It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RandalFlagg
reply to post by ericsnow
Thats a great idea, would the power at be allow it though? There is certain legislation that covers different aspects of marketing and advertising e.g. tobacco companies in the UK are not allowed to advertise there products. I dont no if this is the same in the US if their isn't any legislation stopping Alex Jones from advertising his messages I am sure the US Government would soon find a way to stop it.
S&F
PRISON PLANET.com. Copyright © Free Speech Systems LLC 2010.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by ericsnow
I would imagine it is because of economics. Billboards cost money, reach a limited audience, and are relatively inflexible - meaning a total overhaul is required to update them. Whereas hosting a few web domains can actually be a profitable venture. Jones gets enough hits on his sites to generate money FOR posting his own messages, as well as generating publicity for his other ventures. His site is also a storefront for his products.He gets PAID to throw his image on things, not the other way around.
And before anyone jumps up and suggest that Alex Jones cares NOT for money... Allow me to post what appears at the bottom of the Prison Planet page...
PRISON PLANET.com. Copyright © Free Speech Systems LLC 2010.
So, the answer to your question is pretty simple: Profit maximization, like any other Corporation would seek.
~Heff
edit on 12/20/10 by Hefficide because: typo
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by ericsnow
I'm saying that one doesn't need an LLC to copyright anything. One needs an LLC to limit liability and for a variety of tax and intellectual property management purposes. LLC stands for "limited liability company".
And, maybe the most telling reasons to have an LLC... they are far less subject to regulatory oversight and can provide a shelter for hiding personal wealth from the potential of lawsuit.
Is anyone really naive enough to believe that there is anyone in the media who is NOT out to get rich and famous?
~Heff