the JAFA's are feeling left out of all this

LAT/LONG: -36.78695, 175.19044
UTC: 2011/2/23 11:54:15
NZDT: 2011/2/24 0:54:15
DEPTH: 9km
MAG: 1.968ML
LOCATION: o/s N of Pakatoa Island, Hauraki Gulf, Auckland
Reported as Felt: No

edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 08:11 PM
reply to post by muzzy

Was just reading the New Zealand News - also very informative and organized. I can see things coming together for the city and the people. Good work there everyone!

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 08:16 PM
Hi, I am new on here and have been watching and reading through various threads and well I live in the beautiful state of Oregon and have heard about a lot of strange rainbows in the clouds and saw a few pics and vids of this especially the one in china right before the major quake that happened there. I heard and read there is some speculation that those strange rainbows might be ominous of an impending quake well whether true or not I figured on one of these quake threads I might as well say what I just saw and I know we have an unusual weather system going through the pacific NW at the current time and that the HAARP may or may not be responsible for a lot of our very odd weather on this planet and major quakes showing up(I personally think so and also think(my opinion) that there are many other factors as well and not just HAARP alone.) but I just saw and tried to get a few pics but my camera just wouldn't work for me they came out to blurry even though you can faintly see it but if I can post them I will blurry or not and I know what rainbows look like and all I can say it was no normal rainbow. Does anyone know if these "rainbows" mean anything even if not quake related?

I really love this sight, it seems this is a good place for real news and not just pork but stuff that really matters thanks ppl for all the info you put out here if not for this site fox news might not have been exposed to the dangers of fracking which had no clue and only thought the word frack was a BSG slang word
among other things, I just hope they have not caused severe damage before something catastrophic happens and many people lose there lives in Arkansas or any fracking place these mother frackers frack at chasing there unanswerd quest for billions....I hope I stayed on topic enough considering this is a quake thread but I like to rant and rave but thanks.....

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:13 PM
reply to post by BobAthome

Thanks for the heads up, I forgot I was supposed to be tracking Chile as well, got absorbed in the ChCh quake, fell behind 6 days on Chile

USGS cover the country pretty well, and GUC pick up the dribs and drabs.

GUC gave that one a 4.8ML

While on Chile, I looked back to the 21st and no one posted the quake in Aisen that I could see.
A significant event as there hasn't been a quake in Southern Chile for quite a while.

DATE/TIME UTC: 21/02/2011 05:38:15
LOCAL TIME : 2011-02-21 02:38:15
LAT/LONG: -45.733, -72.321
DEPTH: 35.2km
MAG: 5.4mb
LOCATION: 26 km al SO de Coyhaique

edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: whats with this ribbon BS along the bottom of each page? its REALLY annoying having to hide it all the time to see what is on the main forum page

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:22 PM
reply to post by yahfearing

Yes I have definitely heard about the rainbows before quakes. I don't know how reliable it is as far as predicting quakes but they have shown up before. Thank you for letting us know - something to keep in mind. Are you on the coast in Oregon or inland? I lived on the coast for 10 years in the 1990's. Beautiful!

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:22 PM

edit on 24-2-2011 by crazydaisy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:18 PM
reply to post by crazydaisy

I was born on the coast reedsport but my mom moved us to Roseburg in the late 85 when I was a baby which with everything going on I hope I am far enough inland if major tsunamis happen right now I am about 70 miles from the coast at 500ft. From what I have read about various other topics that may or may not be safe I know I've hear at least 100mi and 500ft in elevation from the coast. Yes I would agree Oregon is a beautiful state with the best views of how great this planet we live on is but so are many other states and countries

My gut feeling tells me something BIG is coming soon with these sudden painful migraines, lightheadedness, upset stomach feeling and my son has been super clingy lately the past few weeks when my migraines started. Anyone else feeling those feelings lately? I know I've read of quite a few people feeling that way too and was glad I was not the only one.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:30 PM

Originally posted by Anmarie96
Good Morning Muzzy

Magnitude 5.3
Date-Time Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 15:02:46 UTC
Friday, January 28, 2011 at 03:02:46 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 38.424°S, 176.001°E
Depth 153.9 km (95.6 miles)
Distances 35 km (25 miles) SW of Rotorua, New Zealand
140 km (90 miles) NW of Napier, New Zealand
205 km (125 miles) SSE of Auckland, New Zealand
335 km (210 miles) NNE of WELLINGTON, New Zealand
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 13.9 km (8.6 miles); depth +/- 3.2 km (2.0 miles)
Parameters NST= 58, Nph= 59, Dmin=93.5 km, Rmss=0.93 sec, Gp= 50°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=5

follow up to post by muzzy

I was just refreshing my Mag 5+ blog and downloaded the entire years data so far to get the numbers.

This quake has been revised UP to 6.351 ML
edit on 24-2-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:37 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

Thanks for your kind reply.

Will check the link.

I don't require nth degree scientific proof. Your judgment on this score would suffice.

If 100% were 100% certainty . . . where would your personal opinion be at this point in your research . . . as to whether or not quakes are being deliberately deleted from the public record?

Thanks tons for your kind reply.

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:11 PM
Lots of new stuff on Geonet site about the Lyttelton quake

they've even drawn a Fault Line on this map

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:13 PM
reply to post by muzzy

Why are they calling the most recent quake an aftershock?

top topics

<< 39  40  41    43  44  45 >>

log in