It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 268
203
<< 265  266  267    269  270  271 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 01:16 AM
link   
reply to post by MoorfNZ
 


I was kind of wondering the same thing.

It's the lack of activity that set's one to take notice. We live on an active planet, there is a lot of energy beneath our feet and even more pouring in from sol, not to mention the thin breeze of cosmic wind that makes it though the heliopause. It all adjusts the total, which is neither created nor destroyed but rather transforms and goes on to do some other seemingly innocuous universal task.

Tell me we still have >4.5's happening outside the US...

I don't have many good international seismic links.




posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by jadedANDcynical
reply to post by MoorfNZ
 


I was kind of wondering the same thing.

It's the lack of activity that set's one to take notice. We live on an active planet, there is a lot of energy beneath our feet and even more pouring in from sol, not to mention the thin breeze of cosmic wind that makes it though the heliopause. It all adjusts the total, which is neither created nor destroyed but rather transforms and goes on to do some other seemingly innocuous universal task.

Tell me we still have >4.5's happening outside the US...

I don't have many good international seismic links.


Yep, I always get more nervous when there are few earthquakes


Nothing nearing 4.5 on radar here in New Zealand and the European lists (EMSC) showing nothing of much consequence, too.....

*tick tick tick tick*



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 03:35 AM
link   
Well looks like i was wrong about activity picking up on the quake cam here in Los Angeles.

abclocal.go.com...

Its been kind of quiet......too quiet if you ask me.



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 03:48 AM
link   
reply to post by jadedANDcynical
 


All looks pretty normal to me.


The graphs, which I can't post are showing a steady set of magnitudes over the past 7 days and the cumulative mag 4.5 plus is also steady. Actually in terms of numbers they average around 55 quakes a day but the quietest day was the 11th but i don't think anyone noticed that.

Instead of a graph here are some figures I just ran through the database based on USGS lists for Mag 5+ earthquakes over the last 7 days. This is count of number and energy released in Gigajoules

Date, Num,GJoules
11th, 1, 63,096
12th, 5, 134,697
13th, 5, 32,354
14th, 5, 157,261
15th, 8, 5,834,895
16th, 8, 828,513
17th, 3, 56,593
18th, 1, 15,849


edit on 18/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


Pst - Want to see EMSC as a comparison? I won't charge you.

Date, Num,GJoules
11th, 1, 22,387
12th, 4, 97,096
13th, 5, 26,639
14th, 5, 132,318
15th, 8, 5,836,259
16th, 9, 849,856
17th, 4, 29,768
18th, 1, 31,622

So you know me, I have to play with number and graphs. It is 'a condition' I think.


I just had to put all of 2011 for mag 6 and mag 5 into the stored procedure I just created. Since I can't display the results here see the charts here where you can also download the XLSX file of the data and have a play for your self if you are sad like me and have nothing better to do on a Sunday.
edit on 18/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 05:52 AM
link   
Don't cry and don't be so sad.
The sunspots has been low past two days; IF latest theory is correct then Prediction?

Expect jump in quake numbers from 19 Sept - because current low magnetic flux from Daddy Sol.



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan


.....if you are sad like me and have nothing better to do on a Sunday.


Hi Puterman. Here's something to occupy yourself with!

Seems pretty intense activity? or just normal for Iceland?

Regards



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   
... BOOM


6.8 INDIA

earthquake.usgs.gov...


69 km (43 miles) NW (310°) from Gangtok, Sikkim, India
120 km (74 miles) NNW (343°) from Shiliguri, West Bengal, India
133 km (83 miles) E (94°) from Namche Bazar, Nepal
166 km (103 miles) W (278°) from THIMPHU, Bhutan



Magnitude 6.8 Date-Time Sunday, September 18, 2011 at 12:40:48 UTC Sunday, September 18, 2011 at 06:10:48 PM at epicenter Location 27.730°N, 88.082°E Depth 20.7 km (12.9 miles) Region SIKKIM, INDIA

edit on 18-9-2011 by MoorfNZ because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-9-2011 by MoorfNZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by MoorfNZ
 


I can't find any news reports as of yet....I am sure they are still collecting information for this Quake. The only thing I read was electricity was out.

Wishing these people all good news!



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by logicalview
 


Actually for that particular area of iceland that is not out of the ordinary. It is a very active area, and guess what - they extract steam for hydro power there.

I have been occupying my time making charts. I would like an opinion on the vertical format of this one as full year graphs horizontally are difficult on web pages.

2010 Mag 5+ Earthquakes Vertical Stacked Bar Chart



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:48 AM
link   
reply to post by MamaJ
 


Fortunately it is relative rural with only 40k people exposed to MMI IV

earthquake.usgs.gov...

I think you can say that regrettably there will be casualties.

Asia Pacific News

There were no immediate reports of any casualties or damage.


CNN


No tsunami warning was issued


Really CNN for an earthquake near Kathmandu? You don't say!


edit on 18/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:54 AM
link   
Not receiving updates on the India quake
is not good news. That to me indicates
the situation is bad.



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by crazydaisy
Not receiving updates on the India quake
is not good news. That to me indicates
the situation is bad.


Not necessarily. It is a very remote area.

Another news source

ATS Thread on it here

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 18/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 09:06 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 






Really CNN for an earthquake near Kathmandu? You don't say!



thats what i thought,
but PTWC did issue a "message"...

see: ptwc.weather.gov...


seeya



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 09:25 AM
link   
reply to post by shaneR
 


don't worry...they issued the report to say NO Tsunami will be generated

A DESTRUCTIVE TSUNAMI WAS NOT GENERATED BASED ON EARTHQUAKE AND


HISTORICAL TSUNAMI DATA. THIS EARTHQUAKE IS LOCATED TOO FAR


INLAND TO GENERATE A TSUNAMI IN THE INDIAN OCEAN.


The caps are theirs, not mine

link ptwc.weather.gov...



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 10:39 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


gday PuterMan, and thanks...

i know it said no tsunami, i just wondered why they issued it in the first place...


plus, i didnt see this listed here... 4.1, queensland australia...

not big, i know, but not far from me...

and E/Q's not all that common around there...

usgs...


earthquake.usgs.gov...


seeya



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by shaneR
 


I missed that one, even when scrolling through GeoAu this morning


Not far from the one earlier in the year eh

bit of a surprise


heres a siesmo trace from ............................ drum roll plz ........................ Mt. Surprise, Qld



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


This site is for use by Geoscience Australia staff only.
Everyone else should go to Geoscience Australia Home Page

What are you not telling us muzzy?



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Now this is strange. The bird we have here in a cage freaked out squawking for 15 minutes and the birds outside all started carrieng on as well. I was outside and decided better check the stuff out.
When I checked the Earthquake info there seems to have been one many many miles away. Like


Type: Earthquake
17 minutes ago
Magnitude: 3.8
DateTime: Sunday September 18 2011, 19:19:12 UTC
Region: Ontario-Quebec border region, Canada
Depth: 5 km



from this site
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

now all is normal here again just an occasional bird singing. Was very freaky and rather annoying.



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Connman
Now this is strange. The bird we have here in a cage freaked out squawking for 15 minutes and the birds outside all started carrieng on as well. I was outside and decided better check the stuff out.
When I checked the Earthquake info there seems to have been one many many miles away. Like


Type: Earthquake
17 minutes ago
Magnitude: 3.8
DateTime: Sunday September 18 2011, 19:19:12 UTC
Region: Ontario-Quebec border region, Canada
Depth: 5 km



from this site
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

now all is normal here again just an occasional bird singing. Was very freaky and rather annoying.



that one has been changed to a 4.0


This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 4.0
Date-Time

Sunday, September 18, 2011 at 19:19:14 UTC
Sunday, September 18, 2011 at 03:19:14 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 45.601°N, 75.234°W
Depth 5 km (3.1 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region ONTARIO-QUEBEC BORDER REGION, CANADA
Distances

17 km (11 miles) ENE (58°) from Cumberland, Ontario, Canada
35 km (22 miles) ENE (69°) from Gatineau, Québec, Canada
40 km (25 miles) NE (54°) from Gloucester, Ontario, Canada
41 km (26 miles) ENE (61°) from OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 31.6 km (19.6 miles)
Parameters Nph= 32, Dmin=102 km, Rmss=0.22 sec, Gp=223°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=2
Source

Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network (LCSN)

Event ID ld60026001


earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 04:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by muzzy
 


This site is for use by Geoscience Australia staff only.
Everyone else should go to Geoscience Australia Home Page

What are you not telling us muzzy?


WhatWhichWhere?
You mean you caan't see the trace page?
I opened view image and copied the image address.
its on the link of the event page off the main page list anyway.
You can see the main page?
edit on 18-9-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 265  266  267    269  270  271 >>

log in

join