reply to post by downtown436
I guess you would be referring to these 4 quakes?
Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2010-12-18T06:55:27.000Z,36.37970,-106.74190,3.2000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-17T01:31:44.000Z,36.37540,-106.72250,3.0000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-17T01:31:07.000Z,36.39130,-106.73860,3.1000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-14T16:47:42.000Z,36.39860,-106.68210,2.9000,5.0000,New Mexico
Interesting that the
Smithsonian talks about a low velocity area under the
caldera, which would indicate molten rock perhaps.
Now it is also a fact that there are not that many quakes in the areas. This is the list for the past 365 days:
Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2010-12-18T06:55:27.000Z,36.37970,-106.74190,3.2000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-17T01:31:44.000Z,36.37540,-106.72250,3.0000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-17T01:31:07.000Z,36.39130,-106.73860,3.1000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-12-14T16:47:42.000Z,36.39860,-106.68210,2.9000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-10-15T02:41:58.000Z,34.39150,-107.77960,2.2000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-04-30T06:05:49.000Z,36.87170,-104.89040,2.8000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-04-08T09:36:58.000Z,36.86370,-104.80590,3.4000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-03-28T00:03:55.000Z,32.50410,-104.52710,4.1000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-02-21T09:55:39.000Z,32.50500,-104.61350,2.8000,5.0000,New Mexico
2010-01-18T08:41:08.000Z,36.86000,-104.72000,4.1000,5.0000,NEW MEXICO
2010-01-18T08:41:07.000Z,36.84230,-104.80150,3.8000,5.0000,New Mexico
The activity seems bunched in three areas
I don't really believe that 4 quakes over several days is anything to be concerned about at a caldera that has not seen an eruption for 50-60,000
years. Obviously because of the thermal springs it is not extinct, only dormant, but I think you would be seeing very considerably more activity if it
was about to awaken.