should evolutionist be allowed to promote a field of science as a religion ?

I have noticed on these boards specifically that alot of Evolutionist are completely insane, they go around trying to convince everybody of their dictated truth. Why can evolutionist see that their Theory is just a small part of the picture but it does not replace the (Why) question.

Evolution is not a replacement for religion although it would seem the evolutionist would try to make it... Why is that ?

personally it poses no threat to me or my beliefs, I have consumed evolution and it tasted good but I only consider it a small snack before the main course.

EDIT: Oops, somehow ended up replying to a different thread than I read... watch this space.

Huh, well, it seems that I somehow replied to a fusion of the two OPs in different threads. This is getting to be confusing with the same-author-different-thread thing...

Evolution ain't trying to replace religion. Like I've said a thousand (well, more than three) times, it doesn't care about religion. The only reason that science and religion have any argument is that while Science goes around answering cause and mechanism through logical interpretation of evidence, and Philosophy exists to ponder reason through abstract... well, reasoning... Religion, which is primarily a form of philosophy, has started to push their answer to "why" onto our turf, and saying that "how" is not so because "why" overrules.

Which is unfriendly, really. Naturally, we (those whose interest is science rather than philosophy - and let's not go calling one or the other childish, because that is just elitist and elitism I can talk about all day and all night, too).