Quake Watch 2011

reply to post by PuterMan


in fact there is...

and there was still 1

6.8-magnitude earthquake strikes off coast of Chile

we are just...faster


i guess 4 quakes in the same spot over MAG 5 deserve little news right???

there top stories are..

Police: Dad admitted killing twin girls
Chinese activist 'beaten, imprisoned'
Lebanon bank denies laundering charge
Assange to hear extradition fate Feb. 24
Colombian rebels to release 2 hostages
Fraud claim for 'killer' diet drug
New Pakistani Cabinet sworn-in
Construction of 1,000 mph car begins
Nokia, Microsoft join forces on phones
Squirrels seized in huge smuggling haul

what do you think put?

reply to post by heineken


We are often faster!

We are also often more accurate!

i guess 4 quakes in the same spot over MAG 5 deserve little news right???

In some places yes, in Chile or the Moro Gulf not really.

I think in defence of usgs (I'm one otheir biggest critics) there have been a lot of double and triple wammy quakes lately (since the Samoa 8.0) and it must be hard to figure out what is going on in the initial stages of data processing.
just look at the Celebes Sea one (two) the other day.

so a 6.8 and a 6.2 = energy wise
compared to a 7 ?

reply to post by muzzy


6.8+6.2=1125.892541
7=1995.262315

These are all GJ

Japan next??

makes me think..2 more in Bonin Islands..

DATE LAT LON MAG DEPTH km REGION
12-FEB-2011 00:05:39 27.35 143.09 4.9 10.0 BONIN ISLANDS REGION
11-FEB-2011 23:59:17 27.27 143.08 5.1 12.9 BONIN ISLANDS REGION


quiet close to Japan and the 5.4 they had on the 10th might just be indicating that plate is been active quiet a bit

Originally posted by heineken
Japan next??

makes me think..2 more in Bonin Islands..

DATE LAT LON MAG DEPTH km REGION
12-FEB-2011 00:05:39 27.35 143.09 4.9 10.0 BONIN ISLANDS REGION
11-FEB-2011 23:59:17 27.27 143.08 5.1 12.9 BONIN ISLANDS REGION


quiet close to Japan and the 5.4 they had on the 10th might just be indicating that plate is been active quiet a bit

this is was i meant..area activity since Feb 9th

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4547887473cf.jpg[/atsimg]

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-02-12T01:17:01.000Z,-37.03000,-73.17000,5.4000,2.0000,OFFSHORE BIO
2011-02-12T01:17:02.000Z,-36.98930,-73.08500,6.1000,8.3000,Bio-Bio. Chile

Still a big discrepancy USGS 6.3 > 6.1 and EMSC 5.5 > 5.4

Could this be two quakes? I don't think it is but I am surprised they are not closer in mags.

reply to post by PuterMan


Thanks for the energy calculation

re the 01:17:01 quake

you know what I think, I think they are getting them all mixed up

they are as confused as we are

Check out what the Chileans have on their page, those 6's had a bit of a buildup this morning
www.sismologia.cl...
Fecha-Hora Local, Latitud, Longitud, Profundidad, Mag Type, Agency, Sensible (2), Location
2011/02/11 23:20:51, -36.669, -73.352, 7, 3 ML, GUC, No, 33 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 23:04:49, -36.441, -73.228, 7.9, 3.6 ML, GUC, No, 46 km al N de Concepción
2011/02/11 23:03:42, -36.644, -73.278, 14.4, 3.3 ML, GUC, No, 29 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 22:47:07, -37.311, -73.718, 17.8, 4.5 ML, GUC, Si, 34 km al N de Lebu
2011/02/11 22:37:37, -37.318, -74.162, 33, 4.4 ML, GUC, Si, 56 km al NO de Lebu
2011/02/11 22:33:39, -37.049, -74.095, 21.8, 4.2 ML, GUC, Si, 72 km al O de Arauco
2011/02/11 22:28:12, -37.114, -73.907, 20.1, 3.3 ML, GUC, Si, 54 km al O de Arauco
2011/02/11 22:22:29, -37.253, -73.8, 9.7, 4.1 ML, GUC, Si, 42 km al N de Lebu
2011/02/11 22:16:50, -37.322, -74.697, 19.2, 6 ML, GUC, Si, 97 km al O de Lebu
2011/02/11 22:16:50, -37.322, -74.697, 9.2, 6 ML, GUC, No, 97 km al O de Lebu
2011/02/11 21:43:53, -36.613, -73.359, 7.1, 4 ML, GUC, Si, 36 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 21:33:36, -36.478, -73.006, 38.9, 3.4 ML, GUC, Si, 40 km al N de Concepción
2011/02/11 21:24:18, -36.328, -73.509, 28, 3.2 ML, GUC, No, 67 km al O de Cobquecura
2011/02/11 20:58:04, -36.607, -73.376, 7, 4.1 ML, GUC, Si, 38 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 20:57:13, -36.585, -73.329, 7.1, 4.2 ML, GUC, No, 37 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 20:52:04, -36.602, -73.453, 5.7, 3.9 ML, GUC, Si, 44 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 20:39:16, -37.123, -74.253, 37.7, 5.3 ML, GUC, Si, 76 km al NO de Lebu
2011/02/11 20:09:02, -36.53, -73.434, 10, 3.7 ML, GUC, Si, 47 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 19:50:36, -36.553, -73.369, 7, 3.9 ML, GUC, Si, 41 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 19:20:40, -31.62, -71.279, 31.4, 4 ML, GUC, Si, 10 km al O de Illapel
2011/02/11 19:19:05, -36.503, -73.221, 7, 3.6 ML, GUC, Si, 39 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 19:12:41, -36.67, -73.507, 11.1, 4.5 ML, GUC, Si, 44 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 18:54:26, -36.647, -73.326, 19, 3.9 ML, GUC, No, 32 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 18:45:57, -36.657, -73.442, 17.7, 4.9 ML, GUC, Si, 40 km al NO de Concepción
2011/02/11 18:37:30, -36.657, -73.512, 5, 4.2 ML, GUC, Si, 46 km al NO de Concepción

4.6 atYellowstone!!!

also another 6.1 in Chile..

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3a1661b653f9.jpg[/atsimg]

Nothing on USGS about a 4.6 in Yellowstone.. Hmmm...

I am worried though.. I'm noticing a lot of pressure building, and loads of small quakes--and in the past 12 hours, a bunch in the New Madrid fault.. (tiny though)... and one in Alabama.

This pressure extends from Chile all the way to Washington State, into Yellowstone, and down the rocky mountains... Everything I see is screaming 'something bad is coming in days'. Now 'bad' could simply mean a 4.0+ on the new Madrid... or a 6+ somewhere on US soil...

Sure hope not. Just have an odd feeling.

Things happening in Iceland

See this post

www.abovetopsecret.com...

and the one below it.

reply to post by PuterMan


check out Mila cams

lots of melting going on, I have been keeping an eye out.

eldgos.mila.is...

reply to post by heineken


That was already posted (the 6.1) AND THE 4.6 AT Yellowstone was a non-event.

I would appreciate it if you would check first and calm down a little.

reply to post by berkeleygal


Are you looking at the jokulsarlon cam?

Big lumps of Ice(land ) but I suppose it is getting warmer so perhaps to be expected.

reply to post by Pharyax


Collective mania! The lemmings are getting ready to head for the cliffs.

Good. Might leave more space for the rest of us and make life more peaceful!

This panicking is doing my head in.

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by heineken

 

That was already posted (the 6.1) AND THE 4.6 AT Yellowstone was a non-event.

I would appreciate it if you would check first and calm down a little.

why are you telling me to calm down a little??...i am very calm thank you

the iris last 30 still showing the yellowstone event...maybe they NEED your help

www.iris.edu...

12-FEB-2011 02:36:09 44.27 -110.97 4.6 15.5 YELLOWSTONE REGION, WYOMING


Seismic Monitor is updated every 20 minutes (jumbo-sized map hourly).

Left unattended your browser will automatically reload the page at about the same interval.

Earthquake data are provided by the USGS National Earthquake Information Center .

reply to post by heineken


I was asking you to calm down because we don't need the exclamation marks and frankly your very large maps are a bit in one's face. They could do with being toned down a bit. Just my opinion of course.

When you understand how the system works a little better you will realise that you cannot post everything you see without checking, and that sometimes these errors take a little time to work their way out of the system. This is especially true of quakes at Yellowstone in the wintertime.

You have to check the information in the listings against an appropriate seismo. You can read the explanation by the YVO of why this happens on the Yellowstone thread by the way.

reply to post by PuterMan


yes, that one especially

3 days ago it was covered in ice, last night it was open water, now more little iceies

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by heineken

 

I was asking you to calm down because we don't need the exclamation marks and frankly your very large maps are a bit in one's face. They could do with being toned down a bit. Just my opinion of course.

When you understand how the system works a little better you will realise that you cannot post everything you see without checking, and that sometimes these errors take a little time to work their way out of the system. This is especially true of quakes at Yellowstone in the wintertime.

You have to check the information in the listings against an appropriate seismo. You can read the explanation by the YVO of why this happens on the Yellowstone thread by the way.

edit on 12/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)

after being to your website i think you need lesson how to tone things a little bit dont you think m8?



if you want i can offer you some Macromedia Flash lessons, you will spice up your life in minutes ^^

Peace

reply to post by berkeleygal


and...
3 days ago Eyja was covered from head to river in white... as I said, lots of melting going on