reply to post by c0ldPhr34k
When people go on about so called 'overpopulation' and unsustainable populations, what they are *really* saying is '*economically* sustainable
populations'
It all comes down (again) to money and wealth being more important to those that have it, than human life is.
Our world, has plenty of water, plenty of empty land, plenty of natural resources.
There is only a threat to profits, not to the survivability of our world. In other words, a human population of double what we have now, is easily
manageable, BUT it would take investment in energy, alternative farming methods such as high rise farming, multi tiered terraces, combined floating
offshore agriculture and energy production farms, solar desalination plants and so on.
The way to support, and easily support many more people than we have now is simple to achieve, although initially it would not be cheap financially to
set up.
The way or how, is there, it's just that the will isn't.
'Overpopulation' is a myth which relates primarily to less profits due to the required addition investment. It doesn't mean 'Oh no! We are all
going to starve and run out of room to live'. We won't.