It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drkid
I am starting to ask this question myself after hearing what John Lear had to say.
Oh, one more thing. Does anyone else find it curious that Weed seems to have an awful lot of resources at his fingertips, or is it just me?
Originally posted by budaruskie
I want to know what you think about this video.
The only response I've ever gotten from a OS supporter about it is that it is a "red herring". It seems to me that the video was taken before WTC 1&2 came down because I don't see a massive amount of debris everywhere. Also, it shows very clearly that WTC 7 has fires on 1-2 floors, the windows appear to be blown out not in, and cars on the street outside are melted to steel. This could very well refute the entire OS of what happened with WTC 7 in less than 2 minutes. Anyway, what do you think?edit on 12/19/2010 by budaruskie because: uh huh
Originally posted by Cassius666
When the talk of explosives or the apprehended mossad agents comes up, then deniers are all over the thread.
However when a few people make posts of laserbeam satellites or no plane theories the deniers are absent. It is usually the people of the truther demografic who call those wild theories into question.
The 911 deniers mention them only when the talk turns to explosives again or eyewhitness accounts. Then they remind us that they read something about laserbeams somewhere and by that logic the NIST report is right and everybody else wrong.edit on 18-12-2010 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)
What I find far more distrurbing is the way those magic debries defenestrated WTC 7 and caused fires. You have 2 rows of a floor almost completely defenstrated, then you look up and all the windows are there, then again 2 rows of windows defenestrated with fires raging inside. If the damage was caused by falling debries I expect it to be more random. I am no statistician, but I would guess the cance for random debries to defenstrate the windows in the fashion we see it on the video ammounts to winning the lottery several times in a row.
Auto-exposure, the vertical spread of flames from windows below to windows above, is another way fire spreads throughout a type I building. Flames erupting out of a heat-shattered window can melt and break the glass window directly above. Once the window above is broken and falls away, flames can enter and ignite ceiling tile, curtains or furnishings. Even if the windows do not melt or break from heat, a small-concealed space between the exterior wall and the end of the floor slab can allow vertical spread of fire and smoke from floor to floor above and near a window.
Originally posted by amfirst
reply to post by Cassius666
Because most people are tired of debunking most conspiracy. It just goes in one ear and out of the other. Pointless talking to someone who will only believe what they want to believe and everyone else is a disinfo agent.