It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Larry Silverstein never spoke to any fire commander on 911

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 11:01 AM
link   
Silverstein has always said he spoke with a fire commander on 911 and told him to pull building 7. However in actual fact he didn't speak to ANY fire chief.

See this video:

www.youtube.com...

Notice how when asked the name of the fire commander he spoke to, he simply says 'next question'. Doesn't even bother saying 'i don't remember his name' just next question, next question.

What other secrets just he have hmmm.

Preety sick what he did, so he doesn't mind being part of mass murder cuz he knew he was gonna get around 1 million dollars per person killed. Just look at him in that video and how defensive he becomes when questioned about 911. So obvious...
edit on 20-12-2010 by tortillawraps because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 11:14 AM
link   
I must say that is a pretty weak argument, seen as it is very well possible he never knew his name.

Pull it is what people referred to as detonating charges for demolition. You me Silverstein. In the light of the Silverstein video some people felt compelled to educate us that that therm is not used at all by demolition experts. Apparently everybody but the demolition experts knew this. I dont know if this claim is true, but I do know Silverstein was not a demolition experts and if everybody but the demolition experts seem to associate that therm with the setting off of explosives I see no reason to not believe he was referring to a demolition of WTC 7 a story that was later retracted.

This site claims there were never firefighters in building 7 doing any firefighting. Jerry Banning recalls having been rescued escorted outside, at which point the rescue party left with him.

whatreallyhappened.com...

Maybe he wasnt aware that somebody did die in the WTC 7 demolition namely Master Special Officer Craig Miller.

Apparently the term pull it stems from the times when demolition experts actually physically pulled out walls or columns and what not and the therm sticked around event though they use explosives today.
edit on 20-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 11:36 AM
link   
While I don't doubt your good intentions, I hnestly believe this thread title is dishonest and discredits those who are seeing facts and truth. Silverstein refuses to answer an important question, and I agree that raises doubts and suspicisons, but it clearly doesn't prove he didn't speak to the firefighter.

I think that's a shame because this video is fascinating and an accurate title would have done it more credit.

It's fascinating to see his responses....he is not a happy man. He looks pretty angry and actually, imo, a bit worried. It's a question which must be fully answered by him at some point.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 12:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 


Umm, what is a Master Special Officer? Just curious, not familiar with that designation. Anything like Specialist Officer Gallop?



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by vipertech0596
 


Master Special Officer Craig J. Miller
United States Department of the Treasury - Secret Service Special Services Division
U.S. Government


www.odmp.org...

The biography of the crime displayed on this page says nothing about WT 7 and its collapse, maybe, by design.



posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 01:16 PM
link   
The thread title should read...
"Larry Silverstein lies about speaking to Fire commander on 911".



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 02:26 AM
link   
That's the first time I have ever heard that the antenna on the north tower is what cause the damage to wtc7. Is this mentioned in any of the NIST reports? Silverstien sure says it with conviction, also, I thought NIST said that there were no fuel lines and fuel stores ruptured, he also claims that this is what set wtc7 on fire.

Although a little painful to watch, but was still a interesting video. For a second there it sounded like he was gonna repeat word for word what he said on the PBS documentary, but he didn't.



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 03:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



This site claims there were never firefighters in building 7 doing any firefighting. Jerry Banning recalls having been rescued escorted outside, at which point the rescue party left with him. [/ex

FDNY had men inside WTC 7 searching building and trying to extinquish fires

Unfortunately without adequate water supply and once the degree of damage to the building was discovered
fire ground commanders made decision to remove the men from inside

Testimony of Capt Anthony Variale who was inside with his crew

graphics8.nytimes.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by All Seeing Eye
 

I

If read the article (theres that reading comprehension thing again...) would have noted that Miller RAN TOWARD
the burning towers to aid in rescues. Was caught in collapse of Tower 2 so was not in WTC 7

Miller's office was in WTC 7 - he had left the building and gone to towers

Sheesh doesn't anyone hear know how to read and then process the information



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 03:12 AM
link   
Larry like a lot of others got soo wrapped up in the idea of easy money that they did not give too much thought to what happens when people begin too see the lies. The media can only hold back 911 truth for so long. The internet has exploded massively since 2001 (which these people probally did not expect) and these akward questions will keep getting louder and louder. Larry rubbed his hands together when his buildings fell. Im not sure he be laughing when this pack of lies falls.
edit on 21-12-2010 by No Retreat No Surrender because: spelling

edit on 21-12-2010 by No Retreat No Surrender because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-12-2010 by No Retreat No Surrender because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2010 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by tortillawraps
Silverstein has always said he spoke with a fire commander on 911 and told him to pull building 7. However in actual fact he didn't speak to ANY fire chief.

Notice how when asked the name of the fire commander he spoke to, he simply says 'next question'. Doesn't even bother saying 'i don't remember his name' just next question, next question.

What other secrets just he have hmmm.

Preety sick what he did, so he doesn't mind being part of mass murder cuz he knew he was gonna get around 1 million dollars per person killed. Just look at him in that video and how defensive he becomes when questioned about 911. So obvious...


First. the title of this thread is entirely dishonest. Just because he didn't answer the question it doesn't mean he didn't talk to anyone from the fire department. It only means he knows full flipping well the person asking him the question was a truster that mindlessly believed everything Dylan Avery, Alex Jones, ect are shovelling out. The way the conspiracy zealots are going over every syllable he says with a fine tooth comb looking for hidden meanings that conceal sinister secret plots and conspiracies, of course he's going to keep mum. I've seen the almost quasi-religious devotion to these conspiracy stories you people have adopted with my own eyes so we both know you'll read vague admissions of guilt regardless of whether he said, "I talked to Joe Smith", "I dont remember his name" or "I like pie." He can't even say nothing at all without you people screaming GUILTY.

Second, look at the sick slanderous crap the OP is posting: "Preety sick what he did, so he doesn't mind being part of mass murder cuz he knew he was gonna get around 1 million dollars per person killed". This person is literally accusing Silverstein of mass murder entirely based upon the power of reading and misreading into, "pull it" as far as symantecs can possibly allow. The only thing obvious in all of this is that the OP is so much in love with the possibility there's some sinister conspiracy afoot that they WANT it to be true.

This isn't research to find the truth. It's a Rorshache test.




top topics



 
1

log in

join