It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nventual
What do you mean by "getting the pictures developed"? You took them with a film camera? They look digital to me.
BTW it isn't just pixelation around the UFO, it's blatantly a perfect square of pixelation. It looks like you simply cut out the object with a square cut tool instead of putting the effort in to manually cut the object itself.
Try harder next time, especially when there's a risk of ban.edit on 16/12/10 by Nventual because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Nventual
What do you mean by "getting the pictures developed"? You took them with a film camera? They look digital to me.
BTW it isn't just pixelation around the UFO, it's blatantly a perfect square of pixelation. It looks like you simply cut out the object with a square cut tool instead of putting the effort in to manually cut the object itself.
Try harder next time, especially when there's a risk of ban.edit on 16/12/10 by Nventual because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wally Hope
I'm no expert but something raises a red flag when I see pixelation and straight lines around an object that doesn't match the background...
Makes it look like it was added to the image.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
God, give it a rest, the square pixelation around the object it's perfectly normal for a JPEG compressed image and it does not mean it's a pasted object.
So unless the people at Wal-Mart did when I went there to pick them up after they were developed, then I dunno what else to tell you.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
I'm no expert but something raises a red flag when I see pixelation and straight lines around an object that doesn't match the background...
Makes it look like it was added to the image.
Originally posted by Nventual
What do you mean by "getting the pictures developed"? You took them with a film camera? They look digital to me.
BTW it isn't just pixelation around the UFO, it's blatantly a perfect square of pixelation. It looks like you simply cut out the object with a square cut tool instead of putting the effort in to manually cut the object itself.
Try harder next time, especially when there's a risk of ban.edit on 16/12/10 by Nventual because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
God, give it a rest, the square pixelation around the object it's perfectly normal for a JPEG compressed image and it does not mean it's a pasted object.
That's what's odd..The OP states it was film...
Pixelation in film???
So unless the people at Wal-Mart did when I went there to pick them up after they were developed, then I dunno what else to tell you.
Originally posted by -Blackout-
Anyhow, as I got the pictures developed, in one of them I notice this "thing" in the sky. I really have no idea what it is. Hopefully someone here can perhaps tell me what it is in this picture. [...] And also, at the time of taking the picture, I did not notice anything in the sky.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
I'm no expert but something raises a red flag when I see pixelation and straight lines around an object that doesn't match the background...
Makes it look like it was added to the image.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
Unless you can explain how the pixelation around the object ends in a square of straight lines then I say it is a fake.
That is an obvious sign that the object was added to the image.