Women, they are the ones the NWO are trying to depopulate secretly and have been doing forever.

reply to post by ThinkingCap


Listen, the original post was stupid. I still get a little chuckle thinking he was being ironic, although I do find that highly unlikely.

I'll lay out a view, really concise and straightforward. Misogynists quoted Freud. Early feminists flipped Freud. Modern-day feminists who still flip Freud are detestable (although I think the counter was necessary originally). And the idea that women are somehow less arrogant than men is laughable and extremely stereotypical nonsense. Arrogant aholes seek to fill a power vacuum, both men and women. I think this is the time in history when we prove that many powerful men AND women are full of it. Then, the men and women under them, being conned and placated and lied to and marginalized will rise up in a true movement, the movement to put descent people in power regardless of gender or race. Thank you for your time.

Edit: And there is at least one valid idea regarding feminism and a so-called NWO. Governments can change and create more rules and regulations, and women being so newly in a visible position of power in which they too are awarded money and yellow smiley face stickers, will probably more easily acquiesce to a transition. After all, although maybe not directly viewed that way, it can have the effect of a sort-of bribe. And I am certainly not saying that men are not victim to this mentality as well. It is just that with the collective mass of women in fresh power, there is going to inevitably be a tendency to get while the gettings good, ride the waves of the system, and to hell with the consequences. Any freshly victorious group of any gender or race or religion has the same tendency. It is HUMAN nature.

reply to post by Xavialune


I am not denying the possibility of this. And there were certainly a few matriarchal societies. Heck, the Native Americans, even though the chief was male, had a somewhat matriarchal perspective. But what you are saying is often repeated many times with no evidence. Meme fodder. Is that what "education" now is, spreading ideas until they stick in the interest of one's own world view, regardless of fact. Seems like we want to live in Disney world. This is all fine and dandy until fantasy strays too far from reality. Besides, the concept of trey-archies is about power anyway. The third side of a coin. That thing that is birthed from two opposite concepts. The treyarchies, both pa and ma, are all about control. Plus, and I will leave it at this, there are many hidden influences throughout history that are not often considered.

reply to post by c0ldPhr34k


I'm not sure I agree with even half of what you said, OP, but I admire your boldness. S & F.

reply to post by c0ldPhr34k


There certainly is a homo-sexual agenda promoted by all the single-sex societies - Masonic, Islamic, Catholic priesthood and other brother and sisterhoods. Those who chose to belong to a society (note I said "chose" because some are forced and some work for such an agenda in a mercenary capacity) where only one sex is allowed are undoubtedly homosexual and want to extend this environment to the entire globe and beyond.

It's extraordinary that such societies get away with professing not to be homosexual, such as the Roman Catholic priesthood and Freemasonry. The reason why they get away with it is because they control the media.

I'll tell you why they want to do it. They want to dumb out all differences in society including sexual ones. A hideous male-based creature that can get pregnant has already been genetically engineeered. I have termed their agenda homo-socialism. They want to do it, but be content when I assure you that there is some-one more powerful than all these societies put together who is not going to permit it.