It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 137
203
<< 134  135  136    138  139  140 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 04:15 AM
link   
Felt over a large area by a lot of people
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Check out these seismos
folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...

interesting ones to me, so far, still looking, are
Bernie and Guam
looks like activity earlier




posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:50 AM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


This is what it did to my house in Arkansas.

www.facebook.com...



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Yep, felt it all the way to Springfield for some. Many reports of people pretty far away from the epicenter. I was just thinking last night of looking up how many EQs in Mo. throughout history, and went to bed instead, woke in the night to the news report on this one.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 11:23 AM
link   
Is it possible the 4.2 earthquake in MO was felt as far as Ohio? Check out this link from the USGS seismogram displays.

4:15 AM Alum Creek, OH

Looks like it has been downgraded to a 3.9? Do I have the right day?
edit on 7-6-2011 by MountainEnigma because: To add comment.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 





This may be of interest too all those concerned.

Me.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


There goes the "eyebrow" look up



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
Nothing unusual happened on 6/7 June, earthquake wise. Well not in the sense we can link it unconditionally to the sun. Except on the weather front. For the whole of 6 June no earthquake in the whole world over 5.0; only one above 4.5 at Philippines (4.6) if we discards the Honshu aftershocks.

As for the sun; events started off on 5th are still ongoing. We are so fortunate this went in direction of Jupiter. That M2.5 flare was not magnetically strong, but it was huge in electrical and radio content.

Thus, not-so-normal Earthquakes are still on the check list.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   
reply to post by SusanFrey
 


Looks like you need to anchor that light to a joist and not just through the drywall.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 10:40 PM
link   
It certainly seems predicting where a quake
may appear is becoming more difficult to
determine. We had a quake several months
ago and I went around the house afterward
doing a little earthquake proofing. Glad you
are alright Susan - I don't think you are going
to forget this year anytime soon.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by MountainEnigma
 


Yeah it really ticks me off as it was here when we purchased the house.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by crazydaisy
 


I know I will never forget this year. LOL!!! It's been a booger!



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by MountainEnigma
 


Yes you have the right day.

I would say the long red streak at around 08:13 UTC is probably it.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


GUAM? How come?

Seismograph Station Code for GUAM

I know, I can see it as well, but I can't find a station GUAM or anything close on the NM network.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Pu,

Here is the link
folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...

scroll down to see GUAM, MO

eta
OK I saw your links, my answer is, I dont know
edit on 8-6-2011 by berkeleygal because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Ya, I was not questioning what you put but what they put.

I was wanting to get a location of the siesmo because that looks like trains to me.

Edit to add: Mind you that is 28.57 mVolts so it could be mouse farts.
edit on 8/6/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 06:02 PM
link   
The PDF files for the 6.0 on the Peru/Bolivia border are now available.

usc00042cc.zip




posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 08:46 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


The GUAM you have pulled up is not for Missouri, but the actually country of GUAM. Notice on your link that it lists a different CODE QCP or something. The one Berkley Girl is referring to is for GUAM, MO.

Just thought I'd clarify. Trying to be helpful.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 07:16 AM
link   
reply to post by MountainEnigma
 


Thanks, I have found it now that I know there is a Guam in MO.

GUAMO 36.8892 -89.839 172 CERI Open Guam

As you can see they are using the wrong code on the seismogram.



posted on Jun, 9 2011 @ 06:04 PM
link   
The California quake today was interesting to me....

4.4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA32.66°N -115.74°W 15Km Deep 2011-06-09 15:22:12 UTC2011-06-09 08:22:12 LOCAL



posted on Jun, 10 2011 @ 11:25 AM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 134  135  136    138  139  140 >>

log in

join