Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Pedophilia Guide Author Arrested

page: 6
23
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by JoeMaine
 


My kids are safe. So dont fret! It amazes me the nerve of some folks.. I take steps to assure my childrens safety. I am a better parent than yours were apparently.




posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Miraj
 


I give you a star for that. Hit on the nail, If you want to control people, then just tack on that you're doing it for the children. Because once you mention children, then everyone's for it.
If people would just take responsibility for themselves, then there wouldn't be excuses for government intervention.
Like you said, you can't have it both ways.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by JoeMaine
 


My kids are safe. So dont fret! It amazes me the nerve of some folks.. I take steps to assure my childrens safety. I am a better parent than yours were apparently.


Apparently you're not if you feel the need for the government to step in and have a guy raped and all the crazy things you mentioned. Obviously you feel you're a lousy parent and can't protect them yourself if you feel the need to have our rights shredded up and any sort of open society discarded because you can't do your job as a parent. And literally you've been on the computer rambling emotionally about this for hours, are you sure your kids aren't huffing glue right now?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


You are mistaking defending his RIGHTS with defending or agreeing with his position. You couldn't be more wrong. Maybe you can't separate them in your mind, but that doesn't mean no one can.


For those of you who are raging, "I don't care if what he's doing is against the law or not"! Think about what you're saying.


Im simply saying that most of you defending him are more concerned about his rights. You are not concerned of the moral issue at hand of what you are defending. They obviously got him on criminal charges for the book. So he obviously violated the law. Simple as that. We all have our opinions. Maybe we can agree to disagree.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


K, how about a list of the books, authors, and subjects you feel it should be against the law in the United States of America. Not actions now, just books, authors, and subjects. So far, we have this one book. What else do you feel should be banned? Should we form a consensus or is your answer THE answer? Let's start banning now!


Where are you getting that from? What did i say should or shouldnt be banned? I think you have me confused. Maybe a case of selective reading?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by sonjah1
Sure there is fiction.


You know, this got me thinking. What if the author promoted it as fiction and wrote it in the form of a fake journal a la "Flowers for Algernon?" If it contained the same instructions and basic content, would it be ok since it would then be fiction?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


The police aren't getting paid to enforce moralities. They are there to uphold the law. Unfortunately most of the world is immoral. but weather people are or not, that's just the way the human race is. I don't believe this is an issue of whats moral or not, it's an issue of legality. So far that's pending in the FL court system. So how can you damn one to be raped and murdered if he hasn't even been found guilty of anything?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by SKinLaB

Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


K, how about a list of the books, authors, and subjects you feel it should be against the law in the United States of America. Not actions now, just books, authors, and subjects. So far, we have this one book. What else do you feel should be banned? Should we form a consensus or is your answer THE answer? Let's start banning now!


Where are you getting that from? What did i say should or shouldnt be banned? I think you have me confused. Maybe a case of selective reading?


Maybe you meant to write something else then?


Regardless of whether or not it is freedom of speech, i think it is pretty deplorable.The lack of morals of the people who are defending this pig over the freedom of speech issue is sickening. I don't care about the legalities if he was allowed to or not. Yeah it's just a book. We are talking about a book that is a guide to pedophilia. Legal or not, some of you are over looking what it is about all because Awwwww, the poor guys rights have been violated. It amazes me of what some of you defend on this site.


It looks an awful lot to me like you are saying it is ok to be arrested for writing a book. Are you not saying that?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


I think owning a pitbull is completely immoral and that the owners of pitbulls should be castrated and spurned from society. Pitbulls are dangerous animals responsible for the death of many children and the injury of many people. Anyone who advocates the ownership of a pitbull should be thrown in prison with no hope of ever getting out. I don't give a damn if it's legal or not. Children are being murdered and pitbull owners just want to confuse the issue. I would totally support a bill where cops could routinely roust and beat pitbull owners just because something has to be done.
edit on 20-12-2010 by JoeMaine because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mastermook
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


The police aren't getting paid to enforce moralities. They are there to uphold the law. Unfortunately most of the world is immoral. but weather people are or not, that's just the way the human race is. I don't believe this is an issue of whats moral or not, it's an issue of legality. So far that's pending in the FL court system. So how can you damn one to be raped and murdered if he hasn't even been found guilty of anything?


I'm not speaking of the law enforcing morality. I'm speaking of the people with the lack of morals that are so concerned about defending his rights. There is no winning for losing on this. I have my opinion on the matter as well as you. I will not see it your way as you will not mine. If i am wrong in the way i see it, then i will choose to be wrong.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Originally posted by SKinLaB

Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


K, how about a list of the books, authors, and subjects you feel it should be against the law in the United States of America. Not actions now, just books, authors, and subjects. So far, we have this one book. What else do you feel should be banned? Should we form a consensus or is your answer THE answer? Let's start banning now!


Where are you getting that from? What did i say should or shouldnt be banned? I think you have me confused. Maybe a case of selective reading?




Maybe you meant to write something else then?


Regardless of whether or not it is freedom of speech, i think it is pretty deplorable.The lack of morals of the people who are defending this pig over the freedom of speech issue is sickening. I don't care about the legalities if he was allowed to or not. Yeah it's just a book. We are talking about a book that is a guide to pedophilia. Legal or not, some of you are over looking what it is about all because Awwwww, the poor guys rights have been violated. It amazes me of what some of you defend on this site.


It looks an awful lot to me like you are saying it is ok to be arrested for writing a book. Are you not saying that?



Dude, im speaking about morals man.
edit on 20-12-2010 by SKinLaB because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by JoeMaine
reply to post by SKinLaB
 


I think owning a pitbull is completely immoral and that the owners of pitbulls should be castrated and spurned from society. Pitbulls are dangerous animals responsible for the death of many children and the injury of many people. Anyone who advocates the ownership of a pitbull should be thrown in prison with no hope of ever getting out. I don't give a damn if it's legal or not. Children are being murdered and pitbull owners just want to confuse the issue. I would totally support a bill where cops could routinely roust and beat pitbull owners just because something has to be done.
edit on 20-12-2010 by JoeMaine because: (no reason given)


Well unfortunately you are entitled to your own opinion. And it is unfortunate how uneducated you are about them. Another media victim.
edit on 20-12-2010 by SKinLaB because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by SKinLaB
Dude, im speaking about morals man.
edit on 20-12-2010 by SKinLaB because: (no reason given)


Yes, I know. You are saying it is ok that he was arrested for doing something you feel is immoral - writing a book. I am asking you what other writings you find immoral and worthy of arrest. Dude.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by SKinLaB
Well unfortunately you are entitled to your own opinion.


Ironic

Dontcha think?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 04:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Originally posted by SKinLaB
Well unfortunately you are entitled to your own opinion.


Ironic

Dontcha think?


Twist it how ever you like. What ever makes you happy bro. I stand by my words.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   
Is is my right to produce a manual for rapists, it may well help those who have thought about it, yet not had the wherewithal to carry out a rape, never mind my freedom of speech is paramount,

Wonder how those of you who are defending this man would feel , if after reading this book a paedophile decided to have a relationship with a young member of your family.

Should those who talk about the virtues of terrorism whilst never intending to carry a terrorist act out be allowed the same 'freedom of speech' never mind some young impressionable man or woman may be influenced and actually carry out acts of terror? as has happened.

Edited for spelling



edit on 20-12-2010 by dizzylizzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:23 PM
link   
reply to post by dizzylizzy
 


I believe it was called "the minority report" They arrested people for thinking about committing a crime.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Would gratefully appreciate the fact if the operators decided to voice their opinion rather than back tracking. Its here and open.


773234



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:37 PM
link   
So after 5 pages now, i guess my question is reasonable.

What is your stand on this ?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by SKinLaB
Im simply saying that most of you defending him are more concerned about his rights.


More concerned with his rights than what?



You are not concerned of the moral issue at hand of what you are defending.


You can't tell me what I'm concerned with. You don't know me. I tell YOU what I'm concerned with. Have we got that straight?
You don't know me and cannot tell me how my mind works or what I'm concerned with.

The TRUTH is, I am very concerned with pedophilia. As a victim of childhood sexual molestation, I am VERY concerned about that. So, you're wrong about that.

I am also VERY concerned with our freedoms being lost. And I defend our freedoms. I defend freedoms for those with whom I disagree. It's clear that some of you only want freedoms when they apply to you. It's hypocritical, is all I'm saying.



They obviously got him on criminal charges for the book. So he obviously violated the law.


Being CHARGED with something does not mean he's GUILTY of anything. That's not an opinion, that's the way our justice system works.

People who think the way you do are helping those who are infringing upon our rights one by one.
edit on 12/20/2010 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
23
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join