Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by hooper
Nice side-stepping all my questions, hooper.
You're a real pro at that!
That debris wouldnt have been in the hole that was dug.
They treated this as a crime scene...see above video I posted.
They wouldnt have went through what was being dug up to then dispose of pieces. They would have transported everything to a lab, where it was then combed through with a fine comb.
They supposedly found bone fragments (slivers) that they tested DNA through.
They sure wouldnt have disposed of possible slivers in the same container as metal and such.
They wouldnt have went through what was being dug up to then dispose of pieces. They would have transported everything to a lab, where it was then combed through with a fine comb.
reply to post by ATH911
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because hauling all that dirt away along with the excavated debris and having to separate and dispose the dirt at your facility, instead of conveniently separating it and burying the dirt back at the field you dug it out of, is real cost effective.
Huh?
duh ...Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
Didn't you admit that they probably would not have just thrown all the remains in one big pile so that you can see it in an aerial photo?
Please post the official government report that precisely delineates between airplane debris recovered from embeddment site and the material that was not. Been waiting.
Please elaborate on the rigourous training the Ambassadors recieved
Then what % of a 757 do you see lying on top of the ground in all the photos before the cleanup started?
71.6543568932%
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by DIDtm
Not according to ATH911, they should have just been throwing everything into one big pile so he could see it later on in the aerial photos.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by DIDtm
They wouldnt have went through what was being dug up to then dispose of pieces. They would have transported everything to a lab, where it was then combed through with a fine comb.
Not according to ATH911, they should have just been throwing everything into one big pile so he could see it later on in the aerial photos.
Your scenario:
- After processing each scoop, they hauled away tons and tons of plane debris, you just couldn't tell.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by DIDtm
Not according to ATH911, they should have just been throwing everything into one big pile so he could see it later on in the aerial photos.
hooper, stop lying.
No...post after post you either ignore his point or dont comprehend it.
He is stating that if in fact 90%+ of the plane was dug up from being buried...
as claimed by the 9/11 report,
then there would be much more debris in that dumpster (if in fact you side with fellow trusters like Judge) that that particular bin contained debris that was dug up.
Because after all, according to the report, the plane DID NOT disintegrate (which fellow trusters believe it did) and they did in fact, find 90% of the plane.
You see...us truthers as you call us, only have questions.
We often have different questions.
Like some of you claim the plane in PA disintegrated, while others claim that it buried itself and was dug it up. But none of you offer logical answers as to why there was 2 different crash sites miles apart, and luggage was found scattered for miles.
None of you can answer why no fires or smoke were seen by news crews and reported on, when a PLANE CRASHED.
None of you can answer how a plane can bury itself. 90% of it.
None of you can answer where the wing imprints are on the ground from crashing...for those that dont believe it disintegrated.
Instead, there is debate of what debris filled up a garbage bin....where it came from.
Was it dug up or was it collected from around the crash
No...post after post you either ignore his point or dont comprehend it.
He is stating that if in fact 90%+ of the plane was dug up from being buried...
Yes it's humorous because the official story says 95% of Flight 93 was recovered and most of that recovered debris was supposedly hidden in the ground, so if tons of plane debris *didn't* come out of that ground, then that means the official claim that 95% of the plane was recovered was a lie. Don't you agree?
then there would be much more debris in that dumpster (if in fact you side with fellow trusters like Judge) that that particular bin contained debris that was dug up.
Because after all, according to the report, the plane DID NOT disintegrate (which fellow trusters believe it did) and they did in fact, find 90% of the plane.
You see...us truthers as you call us, only have questions.
We often have different questions.
Like some of you claim the plane in PA disintegrated, while others claim that it buried itself and was dug it up. But none of you offer logical answers as to why there was 2 different crash sites miles apart, and luggage was found scattered for miles.
None of you can answer why no fires or smoke were seen by news crews and reported on, when a PLANE CRASHED.
None of you can answer how a plane can bury itself. 90% of it.
None of you can answer where the wing imprints are on the ground from crashing...for those that dont believe it disintegrated.
