It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SKinLaB
I found myself starting to get upset a little bit over the past weeks about all of the negativity towards the U.S. BUT, instead of complaining about it i sucked it up and read a lot of the back and forth arguments that have been going on. I come to realize that it is posts like this that makes me understand why a lot of other Countries cannot tolerate some Americans attitudes. Its posts like this that make me ashamed that someone like you spews stuff out like this that represent this Country. I do not see the necessity for this. You are not helping our case bro. You are basically confirming why they look at us like ignorant arrogant pricks. Thanks man....
You are on your own....
Originally posted by SKinLaB
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
You are not helping our case bro. You are basically confirming why they look at us like ignorant arrogant pricks. Thanks man....
You are on your own....
Originally posted by SKinLaB
...
Its posts like this that make me ashamed that someone like you spews stuff out like this that represent this Country. I do not see the necessity for this. You are not helping our case bro. You are basically confirming why they look at us like ignorant arrogant pricks. Thanks man....
You are on your own....
If you had read a bit more of the thread you would also know that I believe that it is justifiable to restrict mans natural rights
Originally posted by tribewilder
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Haven't people like you learned by now that banning firearms increase crimes, and even crimes with firearms increase because only criminals have guns when they are banned?...
Could you please show me where you get this information from? I do believe that you are quite mistaken in this.
thanks...
Police’s Specialist Black Gun Crime Unit Faces Disbandment as Shootings Continue
Tue, 23/11/2010 - 16:37 | BNP News
...
The Yard figures showed that shooting incidents in London during 2009 were nearly double that of the previous year, statistics which led the far left extremist Guardian newspaper to admit that “gun crime in some areas is out of control.”
There was a 17 percent rise in overall firearms offences and the number of shootings almost doubled from 123 to 236 in the last six months of 2009, compared with the same period the previous year, a rise of 91.8 percent.
Serious firearms offences have risen by 47 percent across the capital. According to Metropolitan police chief, Sir Paul Stephenson, those discharging the firearms and those being shot at are young teenagers involved in "respect shootings" to settle petty disputes with little thought of the consequences.
The Guardian went on to admit that the number of incidents reported is only a fraction of what is taking place.
"Gun crime has never gone away," the paper quoted the Rev Les Isaac from south London, as saying. "Firearms are being discharged more or less on a daily basis in some parts of London."
He added: "Those using the guns have got younger. These children are unpredictable, they have access to guns and they are willing to use them."
...
The most violent country in Europe: Britain is also worse than South Africa and U.S.
By James Slack
Last updated at 12:14 AM on 3rd July 2009
Britain's violent crime record is worse than any other country in the European union, it has been revealed.
Official crime figures show the UK also has a worse rate for all types of violence than the U.S. and even South Africa - widely considered one of the worlds most dangerous countries.
The figures comes on the day new Home Secretary Alan Johnson makes his first major speech on crime, promising to be tough on loutish behaviour.
The Tories said Labour had presided over a decade of spiralling violence.
In the decade following the partys election in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks soared by 77 per cent to 1.158million - or more than two every minute.
The figures, compiled from reports released by the European Commission and United Nations, also show:
The UK has the second highest overall crime rate in the EU.
It has a higher homicide rate than most of our western European neighbours, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
The UK has the fifth highest robbery rate in the EU.
It has the fourth highest burglary rate and the highest absolute number of burglaries in the EU, with double the number of offences than recorded in Germany and France.
But it is the naming of Britain as the most violent country in the EU that is most shocking. The analysis is based on the number of crimes per 100,000 residents.
In the UK, there are 2,034 offences per 100,000 people, way ahead of second-placed Austria with a rate of 1,677.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ec48b7553e41.jpg[/atsimg]
The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 92 and South Africa 1,609.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling said: 'This is a damning indictment of this government's comprehensive failure over more than a decade to tackle the deep rooted social problems in our society, and the knock on effect on crime and anti-social behaviour.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
...
If you had read a bit more of the thread you would also know that I believe that it is justifiable to restrict mans natural rights.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
I don’t have a problem with our freedom of speech being restricted, indeed if you had read a little further into that thread you would have found a link to my other thread about freedom of speech and how I think it is a lie and further to this think it is a good thing to legislate freedom of speech.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
The same really applies to freedom of the press, there are some things that are not in the public interest or adversely affect national security and as such should not be reported.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
Same goes for market freedom, I am a socialist so don’t really have a problem with getting rid of that one.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
So if your question is along the lines of “if you take our second amendment, you have to give up your right to freedom of speech”, based directly on my thread. Then the answer would have to be yes, yes i would because I think absolute freedom feeds moral corruption within society and also because I think its already happening, as it should.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
Again i have to stress this is only my opinion, it does not represent anyone else.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
Have you ever even lived for a few years in an area of Europe or Australia? I'm not talking about a petty tourist trip, i'm talking about actually settling down somewhere for a while paying rent and such? Have you?
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
I think you are basing your idea that guns should be widespread and legal on a naive perception that more guns = less crime.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
I am aware that criminals acquire weaponry in an illegal manner, I don't think YOU understand though, that if weapons are legally acquired more easily, the quantity of criminals carrying weapons will increase as most won't have to turn to illegally acquired weapons.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
Here in Australia it is legal to own rifles like the Mosin-Nagant and similar. Now let's say concealed carry pistols were legal. Do you really think that will decrease crime? It will increase death rates due to civilians thinking they are the # and trying to play hero, getting everyone killed in a situation that could have been defused merely by abiding by the assailants demands. Weapons + Untrained Civilians = not a good result.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
And don't give me that "they can go to the range" crap, that is just that, target practice. If you # up in the slightest with a pistol, you can get people killed that shouldn't have been. Civilians are not mature enough to own concealable carry weaponry.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
You want an M4A1 in your house? That's fine. Having that there is good insurance in the case that your government oppresses you. But owning a semi-automatic pistol is a different story.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
I am completely ignoring the possibility that a gun-crazed lunatic will carry his M4A1 to the roof-top of some building and pop some civies.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
Weapons. Guns. They are instruments of death. They are not tools for self-defense. Their purpose is to kill. Using it as self-defense will get you killed.
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
If someone wants to hurt you with a weapon, you don't think they will try and take your ability to use it away from you?
Originally posted by Somehumanbeing
The best thing you can do as a civilian in an armed robbery is give the #er what he wants, trying to play war-hero will only get you in #.edit on 19-12-2010 by Somehumanbeing because: (no reason given)
Still remains that Canada or England can double their crime rate and they do not even come close to the numbers of some US cities.
I lived for 9 years mostly in Spain and in Portugal... I have seen crime in Europe, and several times was almost a victim of crime in Spain.
BTW, yes citizens having their right to bear arms unrestricted does equal to less crime, and sorry to tell you that the UK crime problem shows this.
EVER since handguns were banned in the UK there have been MORE crimes and even MORE crimes with handguns
People who have firearms have to learn how to use them...
BTW, it is obvious by now that you don't know anything about firearms,
Tell that to the women, children, disabled and elderly people who have saved themselves by using a firearm... Tell that to the people who have gained their freedom by the use of firearms... Tell that to the husbands, fathers, brothers, mothers, sisters, or other family members who saved their loved ones from criminals by using a weapon... More people are saved by handguns in the hands of good civilians than crimes are committed with legal firearms...
The problem is that the U.S. media loves to show mostly crimes with firearm but they almost never show when law abiding citizens stop crimes, except maybe Fox News.
I would think it would be kind of hard for the criminal to take anyone's weapon away with their body full of lead... but if you beleive in zombies I guess you could be right
BTW, did it EVER cross your mind that there could be people out there that would not be so willing as you seem to want to be raped, or murdered?...
You do know that criminals also do rape and murder just for fun right?... and anyway why in the world should anyone have to give their well earned money, or other possessions to a criminal?... and please, don't give us that crap about, "oh, but you can get money, and other material possessions again, but not your life"... even people with firearms know not to try to get their weapons when they got another firearm right at their face, or on their back...
Owning firearms doesn't equal to being the "dumbest kid in the block"...
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
IMHO all three of you are right, but I am trying to force those Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and others who beleive that guns must be banned to use the brain they were born with because imo they haven't used it for a while now since they have allowed themselves to become brainwashed by the rich elites so many of them claim they want to fight against.