Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by Arken
. Scientists have been promissing Fusion Power is just a years away. In all this time not to mention money, Fusion Power has not even Powered a Single
Most scientists are looking in the wrong direction because of the flawed models they have been given. Don’t blame them; look at the system that
continues to teach outdated information. For example; there are recent scientific observations concerning planetary formation, solar fusion and even
oil formation which can only be explained with cold fusion science and alternative models. Unfortunately, the scientific establishment labels cold
fusion and alternative models as fringe science, to be ignored. They will stick to their dogma till the bitter end.
In the interest of adding to this discussion here is a brief summary. Feel free to ask questions if you need me to elaborate on any specific topic.
1.) Standard Sun Model
According to the standard Sun model; it has a core of mostly hydrogen and helium which was formed by gravitational collapse. The core is the hottest
area due to hot fusion.
Recent satellite observation shows an abundance of iron and cooler temperatures as we explore deeper.
Basic physics tells us we should expect the majority of iron to accumulate towards the core due to the Sun’s powerful gravity. We have also
observed fissures, persistent surface features and global rotation that is indicative of a uniform body. These are not characteristic of a body with a
chaotic fusion core.
There is an alternative model such as the Birkeland Sun which adequately explains recent observations. We should also reasonably expect cold fusion
reactions among its surface since the high gravitational/pressure environment supports it. (Molten iron-nickel-sulfur lattice confines hydrogen atoms)
This topic should interest ufologists since there are cases where crafts have left behind molten metal and smell like rotten eggs (or
hydrogen-sulfide). Since the most practical and portable form of hydrogen is water, we should also consider water related cases. Events involving
suctioning of large amounts of water may be for deuterium (heavy water) extraction, an important ingredient for fusion.
2.) Earth & Planetary Expansion
There is evidence that suggests planetary expansion which contradicts Pangea. The expansion model solves the enigma as to how dinosaurs and plant life
were able to grow so large (more mass = more gravity). If the model is right, and I believe it is, then Earth will need a constant source of matter to
explain the addition of mass (resulting in increased gravity). I suspect underwater volcanoes are absorbing hydrogen atoms from the ocean and the
oceans are being replenished from space. Is it any coincidence that large exoplanets like GJ 1214b are covered in water?
Another interesting consequence to consider is the possibility of a planet reaching the mass necessary to initiate surface fusion. Scientists still
can’t explain Jupiter’s anomalous heat and billions of years from now it may very well become a Star. It should only take ~15% increase of mass
to accomplish sustained fusion. The fact that we haven’t found a planet larger than the smallest star further supports this hypothesis. All large
bodies in space may very well undergo the same transformation phases when the conditions are present.
3.) Abiogenic (or Abiotic) Oil
With an expanding Earth model we should expect a byproduct of cold fusion such as carbon deposits to be present. This eliminates the need for plants
or animals in the formation of oil/gas.