It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mizzijr
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
War has to be announced. If we are in the middle of WW3 then America is the enemy this time, cause the American people don't know.
Originally posted by Mizzijr
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
War has to be announced. If we are in the middle of WW3 then America is the enemy this time, cause the American people don't know.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
Combating insurgents and terrorists can hardly be considered anything like fighting the Axis powers and the Nazi war machine. We're not exactly going up against a big bad well-equipped and wealthy enemy. Plus I don't think there are enough countries involved in the conflict to really call it a World War.
Originally posted by Solasis
There isn't ground combat occurring in every key border area; the sides are not clearly delineated and no strong alliances have been formed; no one has declared war; we are not in a wartime economy; first world countries are not under active attack.
World War 3 has not started, but perhaps what you're talking about are skirmishes leading up to it, and will be considered the "prologue" in future history books.
Originally posted by Hefficide
The US most definitely is engaging in Imperial adventurism presently. But such behavior will not devolve into WW3 unless the battle is joined, on the other side, by a nation with a large, standing, army, navy, and air force. And, as it appears presently, no nation with those types of resources is going to step to the plate any time soon.