To be or not to be...........a slave.

I give you this, a question of slavery.

It's the end of the world.

t's the end of the World

As we know it, but I feel fine. Private property and private responsibility for one's actions are no longer relevant. As Samuel Adams said "Among the Natural Rights of the Colonists are these First. a Right to Life; Secondly to Liberty; thirdly to Property; together with the Right to support and defend them in the best manner they can-Those are evident Branches of, rather than deductions from the Duty of Self Preservation, commonly called the first Law of Nature."

Private property is what seperates a free man from a slave. The RIGHT to have and to hold property. What is property one must ask? Property as expressed by Noel Webster would be " In 1787-89 Webster was an outspoken supporter of the new Constitution. In terms of political theory, he deemphasized virtue (a core value of republicanism) and emphasized widespread ownership of property (a key element of liberalism). He was one of the few Americans who paid much attention to the French theorist Jean Jacques Rousseau." Sited

One must ask one self, if one cannot hold or own property, is one a slave or a serf? ""Just and true liberty, equal and impartial liberty," in matters spiritual and temporal, is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to by the eternal and immutable laws of God and nature, as well as by the law of nations and all well-grounded municipal laws, which must have their foundation in the former." Sited

One seperates us from them, the slaves, the serfs of yesteryear? Is it the ability to own property? Are we able to own property in and of itself? Ask yourself this, if you are required to pay property tax of 5% per year, does it not take the government 20 years to steal your property? Do you slave to the government to variably hold your very rights as a human being? From the day you are born, are you not held in bondage to a debt of their making?

Never in the history of man has there been such an enslavement. Even in the history of the United States, where history of slavery and indentured servitude has such a blight on humanity, been perpetrated on so many, with only the knowledge of the few.

Tell me, what is YOUR penance to live in society? Is it a %10 tithe? 20%? 30% 75%? What is your nature of enslavement to your government? Do you even know? Of course not, why would the government provide an easy answer. They would not, they would be subversive in their endeavors to hide their slavery. They would hide it from prying eyes as much as possible. The largest taxation would not even be fathomable, it would be invisible. Hence the creation of the fiat currency system, whereby a secretive tax, known as inflation would be introduced. Whereby a hidden but most intrusive taxation would be construed by the most devious of minds would be introduced. A tax so destructive but yet so subtle that one would not know the vastness of it. Whereby the very nature of the value of the currency we use, to devalue as we hold it, day by day would be the nature of their destruction.

We squabble over the percentage of our enslavement. We argue whether or not the "supposed" rich will be taxed at a percentage of their worth as if they were property. In the past they would have called this for what it ACTUALLY is...........slavery to the state. If one produces wealth or property by one's labor, is it ACTUALLY income as defined in the beginning of our country? IT IS NOT! Income was defined by the founders as the PROFIT one derived by the implementation of capital. In other words, the profit made by investment of capital, not the value of one's labor. So the bankers have taken to another form of taxation to rid THEMSELVES of the entrapments of usury that they were so despised of in the past. They use the classic tale of class warfare to ply their trade. They ask YOU to question, at what percentage should be the tax of the "supposed" rich. They ask the populace to ply their trade of subterfuge and YOU fall for it.

Such lunacy would never have happened years ago. One must ask themselves, but by what right or privelage does the government have the obligation to enslave it's own populace? Is it to further the freedom of it's populace? Is it to further the freedom that we all so desire? Or is it about control? Pure and simple.

You be the judge, jury and executioner for I will no longer be the slave they want me to be.


Forgot to add-

You have to go to the link to get the links I guess. For some reason the comments remove the links.