posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 09:12 PM
reply to post by freedish
. . .technically a plane full of gas. . .
Jet fuel is a specific grade of Kerosene.
It can burn rapidly when aerosolized.
It does not explode.
The October Clues "nose out" theory is a good example.
The "nose" was pure liquid fuel that once it got a ways outside the building, it slowed down enough for the fire to catch up, and overtake it and
engulf the fuel in flame.
So rather than an explosion, it is fuel dispersed in a rapid fashion then igniting. Nothing like an actual explosion from military grade
So, "bombing" is not from an airplane impact. That does not make sense. A bombing would refer to a bomb going off, like you mentioned, either
dropped, or planted. I would suggest another type: Think WW II and the V-2 rockets the Germans were aiming at London. What were they called? Flying
bombs. The bomb was not rocket fuel but actual bomb type explosive in the front of the rocket.
What would be analogous today would be a cruise missile. I very much consider that as a possible device used in the 911 attacks. I believe there is
such a device that is in the 911 videos available for viewing today. It is sometimes referred to as the "orb". The clearer videos, including one of
the recent NIST released ones, show what seems to be small wings, but that could be a variant of a cruise missile and could have been an especially
large one, to deliver sufficient payload for the job, which would be to take out the central columns to start the initial stage of the collapse of the