It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
LONDON —
Julian Assange will be freed on bail from a British jail, a U.K. judge ruled Thursday, rejecting an appeal by prosecutors to keep the WikiLeaks founder in prison as he fights an extradition request by Sweden.
Cheers erupted outside the London court as the verdict by High Court justice Duncan Ouseley was reported. The judge then outlined the bail conditions to Assange in a packed courtroom full of lawyers, journalists and supporters
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
Both Sweden and Britain are denying Appealing against his bail.
Evan assanges lawyer doesnt know who orderd the appeal against his bail.
Strange.edit on 16-12-2010 by ThePeopleParty because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
Both Sweden and Britain are denying Appealing against his bail.
Evan assanges lawyer doesnt know who orderd the appeal against his bail.
Strange.edit on 16-12-2010 by ThePeopleParty because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
Both Sweden and Britain are denying Appealing against his bail.
Evan assanges lawyer doesnt know who orderd the appeal against his bail.
Strange.edit on 16-12-2010 by ThePeopleParty because: (no reason given)
Strange indeed.
Certainly an appeal request MUST had been recorded by the Courts.
So WHO made that appeal? Will this be our chance to see WHO are the puppet masters FINALLY, whom had much to hide and need Julian safe in a locker, should the supposed 'independent' and 'impartial' judiciary comes clean??.
Originally posted by justwokeup
reply to post by wcitizen
As far as I understand it it has to be the CPS. Nobody else can actually appeal against bail. The point is why they felt they needed to do so, when the country seeking extradition is officially 'not bothered'? Thats where the dirt is.
Time for a freedom of information request on correspondences between the Swedish Judiciary and the CPS? It would of course fail, but be mildly amusing :-)