HR 6550 - Legislation To End The Federal Reserve, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 132 times
Topic started on 19-12-2010 @ 10:35 PM by LazyGuy
I just came across a report which led me to an email posted in what looks like Google's web access to various newsgroups. Newsgroups was where it was at in the early days of the web and I guess is still important. The copied email looks to be from someone with the American Monetary Institute. There's also a link to a copy of the bill hosted on the House.Gov website.

Looks like there's more people than Ron Paul who are part of the system that realizes that the Federal Reserve system needs to be changed.

The following is a quote from the Google site.
On Friday December 17th Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D,Ohio, 10th District) took a crucial and heroic step to resolve our growing financial crisis and achieve a just and sustainable money system for our nation by introducing the National Emergency Employment Defense Act of 2010, abbreviated NEED. The bill number is HR6550.



I checked out the bill and from a quick scan I found this.
(12) The monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System have compounded the economic crisis by failing to take decisive action to move the economy forward, Wall Street which was bailed out by the American people is not investing its rising assets in Main Street


And this.
(18) The enactment of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 by Congress effectively delegated the sovereign power to create money, to the Federal Reserve system and private financial industry.
(19) This ceding of Constitutional power has contributed materially to a multitude of monetary and financial afflictions, including—
(A) growing and unreasonable concentration of wealth;
(B) unbridled expansion of national debt, both public and private;
(C) excessive reliance on taxation of citizens for raising public revenues;
(D) inflation of the currency;
(E) drastic increases in the cost of public infrastructure investments;
(F) record levels of unemployment and underemployment; and
(G) persistent erosion of the ability of Congress to exercise its Constitutional responsibilities to provide resources for the general welfare 2 of all the American people.


Here's a link to the Google site.
groups.google.com...

And one to the PDF file detailing the bill.
kucinich.house.gov...
edit on 19-12-2010 by LazyGuy because: Fixed URL for PDF
edit on 19-12-2010 by LazyGuy because: Changed Title & Changed Quotes Tags to External Content
edit on 19-12-2010 by LazyGuy because: Wording



reply posted on 19-12-2010 @ 11:09 PM by GirlGenius
reply to post by LazyGuy



Yes, no kidding! This is just what we NEED

Between this, and Ron Paul chairing the finance subcommittee, I have hope for the first time that we really may be able to turn this around.

The only caveat I have is that time Kucinich disappeared into that "secret meeting" with Obama. Anybody ever find out what that was all about? You know how they like to take over the opposing movements ... "if you can't beat 'em, lead 'em". That episode put a little question mark next to Dennis for me. Hopefully, he was just playing politics, but he looked a little smug ...


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 01:08 AM by whatukno
H.R. 6550:
To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic defense;


To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic defense; to provide for public investment in capital infrastructure; to provide for reducing the cost of public investment; to retire public debt; to stabilize the Social Security retirement system; to restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money, modernize and provide stability for the monetary system of the United States, retire public debt and reduce the cost of public investment, and for other public purposes.


These are always popular with the public, but rarely ever make it out of committee.


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 08:32 AM by LazyGuy
Originally posted by whatukno
H.R. 6550:
To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic defense;


To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic defense; to provide for public investment in capital infrastructure; to provide for reducing the cost of public investment; to retire public debt; to stabilize the Social Security retirement system; to restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money, modernize and provide stability for the monetary system of the United States, retire public debt and reduce the cost of public investment, and for other public purposes.


These are always popular with the public, but rarely ever make it out of committee.


EVERY one of their benefits of the bill points are very positive and exactly what this country needs.

They got all of the "Patriots" to vote for a bill that strips us of our rights.
What could be more patriotic than ACTUALLY fixing America?


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 08:57 AM by whatukno
reply to post by LazyGuy



Don't get me wrong, I am all for the idea of firing the Fed.

A private company who has this much power over our monetary policy is beyond illogical.

I am just giving you the reality of the situation, that's what happens to these bills, while they are indeed a good idea and I do support them, they rarely ever get out of committee.

Hell, if it were me, I would dump the Federal Reserve tomorrow. The US would mint it's own currency, and I would make it to that the Federal Reserve would be on the hook for our entire debt.

Can you imagine a private company on the hook for the entirety of the national debt? I mean I like the idea personally.

It sure as hell would improve the power of the dollar, all of a sudden, they would have no assets and owe the world a crapload of debt. Sure, it would completely destroy the world economy, and probably cause a 10 year long recession that would make the great depression look like a mild market adjustment.

But in the long long run, it would be better for the US and better for everyone.


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 09:00 AM by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by whatukno

Sounds good to me. 10 years of privation in order to get our country back? I am all for it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^