It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The U.S. government's main code-making and code-cracking agency now works on the assumption that foes may have pierced even the most sensitive national security computer networks under its guard.
"There's no such thing as 'secure' any more," Debora Plunkett of the National Security Agency said on Thursday amid U.S. anger and embarrassment over disclosure of sensitive diplomatic cables by the web site WikiLeaks.
But we should not be drawn into a conclusion as most of these reports leaked were not from secured terminals but rather from personnel who handles lest say "sensitive" information.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by tristar
But we should not be drawn into a conclusion as most of these reports leaked were not from secured terminals but rather from personnel who handles lest say "sensitive" information.
That's the point..These so called secret leaks were on a system that 500,000 people had clear access to..
Not exactly secret but enough to implement new, tough internet laws??
Probably...
similar to installing a burglar alarm in your home while having doors without locks.
Originally posted by Cyprian
Funny story. Once upon a time, a certain President wished to enact new, tougher "anti-terrorism" laws. Congress told him not a chance. Not long thereafter, there was a bomb scare at the Atlanta Airport. Hey presto, those new laws got passed in hurry - never mind that although ATL got "dumped" (emptied) and all flights were put on hold, there was never a bomb.
No...we haven't seen this WikiLeaks story before ever. Just saying.
"There's no such thing as 'secure' any more,"
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
reply to post by tristar
As if we were 'secure' before.
The disturbing part of this article to me was the NSA saying:
"There's no such thing as 'secure' any more,"
Sounds like they are disclaiming, in advance, any responsibility for anything that might happen.
At this point it is important to look at the difference between secrecy and privacy. The cables Assange collected were not secret, which is why they were so easy to collect on the Lady Gaga CD. Secrecy is acknowledged by both government and the public as dangerous, threatening accountability. The revised Freedom of Information Act marks the constantly shifting boundary between ourselves and our elected leaders. Those that have chosen to invoke JFK's speech on secrecy should note that his targets are secret societies and fascist regimes rather than the US diplomatic service which he held in high esteem.
Originally posted by Cyprian
Funny story. Once upon a time, a certain President wished to enact new, tougher "anti-terrorism" laws. Congress told him not a chance. Not long thereafter, there was a bomb scare at the Atlanta Airport. Hey presto, those new laws got passed in hurry - never mind that although ATL got "dumped" (emptied) and all flights were put on hold, there was never a bomb.
No...we haven't seen this WikiLeaks story before ever. Just saying.