It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Ghost374
They should have the limit set to a point where there can be no doubt just by talking and looking at the guy that he is totally smashed.
Originally posted by Schaden
Originally posted by Seitler
The same could be said about letting a person own a gun! If no one owned a firearm, then no one could be killed by gun fire.
But drunk driving is inherently dangerous to others. It's not some remote chance.
It's like you are saying someone should be able to stand out in the middle of the street and fire their gun at random. Just as long as they don't hit anybody, no crime was committed.
I think the govt should let people do whatever stupid and foolish things they want, as long as they don't hurt other people. Driving drunk is an unacceptable risk to other people. Just as often, the drunk hurts or kills other people, along with themselves, ergo drunk driving is illegal. Our society agrees with that.
Drunk driving laws are draconian, do nothing to eliminate drunk driving and are completely class warfare. For the rich $50k is a drop in the bucket. For the working stiff, it can be a death sentence cause many jobs have been lost due to the mark on a record.
When someone does something reckless that causes someone else injury, you punish them. You do not punish everyone that does SOMETHING that MAY cause harm.
Originally posted by Maslo
Yes, you do. Endangering other peoples lives should be a crime, even if nothing bad happens.
You just choose to not see all of them and criminalize others that do not think "LIKE YOU"
So we should ban driving too? That endangers alot of people - just look at the stats. It is a goddamn bloodbath on the highways. I had a grandson get hit by a car! I'm arguing from emotion. Agree with me.
Originally posted by Maslo
Normal driving is extremely useful for the society, drunk driving is not at all. Thats why normal driving is not banned.
It sounds like you are putting a price on human life. How much is one of your children worth?
And what about the environment. Forcing people who don't work for the government to use public transportation would reduce carbon emissions and reduce the horrible deprivations caused by global warming.
Originally posted by nowhere2hide
I hate the cops as much as the next guy, but this is one they got right.
Originally posted by zarp3333
Drunk driving laws are draconian, do nothing to eliminate drunk driving and are completely class warfare. For the rich $50k is a drop in the bucket. For the working stiff, it can be a death sentence cause many jobs have been lost due to the mark on a record.