It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Nutter
Instead of complaining about the medium; how about addressing the fact that the NYPD helicopter reported the buckling columns prior to collapse ?
its not a one liner its a genuine question. If uv no desire to answer the op question why bother?im not gunna prove anything to ou i this thread as this would be off topic. Theres hundreds of threads onthis forum that proves the towers were not brought down by fire
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by kaya82
do what the op asks prove it was caused by fire and planes instead of bitching makes you look silly
I have a better idea ... You prove that it wasn't caused by fire and planes . That's how this works see , you are the accuser , therefore the burden of proof is on you .
And stop posting sarcastic one-liners , it makes you look silly . And immature .
According to Shyam-Sunder, the concave bowing of the steel was seen on the sides of the towers opposite where the planes hit them. At 10:06 a.m. that morning, an officer in a police helicopter reported that ``it's not going to take long before the north tower comes down.'' This was 20 minutes before it collapsed. In another radio transmission at 10:21 a.m., the officer said he saw buckling in the north tower's southern face, Shyam-Sunder said.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Please dont debate on here, leave this thread to the 911 deniers to piece toegether their version of the accounts on why the towers fell.
Theres hundreds of threads onthis forum that proves the towers were not brought down by fire
NYPD Police Radio Transmissions on 9/11 Discuss Truck Bomb Between 6th and 7th on Kings Street
In under an hour after it was attacked, the south tower would fall.
"We tried to get the message across that the writing is on the wall -- the north tower is probably going to come down," Semendinger recalled. "Everybody should get out."
Thirty minutes later, it also collapsed.
Please dont debate on here, leave this thread to the 911 deniers to piece toegether their version of the accounts on why the towers fell.
Originally posted by okbmd
the obvious, that two planes hit two skyscrapers and then three skyscrapers were completely destroyed to the ground
That is it in a nutshell . Now , was that so hard to admit ?
Planes hit the towers , towers collapsed as a result of the damage incurred from the impacts and the subsequent fires .
Originally posted by Alfie1
Instead of complaining about the medium; how about addressing the fact that the NYPD helicopter reported the buckling columns prior to collapse ?
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by getreadyalready
Scripting? Days in advance?
The BBC said got the story that WTC 7 had collapsed from Reuters who said that it came from a local source
by early afternoon was known that WTC 7 was in danger of collapse, this was confirmed when FDNY established
collapse zone around building and cleared the area around .
In all the confusion that date it got garbled . Story was released without first confirming it
Why do truthers want to concoct elaborate conspiracy fantasy.....