posted on Dec, 14 2010 @ 05:18 PM
What I wonder is - So what if he IS CIA?
I know that there were CIA agents that knew about problems with the official story of the weapons of mass destruction. I know there were CIA agents
that knew about and objected to the US being so in bed with Saudia Arabia.
I know there's CIA agents very concerned about the US media being so dysfunctional.
So what - if he is CIA - does that mean BAD or DISINFO by association?
Personally, I don't think the CIA is all bad. They've done some really hideous stuff, that is true. IE MK-Ultra, human experimentation, ect., but
I don't for a second think that was the entire agency doing that stuff. Sometimes I wonder if the CIA isn't at war with itself on some of today's
In any event, if it seems 'right' in that if people are being informed, corruption is being uncovered and truth is coming out, Dyncorp is being
outed, ect., then so WHAT if it IS CIA?
The disinfo that **I** see, it's not the cables - it's how certain US media outlets are interpreting, 'analyzing' 'filtering' the cables. That
is where I see most of the US slant coming from.