It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 111
203
<< 108  109  110    112  113  114 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:10 PM
link   
4.5 EQ in central cali with a depth of only 1.2 miles?

This bares watching unless the depth is an error.

This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 4.5
Date-Time Tuesday, May 03, 2011 at 21:41:49 UTC
Tuesday, May 03, 2011 at 02:41:49 PM at epicenter

Location 36.396°N, 117.878°W
Depth 2 km (1.2 miles)
Region CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Distances 10 km (6 miles) S (183°) from Keeler, CA
16 km (10 miles) ENE (57°) from Cartago, CA
18 km (11 miles) NE (36°) from Olancha, CA
27 km (17 miles) SE (141°) from Lone Pine, CA
239 km (149 miles) W (276°) from Las Vegas, NV

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.5 km (0.3 miles); depth +/- 1 km (0.6 miles)
Parameters Nph= 43, Dmin=18 km, Rmss=0.25 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=z
Source California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR

Event ID ci14978940




posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   

This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude
4.5

Date-Time
Tuesday, May 03, 2011 at 21:41:49 UTC
Tuesday, May 03, 2011 at 02:41:49 PM at epicenter

Location
36.396°N, 117.878°W

Depth
2 km (1.2 miles)

Region
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

Distances
10 km (6 miles) S (183°) from Keeler, CA
16 km (10 miles) ENE (57°) from Cartago, CA
18 km (11 miles) NE (36°) from Olancha, CA
27 km (17 miles) SE (141°) from Lone Pine, CA
239 km (149 miles) W (276°) from Las Vegas, NV

Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 0.5 km (0.3 miles); depth +/- 1 km (0.6 miles)

Parameters
Nph= 43, Dmin=18 km, Rmss=0.25 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=z

Source
California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGSCaltechCGSUCBUCSDUNR

Event ID
ci14978940



earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Disconnected Sociopath
 



This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.


Once it is looked at it will be/should change.



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boo1981
reply to post by Disconnected Sociopath
 



This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.


Once it is looked at it will be/should change.


Let's hope so, becasue if it's truly that shallow (or turns out to be really deep) that certainly could be a precursor to a much larger event...



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:54 PM
link   
Pretty poor response to this by the usgs people, its been over an hour now and they haven't even got the Phase Data up yet, let alone a review of the data

At least EMSC has published something, phase data, but no magnitudes
, www.emsc-csem.org...

they use the same data from NEIR

Maybe it didn't really happen



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 08:23 PM
link   
3 and half hours and still no review of that "4.5" and theusgs 7 days page seems to have siezed up as well

Been one aftershock there, at 100 metres deep
;

Src,Eqid,Version,Datetime,Lat,Lon,Magnitude,Depth,NST,Region
ci,14978948,z,"Tuesday, May 3, 2011 22:00:18 UTC",36.3260,-117.9015,1.5,0.10,25,"Central California"

earthquake.usgs.gov...

someone should go and take a look at the rip in the ground

edit on 3-5-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 09:41 PM
link   
I am not sure about all you, but I feel as if everything is all too quiet with very few exceptions today. For the more educated on the subject . . . are things calming down after the Japan release . . . in your opinion, or is it building to another large release of energy in the very near future. I am thinking the later for some reason . . . in the very near future . . . a major release (not a prediction).
edit on 3-5-2011 by nonnez because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-5-2011 by nonnez because: Errors in thinking



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 10:46 PM
link   
Hey fam,

look at the past few quakes...today

4.5 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA.40°N -117.88°W 2Km Deep 2011-05-03 21:41:49 UTC2011-05-03 14:41:49 LOCAL CI14978940 55
V 5.0 TAIWAN23.91°N 121.73°E 43Km Deep 2011-05-03 15:52:35 UTC2011-05-03 23:52:35 LOCAL USC00034K2 13
II 2.5 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA40.07°N -121.54°W 0Km Deep 2011-05-03 15:28:47 UTC2011-05-03 08:28:47 LOCAL NC71564230 3
III 3.1 GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CALIFORNIA4.08°N -117.86°W 10Km Deep 2011-05-03 08:27:32 UTC2011-05-03 01:27:32 LOCAL CI14978652 370
III 2.6 GEORGIA, USA33.24°N -82.77°W 28Km Deep 2011-05-03 05:59:16 UTC2011-05-03 01:59:16 LOCAL SE050311A 8
II 1.4 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA[/b]37.56°N -118.88°W 7Km Deep 2011-05-03 05:13:12 UTC2011-05-02 22:13:12 LOCAL NC71563950 2
III 2.3 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII19.56°N -155.96°W 5Km Deep 2011-05-03 04:51:09 UTC2011-05-02 18:51:09 LOCAL HV60233191 15
II 1.7 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA37.60°N -122.46°W 7Km Deep 2011-05-03 04:17:19 UTC2011-05-02 21:17:19 LOCAL NC71563920

lots of California quakes, even some Georgia ones (?)

Dang.....
edit on 3-5-2011 by ButterCookie because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-5-2011 by ButterCookie because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 10:50 PM
link   
reply to post by nonnez
 

I'm not sure about the rest of the World today ( haven't looked yet) but NZ was twitching all over the place in the last 24hrs after a quiet few days late last week - 31 quakes today.
Noticed on JMA nothing over 4.9 for 3 days so yes looks like they are tapering off there
www.jma.go.jp...



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


That's what I mean, with few exceptions it is quiet . . . and like you posted . . . we can see where the little bit of action is, in very specific regions. Also take a look at the changes in the N.W. seismographs, nothing major, but there has been a definite change in activity in my opinion . . . more specifically in S.W. Washington through to northern California. Maybe I just need less coffee . . .
edit on 3-5-2011 by nonnez because: ate changed to at



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 10:58 PM
link   
reply to post by nonnez
 


I am actually thinking along the same lines as you, about a major one, especially the New Madrid.

With all this discussion about Bin Laden and the outrageous lies we are being told about it, I am starting to think like some of the posters of those discussion boards; that our 'attack' may just as well be the New Madrid fault zone...



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 11:22 PM
link   
just had a 3.1 and 2.6 in East Los Angeles, and the depth is pretty shallow, this could be a bad news.



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 11:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by MikeBoss
just had a 3.1 and 2.6 in East Los Angeles, and the depth is pretty shallow, this could be a bad news.


Sadly, I think you are maybe right...

too much action over there lately....plus a few in Minnesota and Georgia??

This is scary at this point...



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 03:20 AM
link   

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.


Magnitude
3.7
Date-Time
Wednesday, May 04, 2011 at 08:10:45 UTC
Wednesday, May 04, 2011 at 01:10:45 AM at epicenter
Location
36.387°N, 117.872°W
Depth
3.9 km (2.4 miles)
Region
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Distances
11 km (7 miles) S (180°) from Keeler, CA
16 km (10 miles) ENE (61°) from Cartago, CA
18 km (11 miles) NE (39°) from Olancha, CA
28 km (18 miles) SE (141°) from Lone Pine, CA
238 km (148 miles) W (276°) from Las Vegas, NV
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 0.4 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 1.3 km (0.8 miles)
Parameters
Nph= 39, Dmin=19 km, Rmss=0.23 sec, Gp=101°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=3
Source
California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR
Event ID
ci10936853



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 04:56 AM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


So we have a 3.7 that HAS been reviewed.

I have looked on USGS and the 4.5 has STILL NOT been reviewed its saying???? Why



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 03:29 PM
link   
What's going on here?


4.2 2011/05/04 16:26:26 30.691 -105.799 10.0 67 km ( 42 mi) S of Fort Hancock, TX
4.2 2011/05/03 02:58:30 30.677 -105.767 10.6 69 km ( 43 mi) S of Fort Hancock, TX
3.9 2011/05/02 19:07:15 33.068 -100.777 5.0 28 km ( 17 mi) SW of Jayton, TX
4.4 2011/05/02 13:55:37 30.730 -105.674 10.0 60 km ( 37 mi) SSW of Sierra Blanca, TX
4.3 2011/05/02 11:43:31 30.794 -105.695 9.8 55 km ( 34 mi) SW of Sierra Blanca, TX
4.1 2011/04/28 04:58:35 30.704 -105.762 10.0 66 km ( 41 mi) S of Fort Hancock, TX
4.3 2011/04/28 01:03:42 30.775 -105.729 10.2 58 km ( 36 mi) SW of Sierra Blanca, TX


Source

All these strange quakes lately. I don't get it.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


It happened!! CWC.CI..BHE.2011.123

That right on top of it so I would say maybe not a 4.5

A few more today CWC.CI..BHE.2011.124

Now MPM which 54Km away does show like a 4+ MPM.CI..BHE.2011.123

RCT is 120 Km away but does not show it strongly. RCT.CI..BHE.2011.123



edit on 4/5/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


I think these are gas or oil wells. That is part of the area they are fracking in there.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by SusanFrey
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


I think these are gas or oil wells. That is part of the area they are fracking in there.


I don't think so, Susan. They are in Mexico, close to the Texas border. And much bigger than your average fracking or oil wells. Not to mention the depth of the... 6.0 miles, give or take. That's deeper than most fracking.

Something is definitely going on down there!



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:34 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Indeed


Not that rare, I'm sure there was a decent sized swarm at Owens Lake last year, same spot, on the south shore.
edit on 4-5-2011 by muzzy because: (no reason given)







 
203
<< 108  109  110    112  113  114 >>

log in

join