It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 149
203
<< 146  147  148    150  151  152 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by radpetey
 


In 1964, there was a 9.2 earthquake in Alaska. I don't know what part it was in, but that is still massive. It's weird. A few hours ago I was just thinking about The Big One for British Columbia so I type in 'earthquake' in google news search and the info on the Alaska quake comes up. Seems like these big earthquakes are getting closer and closer to BC. If the Big One happens before/during 2012, i expect the 2012 fear to raise to even higher heights.




posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 01:33 AM
link   

4.3 2011/06/24 05:46:38 51.874 -171.820 36.3 168 km (104 mi) ESE of Atka, AK
4.7 2011/06/24 04:20:47 51.904 -171.926 32.7 160 km ( 99 mi) E of Atka, AK
7.2 2011/06/24 03:09:40 52.008 -171.859 62.6 162 km (101 mi) E of Atka, AK


earthquake.usgs.gov...
edit on 24-6-2011 by berkeleygal because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by StarTraveller
 



Hey, you're not imagining things. There was a 3.6 in Devon/Cornwall.



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:01 AM
link   

Magnitude 6.3
SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
Friday, June 24, 2011 at 06:33:06 UTC
Friday, June 24, 2011 at 05:33:06 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
10.919°S, 165.945°E

Depth
62.6 km (38.9 miles)

Distances
25 km (15 miles) SSE of Lata, Santa Cruz Islands, Solomon Isl.
444 km (275 miles) E of Kira Kira, San Cristobal, Solomon Isl.
677 km (420 miles) ESE of HONIARA, Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands
2280 km (1416 miles) NE of BRISBANE, Queensland, Australia

Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 15.4 km (9.6 miles); depth +/- 9 km (5.6 miles)
Parameters
NST=281, Nph=290, Dmin=676.8 km, Rmss=0.68 sec, Gp= 40°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=8
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0004fa3


earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:42 AM
link   
Its a 7.3 M here.

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Tsunami warning issued in western coastal areas of North America
edit on 24-6-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   
Any update about damage or Tsunami?



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:47 AM
link   
PDF Package for Mag 7.2 in Fox Islands, Aluetian Islands Region now available. (2.2 Mb download)

Fox Islands 2011-06-24 usc0004f5m.zip

Images only from web page (Smaller download 1.1 Mb) 7zip file can be opened with 7zip or WinRar. Don't know about WinZip.
Fox Islands 2011-06-24 usc0004f5m_images.7z

View web version of page here



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:49 AM
link   
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


That is because RSOE are notorious for not updating information. They post it once and that is it, even if it is doubled up.

They also fail to remove quakes that are computer generated errors. Whilst RSOE might be OK for chemical spills, vehicle accidents etc I would not use it for earthquakes under any circumstances.

If you want serious sites (and even they get it wrong) take your pick from here or the sidebar of that page. Yes RSOE is in that list. I am not saying don't use, just don't depend on it.



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:51 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Okey thanks for the tip



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:53 AM
link   
reply to post by phoenixlights321
 


The 7.2 in Alaska could be followed in a month or so by an 8+

But then again it probably won't be.


Edit to say:
This is directly at variance with another prognostication of mine which just goes to show that it is all conjecture and guessing. Does that make me a scientist I wonder?



edit on 24/6/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 05:00 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


gday PuterMan...

was just noticing...

both of the "big ones" today were at the exact same depths...62.6kms...

coincidence?

plus: we normally have 4 or 5 E/Qs of MAG 5+ per day,
two of 6+ per week, and one 7+ per month ROUGHLY

TODAY we have had 3 x 5+s, a 6+ AND a 7+...also 3 other 6s this week..

theres a whole lotta shakin goin on !

seeya



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 05:09 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


also: are U calling the 8+ (next month) for ALASKA too??? or somewhere else?

i hear the smart money is still on JAPAN !!!

that E/Q yesterday (the 5.2) was interesting...
= further south than the bulk of the JAP activity...
ie: KYUSHU... + making me think that there is still more activity in store,
+ possibly closer to TOKYO next time...

just thinkin out loud...

seeya



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by shaneR
 



also: are U calling the 8+ (next month) for ALASKA too??? or somewhere else?


Well I would not say I was calling it. Just idle speculation, but yes Alaska. It won't happen!

Depths? I guess it must be coincidence since that is not what you could call a default depth! Maybe the outer layer of the earth is getting ready to peel off at the 62.6 mark. Just kidding!



plus: we normally have 4 or 5 E/Qs of MAG 5+ per day,
two of 6+ per week, and one 7+ per month ROUGHLY


4 or 5 Mag 5 - yes
2 Mag 6 per week? Probably a bit under. There are around 130 to 150 per year.
1 Mag 7 a month? On the low side - getting closer to 2 last year with 21 x 7+


KYUSHU


Always a good bit happening there.

Edit to add:

i hear the smart money is still on JAPAN !!!


Nope, not smart money. Losers that keep the bookies in Rolls Royces! For reasons that I have posted before it won't be Japan. The ONLY possible place is Alaska. Just you wait and see how wrong I am if I am right.



edit on 24/6/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 05:36 AM
link   
OK, in relation to RSOE as it happens another member asked me a question about the earthquakes that RSOE are showing at Campi Flegri.

Here is the page. Scroll to the end and you will see a list of seismic activity. To all intents and purposes this appears at first glance to be related to Campi Flegri.

That is NOT an unreasonable assumption to make as it is on the Campi Flegri page. Generally I believe that this is the case - the activity posted relates to the area of concern.

BUT - currently at least - the Campi Flegri list is NOT related to Campi Flegri but is world wide, or actually now I have scanned it - Japan!

Here is the list:
Date Time Magnitude Depth
2011-06-23 10:15:58 4.7 35 Km - This is Honshu, Japan
2011-06-22 21:50:53 Mw 6. 40 Km - This is Honshu, Japan and is actually 6.7
2011-06-22 14:29:00 5.5 40 Km - This is Honshu, Japan
2011-06-13 06:50:35 5.0 40 Km - This is also Honshu, Japan
2011-06-13 00:25:28 4.8 20 Km - Yup this is also Honshu, Japan.
2011-06-09 18:15:55 5.0 52 Km - Did you guess this one? Yup Japan
2011-06-08 07:53:46 4.7 30 Km - Just for a change this is Hokkaido - but yup - Japan.
2011-06-07 03:52:31 4.7 32 Km - Bet you did not get this one? Japan, Honshu.
2011-06-06 00:46:47 4.8 40 Km - Boring - Honshu Japan again!
2011-06-01 18:37:06 4.7 70 Km - Maybe this will be different? Nope. Honshu, Japan.

Bythe way Honshu is located just off the coast of Italy.
Well it is now according to RSOE!



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 05:53 AM
link   
RSOE may be archivist oriented who keeps automated computer alerts, this case from NOAA PTWC.

It was double listed for a few minutes.





The old NOAA 7.3 and prior to downgrade 7.4 with regional Mw magnitude type.






posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 06:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Anneke
reply to post by StarTraveller
 



Hey, you're not imagining things. There was a 3.6 in Devon/Cornwall.


The day I decide to take a brake from quake watching, and what happens!! One in my own country.
Its showing on the BGS as:


NEWTON ABBOT,DEVON
June 23, 2011
Time: 13:43:38.1
Lat./Lon.: 50.574 -3.741
National Grid: 276.7 km E, 76.4 km N
Depth: 1.9
Magnitude: 2.7
Intensity: 3
FELT DEVON





edit on 24/6/11 by boo1981 because: spelling



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 06:30 AM
link   
PDF Package for Mag 6.3 in Santa Cruz Islands, Solomon Islands now available. (1.2 Mb download)

usc0004fa3.zip

Web site images only (7zipped) 0.5 Mb
usc0004fa3_images.7z

View web version of page here



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 06:42 AM
link   
reply to post by jjjtir
 


Yup It happens. Unfortunate some sites are not as quick to, or never, upgrade to the latest details.

Double listing happens often as the computer system may interpret a large quake as two due to the massive voltage differences coming in from the instrument. This rarely happens with lower magnitude quakes except where there are transmission line losses which cause 'phantom' earthquakes. Double listing is a similar effect.

I try not to publish any info myself until at least 6 hours after the event when things have settled down.


RSOE may be archivist oriented who keeps automated computer alerts, this case from NOAA PTWC.


I also keep old versions - all of them - but I try not to publish old material!!


Not knocking them, but saying be aware. Actually I am. If they can get the listing once they can also get the update unless they are using RSS feeds? Maybe those don't update? The data I use is the 7 day text file so ANY changes inside the initial 7 day period are captured. NONE of theses sites are gospel! ....and yes it is sloppy computer work!



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Not reported by any Networks 5.1 Bay of Plenty,23rd UTC, Deep

Magnitude, Reference, Latitude, Longitude, UTC Date (yyyy/mm/dd), UTC Time (hh:mm:ss), Depth, Location,
5.135, 3533879, -36.85762, 176.88052, 2011/6/23 0:31:59, 276, o/s N of Mayor Valley, Bay of Plenty, Not Reported as Felt

You can see it on this siesmo from Bud Explorer though(at the top) www.iris.edu...

No use looking for it on SNZO LISS graph, its saturated with Fox Islands 7.2
edit on 24-6-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)


A wee swarm going on offshore Castlepoint, Wairarapa too Map
edit on 24-6-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   
well..... looking at today;s list of EQ's we can state that CME's triggers EQ's???????
with other words an cloud of particles has the same effect of an bang with an sledgehammer
edit on 24-6-2011 by ressiv because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2011 by ressiv because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 146  147  148    150  151  152 >>

log in

join