It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by peter_kandra
As much as I think this guy is a scum bag and should have his nuts cut off, he's free to write about whatever he wants. To me, it's no different than someone writing about making bombs or hacking. Now if his book contains child porn images and he's actually breaking a law, then that's different. Freedom of speech is a double edged sword folks.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by Resurrectio
Here's the trouble. You're advocating the death - in specific, the torturous, painful, prolonged death - of a man who wrote something you dislike. You express this opinion in such a way that it's incredibly obvious that seeing this man writhing in agony before expiring would bring you intense psychic, perhaps even physical pleasure.
So far as I'm aware, Philip R. Greaves' sole crime is violating a Floridian blue law that is, in all likelihood, being very selectively enforced and, just as likely, will be thrown out of court. Weird dude who wrote a creepy book? Sure. Worthy of some pervert spanking off and mouthbreathing while he's tortuously murdered? Probably not.
Why is it that the mention of pedophelia always brings out the guro pervs, exactly?
Florida law . The court stated that, "The essential element of the defense of entrapment is the absence of a predisposition of the defendant to commit the offense.
The entrapment defense prohibits law enforcement officers from instigating a criminal act by persons otherwise innocent in order to lure them to its commission and to punish them.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
I would never call you a dumbass.. Why did you feel it necessary to call me a dumbass in such a thinly veiled way?
I feel bad for you.. Your crazy little brain made that correlation, and it made you look silly. How are they related? Did the cartoon detail how to hunt and molest children? Did it detail stories of raping children? Did the Author of the cartoon say " I think 9 year olds are capable of making sexual decisions?"
Is this Author a Muslim? Is the cartoon artist a pedophile? Thats a tricky little cerebral cortex you have there.. It just comes up with really ranDUM correlations.
Other than both being on paper, how are these 2 related?
I have let my emotions get the best of me here..
I am going to be very very honest here. No BS.. NO Drama!
Do I hope this guy dies in custody... yes I do.. Sorry but I do.
Do I think that this book will be used by pedo's to assist in their attacks on children. I do.
Do I think that this man is a pedo time bomb ready to explode and ruin a family. I do.
Do I think that this was entrapment? It isn't .. not one person on this thread can prove it is entrapment. Other than being an armchair lawyer.. Come with facts.. I have looked up FL's laws.. this is not considered entrapment...
You can't say that you feel this is wrong.. can you? Its not illegal entrapment.. So that means you can't have an opinion saying otherwise??.. That's what I have done.. So don't be a hypocrite. I am not allowed to have an opinion that goes against the 1st, without being blasted .. so you can't either!
I think that the 1st amendment can be tweaked to cover this exact situation. I am not talking about porn.. bomb making. how to kill the president.. I am specifically talking about a "how to" book on how to molest children.
Why can't we make this change? Do you think the founding fathers would have meant for the 1st to cover this? No way! Are we to stupid to make logical updates to these amendment?
I understand where everyone is coming from on this I really do.. there are a few members that want to call names and show their ignorance.. All your doing is getting emotionally charged over something that you believe in... Similar but different of what I am doing..
I would like to see this man sent to prison for life.. Not for writing a book. As he sits.. he will be out soon.. I am hoping they recover evidence from his HD and that a victim comes forward and accuses this man of that he is teaching.
I see everyone agreeing that this is wrong.. But, your argument is 1st amendment.. So if the police found a way to legally get this guy.. INSIDE of the confines of the law... What is the problem?
This man is a scum bag.. After watching that video, I am convinced he has molested children.. Now before the armchair lawyers get up in arms.. That is MY OPINION!! I think this kid toucher is going to have a host of victims come forward, now that he is all over the news..
A few folks are making a correlation between my wanting the guy dead, and him writing a book detailing molesting children "safely" without detection.... If this makes me a hypocrite then so be it!
I hope they dig deep into this monsters PC and past transgressions and find him guilty of at least 30 to 40 years worth of nastiness! I can only assume in 40 years, the prisoners will find out about his hobbies and treat him to a really romantic stay in the pen.
I am making no apologies... Anyone that could sit down and write this book is a broken human.. they are not fixable! I really do hope this guys days are limited.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Having slogged through this, I will weigh in. I am the father of 2 and would kill any pervert who touched my kids. If on a jury, I would not vote to convict any other parent who killed one of these pervs.