I would go for people that are not contributing to the wellbeing of the planet. Like the OP said, start at the top. Every elite out there would have
to go. Clean house. Since there are such few at the top, I'd go ahead and get rid of people in densely populated cities in every continent to keep
diversity. I'd rather get rid of people living on coastal regions since ocean levels would rise anyway. This would force people to move away from the
coast and seek higher ground. Racial background, religion or beliefs would not be a factor in determining who stays and who goes. Mostly geographical
and the evil elite.
Well , they should start in the Hamptons , then swing on over to Martha's Vineyard on their next stop to Washington then L.A. . Cleaning up the
Earth's Useless Eaters in those Areas would work out fine don't you think ?........
The world doesn't actually need depopulation this is a myth and a BS excuse for control through death. What the world needs is people in charge who
aren't corrupt and can make real worthwhile change. For any continent on earth to be starving is simply unacceptable. Mega hanging gardens and
aquaponics systems alone would solve world hunger.
You can always tell how free a world is by it's prosperity
edit on 16-4-2011 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)