It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 26
203
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Magnitude
6.2
Date-Time
Monday, February 07, 2011 at 19:53:42 UTC
Tuesday, February 08, 2011 at 06:53:42 AM at epicenter
Location
7.157°S, 155.284°E
Depth
413.9 km (257.2 miles)
Region
SOLOMON ISLANDS
Distances
109 km (68 miles) SSW (196°) from Arawa, Bougainville, PNG
159 km (98 miles) WSW (250°) from Chirovanga, Solomon Islands
202 km (126 miles) WNW (301°) from Gizo, Solomon Islands
574 km (357 miles) WNW (296°) from HONIARA, Solomon Islands
915 km (569 miles) E (93°) from Lae, New Guinea, PNG
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 14.5 km (9.0 miles); depth +/- 5.3 km (3.3 miles)
Parameters
NST=116, Nph=116, Dmin=476.4 km, Rmss=0.99 sec, Gp= 32°,
M-type="moment" magnitude from initial P wave (tsuboi method) (Mi/Mwp), Version=8
Source
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver
Event ID
usb0001a1z


and it looks like they just got up in Alaska and added a bunch of new quakes and downgraded some. That Alaska map was completely yellow yesterday and this morning.




posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
If you need to knock down an "OMG the numbers are increasing" post then in addition to my earthquake analysis that is in my signature I have sort of replicated a reply to a post on ATS. You are welcome to use it as ammunition.

Do earthquake numbers matter?

edit on 7/2/2011 by PuterMan because: Changed the text of the link.



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 04:13 PM
link   
Regarding Cedar flats seismo at St Helens, The wind there now must be gale force as the seismos are going wild today. June Lake is about the same as 12 hours ago, and the Crater seismo is picking up. Snow storm perhaps....Westcoast??



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by zenius
 


Does not look like it from Seattle.

Time and Date.com

edit on 7/2/2011 by PuterMan because: No bracket and Hinge, or Hinge and Bracket. That will be lost on the Americans I guess and probably the Aussies as well!






edit on 7/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 04:49 PM
link   
It was windy up here last night (I'm 30 miles south of Seattle). Not sure how far back the readings go date wise. As of right now it's not real windy..



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by zenius
 


Ha! Finally found Mt St Helens weather forcast. Blustery with gale force gusts, north westerlies. source



posted on Feb, 7 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by zenius
 


Nice one.

Well done. That is definitely a keeper.



posted on Feb, 8 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Well, I don't live on Mount Saint Helens...but I can tell you right now in Skagit County, about 100 miles to the North it is sunny out with mostly blue skies. I am about to go for a walk because I HAVE to get out and get my exercise in while I can.


I was just hoping over here to post about the 5.2 quake that just occured off the shore of Oregon. I have been talking about Oregons off-shore quake, the 3.2 in the San Juans this morning and the very small, multiple quake activity in this region this recently.

While I can't say if that is wind....I can say that it certainly woulnd't surprise me to see the siesmos getting a bit wacked right now!


Magnitude 5.2
Date-Time Tuesday, February 08, 2011 at 22:02:01 UTC
Tuesday, February 08, 2011 at 02:02:01 PM at epicenter

Location 43.405°N, 127.119°W
Depth 10.1 km (6.3 miles)
Region OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
Distances 235 km (145 miles) W of Coos Bay, Oregon
275 km (170 miles) NW of Brookings, Oregon
280 km (175 miles) WSW of Newport, Oregon
370 km (230 miles) WSW of SALEM, Oregon

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 22.3 km (13.9 miles); depth +/- 0.8 km (0.5 miles)
Parameters NST= 88, Nph= 95, Dmin=234.9 km, Rmss=0.96 sec, Gp=241°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=7
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID usb0001atx



Just the past three days for my region:

MAP 5.2 2011/02/08 22:02:01 43.405 -127.119 10.1 222 km (138 mi) W of Bandon, OR
MAP 3.2 2011/02/08 16:36:36 48.562 -123.129 50.8 8 km ( 5 mi) WNW of Friday Harbor, WA
MAP 1.3 2011/02/08 13:40:20 47.499 -121.775 17.7 1 km ( 1 mi) NE of North Bend, WA
MAP 1.6 2011/02/08 13:23:44 47.375 -122.689 25.4 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of Gig Harbor, WA
MAP 1.3 2011/02/08 08:59:11 47.449 -122.252 27.1 3 km ( 2 mi) ENE of SeaTac, WA
MAP 4.7 2011/02/08 07:44:36 43.634 -127.744 10.2 275 km (171 mi) WNW of Bandon, OR
MAP 2.3 2011/02/08 01:19:39 46.153 -123.456 24.7 8 km ( 5 mi) SW of Cathlamet, WA
MAP 2.0 2011/02/07 23:56:37 48.419 -122.933 9.6 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of Friday Harbor, WA
MAP 1.2 2011/02/06 14:37:55 47.339 -122.279 41.4 1 km ( 0 mi) NNW of Lakeland North, WA
MAP 1.0 2011/02/06 02:26:16 47.334 -122.010 23.8 2 km ( 1 mi) NNE of Black Diamond, WA
MAP 1.1 2011/02/06 02:14:49 46.803 -121.936 10.7 8 km ( 5 mi) NE of Ashford, WA
MAP 1.2 2011/02/06 00:21:32 47.771 -122.439 20.9 5 km ( 3 mi) WSW of Woodway, WA


Source

Edit to add: I questioned earlier today on my other thread if the oregon quake last night and the san juan quake this morning might be fore-shocks. Hopefully this 5.2 will now release enough energy to quiet things down, rather than pull the trigger.

edit on 8-2-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-2-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2011 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Can some of you go to this thread and give your expert opinions on it? I would love to hear what you all think about this.
www.abovetopsecret.com...#
San Andreas a subduction fault capable of a 9.5+ EQ, USGS cover up?, is the title.



posted on Feb, 9 2011 @ 01:55 PM
link   
Magnitude mb 5.0
Region OWEN FRACTURE ZONE REGION
Date time 2011-02-09 19:24:15.0 UTC
Location 11.79 N ; 57.68 E
Depth 80 km
Distances 698 km SE Salalah (pop 163,140 ; local time 23:24:15.9 2011-02-09)
662 km SE Mirbat (pop 15,303 ; local time 23:24:15.9 2011-02-09)



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 05:56 AM
link   
Here's one out woop-woop

Magnitude 5.4
Date-Time

* Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 05:35:17 UTC
* Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 12:35:17 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 52.132°N, 91.779°E
Depth 14.5 km (9.0 miles)
Region SOUTHWESTERN SIBERIA, RUSSIA
Distances 180 km (110 miles) S of Abakan, Russia
190 km (120 miles) WNW of Kyzyl, Russia
240 km (150 miles) N of Ulaangom, Mongolia
3495 km (2170 miles) ENE of MOSCOW, Russia 1
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14 km (8.7 miles); depth +/- 0.2 km (0.1 miles)
Parameters NST=321, Nph=338, Dmin=509.8 km, Rmss=0.74 sec, Gp= 40°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=B
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usb0001bns



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 09:08 AM
link   
Wow, that's pretty deep:

Magnitude 6.5
Date-Time Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 14:39:28 UTC
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 10:39:28 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 4.126°N, 123.017°E
Depth 528.4 km (328.3 miles)
Region CELEBES SEA
Distances 310 km (190 miles) SE of Jolo, Sulu Archipelago, Philippines
325 km (200 miles) SW of General Santos, Mindanao, Philippines
1185 km (730 miles) S of MANILA, Philippines
2130 km (1320 miles) ENE of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   
Magnitude 5.4
Date-Time Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 13:03:03 UTC
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 10:03:03 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 37.168°N, 141.217°E
Depth 35.1 km (21.8 miles) set by location program
Region NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances 30 km (19 miles) ENE (68°) from Iwaki, Honshu, Japan
91 km (57 miles) SE (133°) from Fukushima, Honshu, Japan
111 km (69 miles) NE (36°) from Mito, Honshu, Japan
212 km (132 miles) NE (38°) from TOKYO, Japan

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 16.7 km (10.4 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=378, Nph=398, Dmin=467.5 km, Rmss=0.72 sec, Gp= 43°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=8
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID usb0001brh

earthquake.usgs.gov...
edit on 10/2/11 by boo1981 because: oops



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   
The world is moving heavily again today:

hisz.rsoe.hu...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

It feels like they get more and stonger...



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   
I would appreciate it if the local experts in this great thread would be so kind as to answer a question for me, or point me in the general direction to find this out. Does the depth of an EQ have an effect on the aftershocks? For example, would the 6.5 in the Philippines today be less prone to having an aftershock since it was 528.4 km deep?



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 04:12 PM
link   
The 6.5 was posted here but not this one

Magnitude
6.7
Date-Time
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 14:41:57 UTC
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 10:41:57 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
3.966°N, 123.125°E
Depth
512.2 km (318.3 miles)
Region
CELEBES SEA
Distances
330 km (205 miles) SW of General Santos, Mindanao, Philippines
330 km (205 miles) SE of Jolo, Sulu Archipelago, Philippines
1200 km (740 miles) SSE of MANILA, Philippines
2130 km (1320 miles) ENE of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 15.8 km (9.8 miles); depth +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles)
Parameters
NST=108, Nph=122, Dmin=800.4 km, Rmss=1.37 sec, Gp= 47°,
M-type="moment" magnitude from initial P wave (tsuboi method) (Mi/Mwp), Version=6
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usb0001c65



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by lasertaglover
 


Very often the very deep earthquakes do not have any aftershocks. Just occasionally there will be a series of deep large quakes but these could probably be more equated to a swarm than after shocks. Moro gulf is one such example,
edit on 10/2/2011 by PuterMan because: missing words, bad spelling - the usual stuff!




posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


It makes sense that the deeper ones have less.

Thank you very much!



posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 

I missed that one yesterday when I looked, did they add it later


since the 2 Celebes Sea deep quakes there have been these deep quakes also (in ascending order)
4.9, 2011/02/11 03:31:32, -23.288, -179.849, 558.3, SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS
4.8, 2011/02/11 01:29:28, -15.023, -177.638, 363.0, FIJI REGION
4.9, 2011/02/10 22:02:23, -23.307, -179.773, 542.3, SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS
4.7, 2011/02/10 16:41:05, -23.893, -179.878, 486.6, SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS

6.7, 2011/02/10 14:41:57, 3.966, 123.125, 512.2 , CELEBES SEA
6.5, 2011/02/10 14:39:29, 4.126, 123.017, 528.4, CELEBES SEA

edit on 10-2-2011 by muzzy because: has been this changed to have been these

edit on 10-2-2011 by muzzy because: ha! I forgot to actually change it after explaining reason

edit on 10-2-2011 by muzzy because: add the words "deep quakes"



posted on Feb, 11 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Are you indicating a connection between these?

They are 4000 miles apart so what would be the connection, or are you just observing the they are deep?



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join