posted on Dec, 15 2010 @ 03:11 AM
Well here's what it all boils down to isn't it?
WikiLeaks "criminally" published contraband information that was criminally obtained. Because of the method of obtainment, this makes WL an
accessory to crime. Why should they expect Constitutional Guarantees when in reality they have no right to claim American Rights because they're not
even citizens of this country? Does the American Constitution grant it's freedoms and rights to Australians now?
On the flip side, WL has exposed serious criminal activities being performed by American Legislators and Service Men and Women in Iraq, Cuba, and
Afghanistan that have been hidden from us under the pretense of 'National Security" that every morally honest person must admit would not be
tolerated. Doesn't the American Constitution preside over legality in this Country any longer?
A catch 22 has arisen, which merits justification AND condemnation of all involved. Do criminal secrets merit legal protections? Do illegal actions
deserve freedom from justice?
Should a CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED RIGHT be broadsided by biased embarrassment and founded fears? Should Americans address the actions of our
elected officers, making them accountable under law?
Should we allow them to hedge themselves further by letting them pass 11th hour legislation directed against the Freedom of Press, Freedom of Speech,
and the RIGHT America possesses to be told THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH - SO HELP US GOD?
I leave the floor of debate open at this time...