It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 258
203
<< 255  256  257    259  260  261 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoMom
 


ID number is all wrong on that. It will be reposted shortly with correct info I have no doubt.

It is Shemya, Alaska


edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


Little cracker: SMY.AT..BHZ.2011.257


edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 01:26 PM
link   
We are at 187.5 days in the eq cycle, and wow..........the upper west coast is starting to sing like a canary.

I really hope the cycle is broken.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoMom
 

just been put on, Near Islands

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
OK...trying again...some screen shots of the strange reading going on in Louisiana














posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
Good job!!!

The first one (thin, wavy lines) is most likely just interference. We see this a lot on various stations on GEE. Definately NOT quakes. The second looks like either local noise, or picking up on distant, small quake.

Anytime I see a signal fall into the negative range, like the next one, makes me suspect something OTHER than a quake....which is what I have been seeing with most of these signals.

However...there is one right now on station TA.343 which looks more like a quake.
edit on 14-9-2011 by westcoast because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:01 PM
link   
Here is the USGS for the 6.1:


Magnitude
6.1
Date-Time
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 18:10:07 UTC
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 09:10:07 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
53.138°N, 173.022°E
Depth
1 km (~0.6 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region
NEAR ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
Distances
27 km (16 miles) NNW of Attu, Alaska
87 km (54 miles) WNW of Shemya Island, Alaska
3180 km (1975 miles) W of WHITEHORSE, Yukon Territory, Canada
3236 km (2010 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 16.8 km (10.4 miles); depth +/- 4.5 km (2.8 miles)
Parameters
NST=250, Nph=250, Dmin=85.7 km, Rmss=0.83 sec, Gp=115°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=6
Source
Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0005ucf

Be Well.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Except it isn't. Just more of the same ol same old 343A.TA..BHZ.2011.257

I think you may as well ignore these stations while the PTB are tunnelling.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:09 PM
link   
One more....




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
So I'm still thinking that this negative signal has to be coming from something causing negative pressure. ie. a percussion, cavitation, as you would get with an explosion. I guess anything that causes a loud boom would do the same thing. Here is an example, in graph format, of what the energy release from an explosion looks like:





The thing is.....these signals started right after the quakes in Colorado and Virgnia, right? I can't imagine ANY kind of work site would have THAT many explosions involved...and StealthyKat is right, they are showing up on numerous stations to varying degrees....centered around the one showing the negative signature.

SO...I think we have something going on that is causing a shock wave...but what??



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Thanks hehe
So we still don't know..



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


It's just weird. I made sure to look at all the staions surrounding it just to be sure it wasn't just that one.....I hate not knowing the answer to something!



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


I always get so horny when I see your avatar...Sorry for leaping off topic-but could not help myself



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 



However...there is one right now on station TA.343 which looks more like a quake.


I have some sound now. Which quake like signal was it exactly?

19:14?



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Chew on THIS haha! Another WTH????


files.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 9/14/2011 by StealthyKat because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


Just before the first big on on that plot is the one around 18:45 (not visible on that) that I think WC was saying was like an earthquake.

This is the spectrum of that



That is no earthquake. All around 10 to 15 Hz and really nothing below that.

The sound of the 1845 and 1914 coming up
edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


Nineteen-fourteen-343A-11-09-14.flac
Eighteen-fortyfive-343A-11-09-14.flac

edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 02:59 PM
link   
Things that make ya go hmmmm........(thanks to JadedANDCynical)


Interesting article about electrical discharge and earthquakes




If, as stated above, the charge differential between layers becomes too great, a double layer can explode, releasing all of its energy flow instantaneously. So, earthquakes can be considered a form of underground lightning. If there is a break in the strata, permitting magma to reach the surface, the arc discharge might connect to the outside and a lightning bolt will leap from the cone of a volcano.

If earthquakes are underground lightning bolts, then perhaps seismic waves are the thunderclaps. In that case, it seems likely that the majority of energy release during an earthquake is not from the fracturing and movement of rock strata, but is the result of electrical energy detonating within the matrix.




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


So what does that mean exactly? I not as educated in this subject as some of you here.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


It means it is not an earthquake in the normal sense but if the link WC posted is right then maybe it is? !!

That is getting deep into the electric universe theory and plasma cosmology however we are NOT dealing with magma here let's just get that straight. These signals can also be seen in places like Long Valley and Yellowstone............................................................................................................



edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)


Oh and others. Just kidding.....
edit on 14/9/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Ohhhh I see
Well here is one more...just because I have it anyway. WITH the "slider" haha




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


I took another recording from 1910 to 2010 and all of this is the same stuff whether it is big spikes or little spikes. The frequency range is from around 3 Hz to 15 Hz

It has to be electrical discharge or similar.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 255  256  257    259  260  261 >>

log in

join