It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
What if the threat is real, how dumb would you feel when people start getting poisoned?
What could it hurt if people/hotels/restaurants are more aware?
America is not exactly the most popular country right now, are you claiming nobody wants to harm Americans?
edit on 20-12-2010 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
I never said they were trying to kill anyone.
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
If they were all about advancing food supply, why are they suing small farmers to the point where the family farms have no alternative but to go out of business? Putting farms out of business does not advance the food supply.
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
Why does Monsanto wish to patent every seed on the planet?
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
Just a sample of Monsanto's irresponsibility:
Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity....These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown."
Monsanto gathered its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn was safe for consumption.
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
Monsanto said their corn was safe to eat in response to the report released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences.
"Organ damage? No problem, just eat our corn!!!!!"
Yea, that definitely sounds like a company deserving of support.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Well the cost looks pretty nasty:
Originally posted by Frogs
Oh my what timing....
Senate passes food-safety bill
This bill is a pretty nasty bit of work if you dig into it.
What else is nasty about it?
The bill is expected to cost $1.4 billion over the next four years, including the expense of hiring 2,000 new FDA inspectors.
Originally posted by Pervius
Does anyone really think the Government would tell it's citizens if the food or water supply was poisoned?
All I see is text. No source. I don't even see their peer review. I don't see their scientific tests. How do I know how controlled the experiments are? How do I know that other things were not the cause?
It's also a business. If someone is illegally using a product you invented without permission, you can sue them. The farmers were technically stealing.
At the time, Roundup Ready canola was in use by several farmers in the area. Schmeiser claimed that he did not plant the initial Roundup Ready canola, and that his field of custom-bred canola had been accidentally contaminated.
Possibly routes of this gene flow include seed which escaped from passing trucks containing Roundup Ready harvests, or natural, accidental pollination. Monsanto initially claimed that Schmeiser planted Roundup Ready Canola in his fields intentionally, though they could offer no evidence for this.
The company later admitted that it was possible for unintentional gene flow to have resulted in the initial presence of Roundup Ready Canola in Schmeiser's field.
Our food and water are already poisoned. All that they have to do it "ooops, sorry machine failed and put in too much". 2 tablespoons of MSG will kill and average size dog.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
Wait... wait... wait...
So they're going after the U.S. because of the food poison bill, I mean food safety bill?
What about codex alimentarius? What about monsanto or GMO's.
What about McDonald's? What about pesticides? Which one of these methods will the terrorists use?
Originally posted by GirlGenius
reply to post by Urantia1111
I hate buffets to begin with! We rarely eat out because I really want to know how the food is prepared. Going organic is the only way these days.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
Wait... wait... wait...
So they're going after the U.S. because of the food poison bill, I mean food safety bill?
What about codex alimentarius? What about monsanto or GMO's.
What about McDonald's? What about pesticides? Which one of these methods will the terrorists use?
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
What if the threat is real, how dumb would you feel when people start getting poisoned?
What could it hurt if people/hotels/restaurants are more aware?
America is not exactly the most popular country right now, are you claiming nobody wants to harm Americans?
edit on 20-12-2010 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)