reply to post by Darkrunner
If you agree that the book is obscene and should be found obscene and unpublishable, then you ARE disagreeing with his right to publish.
Contradict yourself much?
He hasn't been proven guilty of obscenity charges.
What a brave patriot you are, prejudging a man you have never meet for a book you've (obviously) never read.
Again, you don't understand what freedom of speech/expression means. You should probably stop talking about it, since you keep making yourself look
like a contradictory hypocrite by saying people should be punished if they practice it... but in a way you don't like.
This is what? The third time you claim that this book details how to rape children.
When are you gonna cite your reference?
Never, because it would prove you wrong?
This guy hasn't been proven to have molested any children. So, just like a prior poster....
Either you have knowledge of his crimes and failed to report them, making you an accomplice.
You are just spouting nonsense that you can't prove....
You have no right trying to take the moral high-ground.
You want a man hurt and attacked, just like the OP wants him murdered.
Using your own grade-school logic....
A Human of any age can recover from rape.
A Human cannot recover from murder.
So, you are worse than you claim this author is, by your own standards.
edit on 28-12-2010 by Byteman because: (no reason given)