Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Astronomers Find First Evidence Of Other Universes

page: 1
64
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+20 more 
posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   






posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   





posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:34 PM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


Parallel Universes, and unlimited number of Universes exist in theory.

Time to move along and find solid ground working evidence to support these theories.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:36 PM
link   
I love stuff like this.
And it's one of my strong beliefs that there are multiple universe. It just feels right for some reason.
Just a gut feeling I guess.
I would be pretty amazing if they could prove it within our lifetime.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Yep that gut feeling is shared by a mess of people.
Its all a matter of perception though, isnt it?
One guy sees cycles of the big bang, amd the next guy sees bruised spots on the skin of our universe...yeesh!
I love thiis %^it!



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by RUSSO

these circles should either spring into clear view or disappear into noise (rather like the mysterious Mars face that appeared in pictures of the red planet taken by Viking 1 and then disappeared in the higher resolution


They picked a good example, we all know how real the face on Mars turned out to be.

This will turn out to be just as real, is my guess (meaning, not at all).

There may be other universes, I just don't think they'll find them by looking at CMBR.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


Can't Penrose stop making the rest of us look bad? He's already established himself as one of the if not the smartest man in the world and here he is changing the world once again.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


Apart from parallel or different dimensions, I thought the universe was everything..
If there's more doesn't that just mean THE universe is bigger than they thought, not another one?????


Definitions of universe on the Web:

* everything that exists anywhere;

www.google.com.au...:universe&sa=X&ei=vkkITZ6JPIOnrAet0YTVDg&ved=0CBUQkAE
edit on 14-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 10:57 PM
link   
If only I could prove it! But my belief is their are planet's for EVERY star.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arbitrageur

Originally posted by RUSSO

these circles should either spring into clear view or disappear into noise (rather like the mysterious Mars face that appeared in pictures of the red planet taken by Viking 1 and then disappeared in the higher resolution


They picked a good example, we all know how real the face on Mars turned out to be.

This will turn out to be just as real, is my guess (meaning, not at all).

There may be other universes, I just don't think they'll find them by looking at CMBR.


Hi arbitrageur.

I dont know, this struggle between belief and science has already "earned" many bad things to humanity. Scientists have burned for him to say things the status quo did not agree, atomic bombs have exploded, we went to the moon, we discovered bacterias living in cyanide. I do not doubt nothing more.

I just hope they dont give up to enlightening people.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:13 PM
link   
reply to post by oozyism
 


Lets wait and see. I still hope that while we breathe .



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:14 PM
link   
reply to post by T0by
 


I understand and agree with you.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 


Some people born to BE.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by RUSSO
 


Apart from parallel or different dimensions, I thought the universe was everything..
If there's more doesn't that just mean THE universe is bigger than they thought, not another one?????


Definitions of universe on the Web:

* everything that exists anywhere;

www.google.com.au...:universe&sa=X&ei=vkkITZ6JPIOnrAet0YTVDg&ved=0CBUQkAE
edit on 14-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)


Either that or we have to redefine the word universe in the dictionary. Or create a better one/definition


This is cool. Change is good



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:21 PM
link   
The idea of multiple universes in bubbles intrigues me.

I like the line about the laws of physics in each universe could be dramatically different. If they were different how could they exist?

And, if there are multiple bubble universes what are the laws for where these bubbles are formed?

As I said quite intriguing.


I think it is impossible for the universe to be non cyclic. If the universe is symmetrical, as is thought, then the white holes are spewing new matter in at the same amount that black holes are pulling it out.

I love astro/particle physics.


Pred...



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 





I don't know, man. Seems real to me
(awaits flammage).



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:27 PM
link   
Cool, other Universe... well now it would be called a Multiverse huh? Hmm, if its true, I think it would be extremely arrogant to think we're alone.



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:33 PM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


good post

Unfortunately, I find the concept and idea that scientists have finally found their FIRST evidence of alien life somewhat hard to swallw.

So...after billions and billions of us taxpayer dollars and zillions funded with seti only NOW we are fed this tidbit nibble of a newsworthy article...

well, absolute bullcarp...

nothing, and i mean nothing could be further from the truth!

Of course, we all know stars are in space...yet in every single photograph or video from the ISS there are no stars...why is that!

all the better to lie to the sheep



posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Mizzijr
 


You have any doubt?

No way we are alone in this universe. Then imagine a concept that allows more than one.


Im not arrogant. I just try to be reasonable.




posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 11:36 PM
link   
What definition of universe are they using? "Universe" is a word for the totality of everything that exists. So if they find "other universes", those "other universes" are just a part of the ONE universe. So there is still only one universe.

What they should be saying is that they found new parts of the universe, not more universes.
edit on 14-12-2010 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
64
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join