It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Interview with DOE contractor about HAARP/Chemtrails!!! MUST HEAR!

page: 1
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   
Interesting look into HAARP Chemtrails from well qualified individual. All materials discussed available for download in links below.






Chemtrail EMP HAARP and more! (Including official unclassified documents e.g.Air Force line item budget) There is alot to learn in this download! Charts, Documents, Reading:

www.filedropper.com...

If you're having trouble downloading, try here: www.filefactory.com...
edit on 18-12-2010 by ReinkDuser because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:22 AM
link   
Wow. This looks like a breakthrough in terms of cracking the policy of denial linked to chemtrails.
A smoking gun?

Well spotted OP, and thanks for posting this.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   
reply to post by ReinkDuser
 


It's always been obvious they were spraying something..
What they are spraying is the big question..



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 12:33 AM
link   
Thank you for sharing these videos. S&F.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by ReinkDuser
 


It's always been obvious they were spraying something..
What they are spraying is the big question..


Did you listen to the videos?
second



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by wcitizen
 



Did you listen to the videos?


Not yet..Busy..
But I will later..



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 06:44 AM
link   
reply to post by wcitizen
 
No problem! Information is power.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by wcitizen
 



Did you listen to the videos?


Not yet..Busy..
But I will later..


Right, because they actually give details of what's in them.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ReinkDuser
 


Thank you for posting this vital information.

Scoutsniper



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 08:59 AM
link   
This is very interesting.
This appears to go a long way in confirming what we "delusional" chemtrailers have been saying for a while. Maybe soon "chemtrail" won't get the red squiggly line under it when it is typed, as it will be considered established fact.



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Let's not forget the NASA cloud chart updated this year to show 21 new cloud formations... More indoctrination. All 21 are chemtrail cloud formations, chemtrail/HAARP related.


edit on 19-12-2010 by ReinkDuser because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Stewie
 
I just got what your point was here... lol Anyhow, guess that would apply to alot of words, but we'd have to get govt. permission of course...



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 10:56 PM
link   
what utter twaddle - the idiots dont even know what a HT imageing sensor is



posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 11:07 PM
link   
Wow, some of you actually think cloud types were just now invented to cover up chemtrails??? Talk about believing anything you see on the internet. She sounds about as bad as crazy rainbow lady




posted on Dec, 20 2010 @ 06:00 AM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 
...then there are the idiots who simply cannot spell imaging.



posted on Dec, 31 2010 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Another shining example of what passes for expertise by the "chemtrail" theorists.
She had a clearance to make educational materials. She is not a chemist, meteorologist, aviation scientist, or military person, she made the programs to train people to do things.
So expertise comes by some kind of electronic osmosis? Really?
How about the funds were being spent to do what they say, and not projecting your (and her) paranoid musings of what each item might be able to be used for? The are not classified documents after all.
What a waste of time. It's like saying the person who prints the books knows all the information in that book.

An expert in the question of "chemtrails" should be an expert in a relevant field of study, i.e.: meteorologist, geologist, aviation engineers, chemists, climatologists, physics, etc.
An expert in these fields would not have gotten degree in Music Education or English as a Second Language.
. A technical writer does not have to understand what they are writing about.

Technical writing may be on any subject that requires explanation to a particular audience. A technical writer is not usually a subject matter expert (SME), but possesses and applies expertise to interview SMEs and conduct research necessary to produce accurate, comprehensive documents. Companies, governments, and other institutions typically hire technical writers not for expertise in a particular subject, but for expertise in technical writing, i.e., their ability to gather information, analyze subject and audience and produce clear documentation.

Source



posted on Jan, 1 2011 @ 09:00 AM
link   
reply to post by ReinkDuser
 


What a load! Have "chemtrailers" ever even tried to learn about clouds? This video is not the place to start. This person is just so wrong about everything it is LOL-able.
Presenting an important book, Cloud Studies. Here's the title page.


Please note the date of publication. This is not the first edition of the book either.
New clouds being added? I think not!



And the best "seer-e-o-cum-u-lus" example:



Here's the source so you can look, better still read about clouds yourself.
I know "chemtrail" believers will not do either, but I can try.
How do you answer images like these, taken around the time planes were first flying, before photos were taken on film? Yep, there is a whole chapter in this book describing the process he used to get the glass plates to show the subtle change of light needed to show details.
Or, rather, how do you debunk this book?
edit on 1-1-2011 by stars15k because: wrong photo, forgot to preview



posted on Jan, 1 2011 @ 12:18 PM
link   
I would love to put you in a debate with someone who is actually qualified to debate this topic. Just so I could watch your troll ass stutter for explanations.



posted on Jan, 1 2011 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Operations Manual 8.4.3.5:

1. CHEMICAL DISPATCH (CHEMTRAIL) Operations

1.1 CHEMICAL DISPENSER NORMAL PROCEDURES
1.2 CHEMICAL DISPENSER SHUTDOWN

2. CONDITIONAL PROCEDURES

(NOT APPLICABLE)

3. ABNORMAL PROCEDURES

3.1 CHEMICAL DISPENSER
3.2 CHEMICAL DISPENSER DOOR
3.3 CHEMICAL DISPENSER FUEL

4. LIMITATIONS AND DATA

For normal Chemtrail Operation refer to AOM 8.4.3.5.1.

For maximum wind components refer to AOM 8.4.3.5.2.

For minima applicable to dispatch with equipment unservicable refer to AOM 2.6.

Minima due to abnormal aircraft configuration are published in the respective ECL procedure.

----------------------------------------------------------​-----------------------------------

1.1 CHEMICAL DISPENSER NORMAL PROCEDURES

- CHEMICAL DISPENSER START (Air only)
- BAT P/B.............................................CFRM ON
- STANDBY POWER SELECTOR..............CHEM DISP
- CHEMICAL DISPENSER.......................START
- MIXTURE........................................... ..SET
- CHEMICAL DISPENSER Selector..........OFF

Dispatch requirements:

- 8 Full bottles (a 666 sq. km = 5328 sq. km)
- Check fluoride level in potable water is at least 4.5 %
- Refer to MEL 4.5 23-2

2. CONDITIONAL PROCEDURES

(Not Applicable)

3. ABNORMAL PROCEDURES

3.1 CHEM DISP

- This alert is Illuminati when:
- IQ selector is set to less than 23.

* CHEM DISP in ON position:

- CHEM DISP.............................................O FF
- MIXTURE SELECTOR................................DUMP

* Advise pax out of the blue that everything is in order.

CHEM DISP remains displayed

- No restart attempt should be made.

CHEM DISP no longer displayed

- CHEM DISP............................................ST ART
- Start attempts may be repeated
- Refer to Limitations and Systems data 2.4.4-4

Procedure completed

3.2 CHEM DISP DOOR

This alert is Illuminati when the CHEM DISP DOOR is not in the commanded position.

On ground:

- Contact NWO/MiB (VHF 151.51 or Grid number 51)

In air:

- Continue

Procedure completed.

**** Passenger discretion is advised ****

3.3 CHEMICAL DISPENSER FUEL

This alert is Illuminati when CHEMICAL DISPENSER Chemicals are low

- CHEM DISP SELECTOR..............................OFF
* No restart attempt should be made

- Refill as soon as possible. Diversions are optional, in concern with NWO Chemtrail Operations, Rachel, Nevada, USA.

Procedure completed.

4 LIMITATIONS AND SYSTEM DATA

- The CHEMICAL DISPENSER can be used in the air only.
- If Crosswind components at >FL100 exceed 15 kts operation is not advised.
- Bleed air can be supplied in air for 3 packs and in flight till 15000 ft press. altitude for 1 pack.
- Each CHEMICAL DISPENSER is supplied with 2 bottles; 1 bottle can be used for approx 666 sq. km.
- In case pax discretion is violated, advise Chemtrail Operations immediately and have pax diagnosed with any mental illness.
- If possible, a grid flightpath is to be followed. Air Traffic Control is obliged to cooperate. Extended flight times (delays) may be blamed on Air Traffic Control, Ground Employees and weather.
- It's the Commander's responsibility that Chemical Operations are done in accordance with the AOM, and within the time limits stated by the New World Order.
- When Chemical Operations are in progress, Bilderberg accomodation may be used during nightstops only.
edit on 1-1-2011 by firepilot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 


LOL!!!!


It's "Illuminati" when activated, (etc). Very funny one!!!


(I'm afraid the "chemmies" and most non-pilots may not get the creative humor, there.....nice try, though).

Oh, and "frequency 151.51" on VHF?! Priceless. Man, you could have a career as a typical "technical advisor" to any number of low-budget movies that claim to have "aviation experts"....well, to be fair, it's probable the Producer or Director who interfere....for "artistic" reasons, no matter how qualified the advisors are...in many cases.


(One reason I always loved the TRACON sequence, early in the opening of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind"....Spielberg used real air traffic controllers for the parts, and either more controllers, or real pilots for the "off-screen" voices of the "pilots". Everything, the terminology and tone and attitude ring true....):



Except, the frequency 122.5 (I still can't catch what the guy is saying, what type of airplane...for over thirty years, that's puzzled me). That freq sounds too close to a Flight Service Station freq, to me.....but the actor playing the "Air East 31" pilot is darn good......











edit on 1 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join